View Poll Results: Which one?
GT30R
19
65.52%
GT35R
10
34.48%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll
Ok, going to buy the new turbo this month, GT30R or GT35R?
10-13-2005, 01:18 PM
#61
Nordschleife Master
10-13-2005, 02:41 PM
#62
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago / Skokie, IL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Machtig Turbo
Anyways, the end turbo config is a GT35R with .63 exhaust housing AR, TO4S cover and V band option. SFR is supplying all parts including v band down pipe and a x over to match... cant wait!
What about having a good welder extend your original crossover pipe to meet the turbocharger? Markus951 extended it by about 5cm.
Markus951
10-13-2005, 03:53 PM
#63
Race Director
Thread Starter
My x over is an 86 one piece, so dont really mind changing. Also, the stock piece is crushed etc and prone to leaking...
I will take LOTS of pics dont worry
Just waiting on Tim to put together the package yay!
I will take LOTS of pics dont worry
Just waiting on Tim to put together the package yay!
10-13-2005, 04:38 PM
#64
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago / Skokie, IL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep us posted on this. I am very intersted in this package as well.(GT30R/35R v-band, downpipe, x-over, fittings, lines ect.) .
Maybe a rennlist group discount???
-Alex
Maybe a rennlist group discount???
-Alex
02-13-2010, 11:51 PM
#66
Rennlist Member
Hey Andrew, this thread just dropped off completely. Is this when you started to abandon ship? Did you ever wind up going with this turbo?
02-14-2010, 12:28 AM
#67
Race Director
Thread Starter
Holy thread revival! I sold my car before I got to try that turbo... but I have seen many 1600-3000cc motors use various specification GT30-35 turbo, and for my mind, they are bang for buck the best turbos out there.
02-14-2010, 01:05 AM
#68
Rennlist Member
Yeah I thought you'd get a kick out of seeing this again.
So do you still think the GT3582 .63 is good for a 2.5L?
So do you still think the GT3582 .63 is good for a 2.5L?
02-14-2010, 01:21 AM
#69
Race Director
Thread Starter
I honestly think the .63 housing is too small for the 2.5. I know it depends on a lot of other factors like CFM flow in the head etc, but to put it into perspective, a mate has a .63 GT35 on his 1.6 4AGE 16v, and revs to 8,000rpm and makes 450WHP. I have seen a LOT of RB20 SR20 and 3S motors (all 2.0) make 500WHP plus on the .63 housing, I really think the .82 housing is the way to go on the 2.5. I used a .63 on mine and I think it really choked it.
02-14-2010, 04:23 AM
#70
Drifting
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-14-2010, 05:50 AM
#71
Rennlist Member
02-14-2010, 06:20 AM
#72
Drifting
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
adequate,enough, expensive but not obsenne
about 500hp $2500+ but requires no wastgate ..
https://aerocharger.com/shop/index.p...rocharger.html
about 500hp $2500+ but requires no wastgate ..
https://aerocharger.com/shop/index.p...rocharger.html
02-14-2010, 06:39 AM
#73
Rennlist Member
On one hand I'm really surprised that not more people try this and how quiet the marketplace awareness is, but on the other hand I wonder just how much I want such a linear response? Perhaps I'm just getting old?
