Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

HP + TQ for 16v heads and 5.0 block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2015, 12:30 AM
  #16  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Cost me , if I remember right, 250? To get the Pistons fly cut for the 2v heads. All the rest of the "cost" was maintenance and rebuild. Nothing else really special needed. Finding the euro parts is the fun part of the build. I got a ridiculously good deal from a gentleman in England. Heads, cams, towers, i take...... All shipped for 700 bucks. I paid more for shipping than I did for the parts!!
Old 02-28-2015, 06:55 AM
  #17  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Debrue
For an '81 5-spd with a 4.5L I am shopping a couple of ideas for power upgrade

1) buy a bolt-on supercharger or
2) toss the 4.5 for a 5.0 which will also mean some head/cam work will have to be done

I think costs are roughly the same between 1 and 2 and finished power will be similar.

For those of you who did the 5.0 swap why not a supercharger instead?
Well, the engine design is quite old and not optimised, so rather than just trying to force air into it and still have the restrictive heads and exhaust, I decided to port the heads and build a custom exhaust. We are rebuilding the engine and you can view the reworked heads with the larger 48 mm intakes valves in my other threads. The custom exhaust is also there for viewing, these changes are sympathetic with the car and fix what is there rather than apply a band aid.

I am not knocking forced induction, I am just saying fix what is there first before trying to up the ante, the 5.0 litre approach is also simpler in terms of tuning etc, while your in there please change to a later type of injector and give yourself a compression bump.
Old 02-28-2015, 07:14 AM
  #18  
Tazzieman
Instructor
 
Tazzieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by slate blue
the 5.0 litre approach is also simpler in terms of tuning etc, while your in there please change to a later type of injector
What do you recommend for 16v heads + 5.0 block?
Old 02-28-2015, 07:58 AM
  #19  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

My setup with ported heads, 48mm intake valves, sports camshafts, special valve springs, Dellorto 48mm carbs and intake would do nicely on a 5.0L block.
See post #22: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...e-money-2.html
See post #27: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...e-money-2.html
Åke

Last edited by Strosek Ultra; 06-19-2015 at 04:53 AM.
Old 02-28-2015, 08:47 AM
  #20  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tazzieman
What do you recommend for 16v heads + 5.0 block?
If you are referring to the injectors, I was using 28 lb 4 spray hole GM injectors made by Bosch. I bought slightly larger EV14 style for the 104 mm bore engine as they have much lighter internal components, maybe something like that in a injector around 24 to 26 lb as long as you can tune it.
Old 02-28-2015, 02:41 PM
  #21  
Debrue
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Debrue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
Check your math and estimates. List the costs here so people can sanity-check them.
I don't have itemized costs just a guestimate. I have about an hour or two of research. Decided to post rennlist with questions.

I think costs are roughly the same between s/c and 5.0 swap and finished power will be similar. I have read a basic s/c kit will add up to 100hp and by the looks of it a 5.0 swap is about the same with proper heads, cams, intake.

New s/c is $6k and $8k a used kit will be less. I will do the install.

the 5.0 block will be up to $3000 including purchase, shipping, refresh plus heads, cam and new everything when you put it together (belt, h2o pump, headers, exhaust, injectors, tuning), yank the 4.5 and install 5.0. I figure $6-$8k. I will pay for the install.
Old 03-02-2015, 04:32 PM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Debrue
I don't have itemized costs just a guestimate. I have about an hour or two of research. Decided to post rennlist with questions.

I think costs are roughly the same between s/c and 5.0 swap and finished power will be similar. I have read a basic s/c kit will add up to 100hp and by the looks of it a 5.0 swap is about the same with proper heads, cams, intake.

New s/c is $6k and $8k a used kit will be less. I will do the install.

the 5.0 block will be up to $3000 including purchase, shipping, refresh plus heads, cam and new everything when you put it together (belt, h2o pump, headers, exhaust, injectors, tuning), yank the 4.5 and install 5.0. I figure $6-$8k. I will pay for the install.
the 5.0 upgrade is cheap... just flycut those pistons, rebearing the rod bearings and put it back together. you dont need a water pump, or anything else. sometimes a new water pump, as we have seen is more suspect than a good old one. a few new gaskets, timing belt and off you go. even with no euro stuff, you are in good shape..... however, i would certainly do the euro heads and cams. intake you can do later or make something to bolt on later.
Old 03-02-2015, 08:12 PM
  #23  
Tazzieman
Instructor
 
Tazzieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by slate blue
If you are referring to the injectors, I was using 28 lb 4 spray hole GM injectors made by Bosch. I bought slightly larger EV14 style for the 104 mm bore engine as they have much lighter internal components, maybe something like that in a injector around 24 to 26 lb as long as you can tune it.
I only have K Jet , so no good for me
Old 03-02-2015, 11:22 PM
  #24  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

With k jet, you can make a euro hybrid still
Old 03-03-2015, 12:43 AM
  #25  
Tazzieman
Instructor
 
Tazzieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ducman82
With k jet, you can make a euro hybrid still
I've got a hybrid (US M28/44 block + Aussie 16v heads) ; it has the old style injectors
Old 03-03-2015, 01:53 PM
  #26  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tazzieman
I've got a hybrid (US M28/44 block + Aussie 16v heads) ; it has the old style injectors
the CIS hybrids are the most powerful (aside from a real LHjet euro hybrid)
310-320rwhp vs 290rwhp for a US 80-84 Ljet conversion)
Old 03-03-2015, 04:25 PM
  #27  
Tazzieman
Instructor
 
Tazzieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
the CIS hybrids are the most powerful (aside from a real LHjet euro hybrid)
310-320rwhp vs 290rwhp for a US 80-84 Ljet conversion)
It does seem to manage to "keep up with modern traffic"
Old 03-03-2015, 08:07 PM
  #28  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,221
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

As usual, some of the dyno numbers being tossed around here are just plain silly.

You have to be realistic/use your head.

A stock, good running '85/'86 Euro with 80,000+ miles will make about 275rwhp +/- 10hp.

Why would anyone think that simply raising the displacement 300cc raise the rwhp output 35-45 horsepower, with no other changes?

Simply not going to happen. Totally Dreamland stuff.
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 03-03-2015, 08:43 PM
  #29  
Tazzieman
Instructor
 
Tazzieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Why would anyone think that simply raising the displacement 300cc raise the rwhp output 35-45 horsepower, with no other changes?
Mine had some changes apparently , the worst of which was converting a non-interference motor into an interference one. But I can live with that "mod".
Old 03-03-2015, 09:02 PM
  #30  
Dave928S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 4,681
Received 64 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tazzieman
Mine had some changes apparently , the worst of which was converting a non-interference motor into an interference one. But I can live with that "mod".
Your motor is proof that pistons don't have to be flycut (I've viewed them with an endoscope), and that when you don't flycut, it then becomes an interference motor (which I've also physically confirmed). It would be interesting to know what your compression ratio is ... I suspect it might be up there.


Quick Reply: HP + TQ for 16v heads and 5.0 block



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:20 AM.