Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

piston/cylinder tolerance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2005, 10:11 PM
  #1  
OriginalSterm
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
OriginalSterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default piston/cylinder tolerance question

Can you run tolerance group 1 pistons in a tolerance 0 cylinder? I have a block coated with nikasil and I have not measured the cylinder bore to be sure, but I believe they built it to tolerance group 0 specs.

If it is tolerance group 0, are my current group 1 pistons OK?
Old 08-15-2005, 11:11 PM
  #2  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

The spec is .008 to .032mm with a wear limit of .08mm.

Group 0 cylinders are 100mm on the dot according to the tech spec book.

Group 1 pistons are 99.983 to 99.997 according to the book. That means you could in theory end up with a clearance as small as .003, which is less than half the tightest permissible clearance.

Regardless of what the books may say, the only way to know for sure is to precision measure your pistons and bores. When you get cylinders redone, you normally bring the pistons to the machine shop and let them bore the cylinders to fit the pistons.

Having said all that, if this is the motor you had Nikasil coated (US Chrome NiCom?), then I imagine you would need to get the proper clearance (and piston compatibility) from them. My aftermarket pistons, for example, came with their own clearance spec. Did your coater confirm that stock 944 pistons will work in the hard bores? I thought the whole point of that coating was to clear the way to use aftermarket (JE, Weisco, etc.) pistons?
Old 08-15-2005, 11:58 PM
  #3  
OriginalSterm
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
OriginalSterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the shop doing the nikasil was told we'd be using stock 944 turbo pistons. they assured me everything would be fine assuming i was able to find rings designed for nikasil. 964 piston are the correct size and designed for nikasil. i am going to try and get the exact dimensions from the shop tomorrow to confirm if stock pistons will work, if they don't have the numbers i can get the bores measured. if they come out to be tolerance 0 (100mm on the dot), would repeating the diamond hone process remove (displace?) enough material to be workable?
Old 08-16-2005, 05:08 PM
  #4  
DAR951
Pro
 
DAR951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OriginalSterm
would repeating the diamond hone process remove (displace?) enough material to be workable?
Orignially, Nikasil cylinders were not intended (nor was there equipment for them) to be "bored". The nickel coating was REALLY hard and meant to last virtually "forever"... so no need for any oversizes or "boring" process. That didn't work out quite as expected, and now some specialty shops work on oversize Nikasil bores (as it seems yours does). However, if the new coating is anywhere near as hard as the original, I expect you'll need to have the entire process repeated to achieve acceptable results... don't know how thick the nickle coating is, but I don't believe you can "just shave 'em down a bit"...
Old 08-16-2005, 05:39 PM
  #5  
OriginalSterm
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
OriginalSterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i did speak with the shop today. he told me all the bores are "exactly" 100 mm. i told him that i had tolerance 1 pistons and his response was that it wouldn't be a problem since the pistons i have are used and not new, and therefore probably not at the high end of the tolerance band anyways. his best recommendation was to leave the block as is and measure the pistons for size and shape, the put the engine back together and not worry about it. so i will be measuring the pistons and putting this thing back together (hopefully).

FYI...
he told me they could put as much as 0.040" thick nikasil on the cylinders.
Old 08-16-2005, 11:31 PM
  #6  
dand86951
Burning Brakes
 
dand86951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have the pistons checked and rechecked for their current diameter. I wouldn't want to take a chance on the pistons being at the top end of the tolerance and giving you half the minimum Porsche specified. These engines run a tight tolerance to begin with and if cut the clearance to .003mm you essentially have an interference fit with absolutely no allowance for any errors. Why did Porsche put the tolerance groups on the pistons and bores? Most lilkely because they had too to keep engines from siezing up and still minimize the clearances to keep blowby to a minimum.

My stock group 1 Pistons at almost 90,000 miles were close to the middle of the tolerance group. Yours may be on the high side, they may be on the low side, until you measure them accurately you just don't know. I wouldn't take the chance.
Old 08-16-2005, 11:37 PM
  #7  
OriginalSterm
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
OriginalSterm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dand86951
Have the pistons checked and rechecked for their current diameter. I wouldn't want to take a chance on the pistons being at the top end of the tolerance and giving you half the minimum Porsche specified. These engines run a tight tolerance to begin with and if cut the clearance to .003mm you essentially have an interference fit with absolutely no allowance for any errors. Why did Porsche put the tolerance groups on the pistons and bores? Most lilkely because they had too to keep engines from siezing up and still minimize the clearances to keep blowby to a minimum.

My stock group 1 Pistons at almost 90,000 miles were close to the middle of the tolerance group. Yours may be on the high side, they may be on the low side, until you measure them accurately you just don't know. I wouldn't take the chance.
Agreed, I will definitely have these measured to confirm.
Old 08-17-2005, 02:31 AM
  #8  
hosrom_951
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
 
hosrom_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UAE & Germany
Posts: 9,142
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This could help you out:

Old 08-17-2005, 02:34 AM
  #9  
hosrom_951
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
 
hosrom_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UAE & Germany
Posts: 9,142
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here are the limits/specs:




Quick Reply: piston/cylinder tolerance question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:24 PM.