Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Impact pipe vs impact absorber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2016, 07:38 AM
  #1  
Smitje 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Smitje 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 298
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts
Default Impact pipe vs impact absorber

'87 S4 Auto:

In the proces of cleaning the underside and back end of the car I decided to remove the aluminium bumper. Doing so, I discovered that one of the impact pipes (part nr. 928 505 018 20) was slightly damaged:





Checking into a replacement I discovered that Porsche offered an impact absorber as an option (parts nr. 928 505 016 22):



As they are more expensive than the pipes, I wonder if it is worth the money: if they were absolutely necessary or critical Porsche would have installed them on all cars straight out of the factory I guess.

Any thoughts on pipes versus absorber?
Old 10-10-2016, 08:26 AM
  #2  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,926
Received 296 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

I would find a set of used bumper shocks instead of the pipes. It will allow your bumper to absorb 15 mph impacts without frame damage, not something I can say about the pipes.

Used shocks are very cheap here in the US and it would save you a lot of money to find a set used over in Europe or here in the US.
Old 10-10-2016, 05:20 PM
  #3  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Believe the bumper shocks were to meet US 5-mph (or maybe 15mph as Blake says) crash regulations.
The same regs that gave US cars the huge chin bumpers and rubber pads etc...

Euro cars didn't have that requirement, so they didn't get them.

As long as you only intend to crash over 5mph, then you don't need them
Old 10-10-2016, 06:24 PM
  #4  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
Euro cars didn't have that requirement, so they didn't get them.
Some did. It was option M058. In all 7007 ROW cars have it listed.
Old 10-10-2016, 11:30 PM
  #5  
DKWalser
Rennlist Member
 
DKWalser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mesa, Arizona, USA
Posts: 492
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Some did. It was option M058. In all 7007 ROW cars have it listed.
I suspect that these were cars originally intended for the USA market. Somewhere in the process, they were diverted elsewhere.
Old 10-11-2016, 01:09 AM
  #6  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DKWalser
I suspect that these were cars originally intended for the USA market. Somewhere in the process, they were diverted elsewhere.
No, it was just option one could get. Cars intended to US market would need to have US style body. These do not have it. Their VIN is within normal ROW VIN set etc.
Old 10-11-2016, 06:59 AM
  #7  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,702
Received 664 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

Al the later 928's imported here had the shock absorbers fitted and they most definitely are ROW models.

Indeed I was surprised to read that any models were kitted with solid mounts like the ones in the OP's car. Many MB cars supplied to the German [mainland European?] market went cheap compared to export market models but I was not aware that Porsche did something along these lines. If you have such a device in the locker why go with a piece of plumbing other than to save a few coins?

Rgds

Fred
Old 10-11-2016, 07:10 AM
  #8  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

These were option in Germany. My old automatic had them while manual GTS do not. It was just one more extra one could get if parking problems were worry for buyer.
Old 10-11-2016, 09:38 AM
  #9  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,634
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

And then there's people (me) who prefer them! Saves 3 pounds (or ?) per corner.

These were retrofitted ("Federalized") correctly on one of my RoW imports and not changed on the other. Now I've swapped them out to "pipes" on the rear of the one that was done right. Lots of work to put in the absorbers as that long body can't be worked through the frame.
Old 10-11-2016, 12:29 PM
  #10  
DKWalser
Rennlist Member
 
DKWalser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mesa, Arizona, USA
Posts: 492
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
No, it was just option one could get. Cars intended to US market would need to have US style body. These do not have it. Their VIN is within normal ROW VIN set etc.
Interesting.
Old 10-13-2016, 08:29 AM
  #11  
Smitje 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Smitje 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 298
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the feedback! Sounds like there is something to say for both options, but I will try to find a pair of absorbers somewhere.

Have been trying to source a pair here in The Netherlands, so far no luck. Hopefully Roger has a pair within reach.....
Old 04-15-2017, 10:38 AM
  #12  
Smitje 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Smitje 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 298
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Finally......






Delivered this afternoon, bought them from LA Autoparts through Ebay. They are in great shape, even though they are 'used'



Quick Reply: Impact pipe vs impact absorber



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:13 PM.