Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

DME destroyed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2018, 12:30 PM
  #151  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Thank you for that! Perfect.

As for the sensors being bad, that would be a good one: since I reversed them and got the same readings, they would BOTH have to be bad.. and whichever is installed in the speed hole appears to have an excellent signal on the scope (see post 137). However, if that ends up being the case, I'm going to totally lose it!

At least I can now replace & gap sensors quicker than it takes to make a peanut butter sandwich. Crunchy.
Old 04-03-2018, 01:03 PM
  #152  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Martinic
Thank you for that! Perfect.

As for the sensors being bad, that would be a good one: since I reversed them and got the same readings, they would BOTH have to be bad.. and whichever is installed in the speed hole appears to have an excellent signal on the scope (see post 137). However, if that ends up being the case, I'm going to totally lose it!

At least I can now replace & gap sensors quicker than it takes to make a peanut butter sandwich. Crunchy.
My hunch has been on the harness for a while now, and even if something else is causing your issue, I think the money was well spent on a replacement harness.
Old 04-03-2018, 02:11 PM
  #153  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by divil
I'd suggest reading the thread entitled 'No Start After Clutch Job' from a few years back. That guy was in a very similar situation to yours
OMG! I just read through most of this gentleman's almost year-long battle.. I've got the FAE sensors!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm ordering a set of Bosch immediately. Budget is officially in the RED

EDIT: Ok, now that I've calmed down, first I better test the FAE shielding leak issue like the original thread's results

Last edited by Dan Martinic; 04-03-2018 at 02:28 PM.
Old 04-03-2018, 03:37 PM
  #154  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Are you ordering the Lindsey Racing replacement harnesses? Specifically the Knock sensor harness?

https://www.lindseyracing.com/LR/Parts/HARNESS.html


Originally Posted by Dan Martinic
Ordered.

Until it arrives, I have to ask: how do you install this thing?

The place I ordered from -- chosen because they offer USPS which saves us Canucks big customs "processing" fees, aprox. 45US+ per item -- has these images that suggest you install the other end into the DME harness. But, my harness looks to be a solid piece of plastic?

Old 04-03-2018, 05:56 PM
  #155  
PerryB
Instructor
 
PerryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Creede, CO
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Mr. Martinic,

I sent you a PM. If you replaced your original Bosch speed and reference sensors with FAE brand sensors, you must test them to see if the center pin on the harness connector has continuity with the metal shield end. If there is continuity then the sensors will pass all the tests but will send a false ground signal to the DME, preventing the car from running. This is what happened to my car.

After I cut off the metal shield the car started instantly.

Ideally, you should replace the FAE sensors with oem Bosch.

Perry
Old 04-03-2018, 07:30 PM
  #156  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

I am ordering the reference sensor harness; unfortunately, Lindsay doesn't do USPS international, so I'm getting it elsewhere that does, but it appears to be the same one.

Now.. following my new lead (thanks Perry) & outside to test some FAE sensors and DME ohm values....
Old 04-03-2018, 09:14 PM
  #157  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Here are my FAE results.. slightly different than Perry's (post #209 -> https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...ch-job-14.html )

EDIT: My "0s" in the chart are actually "OL" or infinity on the meter


EDIT: By "to ground" above I mean to the chassis (I used the door arm thing as a ground)

I then pulled the reference sensor and I have continuity between pin 1 on the sensor (furthest on one side, labelled "1" inside the connector) and the metal shield; the centre and the other pin (pins 2 & 3 inside the connector) have no continuity with the shield:



Any thoughts?

Last edited by Dan Martinic; 04-03-2018 at 10:05 PM. Reason: Reference to Perry's FAE results chart added
Old 04-03-2018, 09:33 PM
  #158  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Here is the Clark's page sensor pin values & connector numbers; I believe my number 1 is 25 in the diagram:



I assume "78" above is actually DME pin 5?
Old 04-03-2018, 09:36 PM
  #159  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Wait a second... if "78" is DME pin 5, I don't have >1 M-ohm
Old 04-04-2018, 07:45 AM
  #160  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

TROUBLESHOOTING UPDATE!

I got up at 4am this morning to complete the tests from last night. Very interesting findings!

ONE of my FAE sensors (my original BG) has continuity between its pin 1 & the metal shield; the other (my original DG) DOES NOT.

Updated chart -- confirmed and clarified the original chart and tested with sensors switched places







The sensors by themselves, removed from the car:



NOTE: each time I tested at the DME pins (first two charts), I installed the sensors with their bolts fastened

I am going to call the supplier and add 2 new Bosch sensors to the order (after putting the order for the harness yesterday, I called them and asked them to hold the shipping until I confirm wether or not I'd like new sensors)

Wish me luck that this is the actual issue... one FAE sensor that has continuity between its outside "pin 1" (pin 25 or 8 in Clark's diagram above) and its metal shield/bottom casing

Last edited by Dan Martinic; 04-04-2018 at 11:07 AM. Reason: Clarified titles of charts 1 & 2
Old 04-04-2018, 10:12 AM
  #161  
divil
Three Wheelin'
 
divil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,716
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I had forgotten the exact details of Perry's issue, but it's coming back to me after reading the recent updates. If you're inclined to do more testing while you wait for the parts, I think you should be able to verify it with the scope. If you remove the plastic cover on the DME plug (as shown in the Lindsey Racing instructions I linked to) and slide it up out of the way, then you can plug it in to the DME and probe the pins through the top at the same time. If the signal wire is indeed shorted to the shield, then you should get a good signal from the sensor when unplugged, but nothing when it's plugged into the DME (because the DME grounds the shield). Of course if you're buying new sensors anyway it might make sense to just wait for those.
Old 04-04-2018, 10:21 AM
  #162  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Neat.. thanks. I think I'll try that just to see.

What gets me is when I switch the sensors (ie. put the B into the D hole), I get "proper" resistance readings; but, when I switched these in my testing on the weekend, it made no difference to the no-start symptoms

Last edited by Dan Martinic; 04-04-2018 at 10:26 AM. Reason: clarification
Old 04-04-2018, 12:25 PM
  #163  
Alan 91 C2
Rennlist Member
 
Alan 91 C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toccoa, GA
Posts: 456
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Hi Dan,

The reference sensor signal must be as shown on the Porsche diagram. The signal must go positive and then negative. A positive only signal will not work.
So you need to look at the sensor connector signal, using an oscope, then connect the sensor to the DME harness, and look at the DME connector signal. If there is a harness issue, you will see a difference between the sensor connector signal and the DME connector. Or if both are correct, check from the back of the connected DME connector.
It would take a diode theory course, EE degree, to explain why you need both plus and minus on the Ref signal, but the short answer is the DME pulse is generated when the plus portion of the signal goes negative.
You are very close to solving this.
Old 04-04-2018, 12:44 PM
  #164  
Alan 91 C2
Rennlist Member
 
Alan 91 C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toccoa, GA
Posts: 456
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

The relevant diode theory here is that electronic technicians are taught in the steady state electricity world. Where a diode passes the signal only one direction. While true in steady state, not true in the millisecond world.

Turns out that when the PN junction is forward biased, current flow. And then quickly reversed biased, as in the REF signal spike going negative, the PN junction will allow a brief current flow, (mil or micro second, depending on PN junction construction) in the reverse direction. This action is the basis for all signal generators, as this small reverse bias current flow is amplified to be a pulse.
Old 04-04-2018, 01:02 PM
  #165  
PerryB
Instructor
 
PerryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Creede, CO
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Wow, it's deja vu all over again!

With the sensors removed from the car, none of the pins should have any continuity with the metal shield on the end of the sensor.

If you look at the wiring diagram, the wires from the connector to the sensor have a shield/sheath (a finely woven metal mesh tube running the length of the wire) that is between the exterior rubber insulation and the sensor wires. This mesh is grounded through pins 5 (for the reference sensor BG) and 23 (for the speed sensor DG) on the DME. The shield on the end of the sensor should not have continuity with anything when the sensor is out of the car.

The other two pins in each connector should have a resistance between them of 600 to 1600 Ohms when tested through the harness at their connections with the DME.

In your video, it shows that the metal shield on the end of the sensor has continuity with one of the pins. That should not happen.

I would replace both sensors with oem Bosch. I would not order a new harness. I ordered and installed one from Ian at 944 Online. The harness was high quality, but installing it into a 30+ year old car meant that you are very likely to break some of the brittle, fragile plastic pieces of the DME to harness connector. Also, it's a pain in the butt to work the wires through the firewall and into the rubber boot on the DME connector. Very fiddly.

Good luck, and keep me informed!

Perry


Quick Reply: DME destroyed?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:20 AM.