Moving my 1990 GT oil cooler.
#61
Pro
Thread Starter
Also, the 928 engine is often talked about as "20th century design", but given your comments re the clearances, how does it compare, in absolute terms, with other engines, from then and now, in it's bearing design?
#62
Rennlist Member
#63
Nordschleife Master
I think that adding a second oil pressure sensor after the mains, perhaps in the heads, might make sense and detect any problems earlier. However, there's the effect that pressure in a relatively slow flowing fluid is going to equate quickly, and I'd be interested in understanding the scenarios in which there are big differences in the oil pressure between different parts of the galleys.
Another thing to think about is the amount of air in the oil. Since the 928 oil pump has very high capacity and is designed to bypass a lot of oil at high rpms, it's conceivable that even if there's some air in the supply the pump can compress the air to a high enough pressure (and bypass less) such that the pressure in the oil galleys remains high. Since air doesn't lubricate very well, this would be a problem; and more importantly, a problem that is not necessarily revealed by the oil pressure reading.
One thing that would be very useful measurement would the cycling of the oil pump bypass valve. If the oil bypass valve starts bypassing less of whatever is in the system, that's an indication of the pump pumping compressible fluid -- there's a lot of air in the system. The bypass valve position, oil pressure, and rpm could together be used as a simple table that would give the amount of air in the oil. High rpm, low oil pressure, and bypass valve not bypassing would be an indication of a lot of air in the circuit. But, important, high rpm and bypass valve not bypassing would still indicate a problem even if the pressure in the oil galleys is high -- it's partly pressurized air in the galleys.
On the rod side clearances, here's my opinion. The rod side clearances in most engines, and by memory in 928 S4 engine are so wide that they don't directly influence the oil flow rate from the simple leak area perspective.
The reason why one might want to open up the rod side clearances in a high rpm engine is that the crank and the rods bend and flex. Larger bearing clearances and large side clearances allow for these changes in shape without creating metal to metal contact with a high load. The problems created by too tight rod side clearance may look like oil supply problems, but I believe that the underlying cause is different. This is just my belief, not pretending to be an expert. Just pointing out that from the simple geometry perspective, the side clearance shouldn't impact oil pressure in any way as long as the parts don't change shape.
One more thing relating to some earlier comments in the thread. I don't understand why, say, 4 bar oil pressure at 2000 rpm would ever be a problem. The required oil supply pressure at the mains is proportional to the square of the rpm. At 2000 rpm, the main need only about 10% of the oil pressure that they need at 6700 rpm. 4 bar of oil pressure at 2000 rpm should be plenty, if there are no actual problems with the engine (and thus the 4 bar oil pressure isn't a symptom of those other problems).
A smarter oil pressure warning system would have a table of the warning light coming on at different pressures depending on the engine rpm. This could again be accommodated by an ECU that would take the bypass valve position, rpm, and the oil pressure as inputs.
Another thing to think about is the amount of air in the oil. Since the 928 oil pump has very high capacity and is designed to bypass a lot of oil at high rpms, it's conceivable that even if there's some air in the supply the pump can compress the air to a high enough pressure (and bypass less) such that the pressure in the oil galleys remains high. Since air doesn't lubricate very well, this would be a problem; and more importantly, a problem that is not necessarily revealed by the oil pressure reading.
One thing that would be very useful measurement would the cycling of the oil pump bypass valve. If the oil bypass valve starts bypassing less of whatever is in the system, that's an indication of the pump pumping compressible fluid -- there's a lot of air in the system. The bypass valve position, oil pressure, and rpm could together be used as a simple table that would give the amount of air in the oil. High rpm, low oil pressure, and bypass valve not bypassing would be an indication of a lot of air in the circuit. But, important, high rpm and bypass valve not bypassing would still indicate a problem even if the pressure in the oil galleys is high -- it's partly pressurized air in the galleys.
On the rod side clearances, here's my opinion. The rod side clearances in most engines, and by memory in 928 S4 engine are so wide that they don't directly influence the oil flow rate from the simple leak area perspective.
The reason why one might want to open up the rod side clearances in a high rpm engine is that the crank and the rods bend and flex. Larger bearing clearances and large side clearances allow for these changes in shape without creating metal to metal contact with a high load. The problems created by too tight rod side clearance may look like oil supply problems, but I believe that the underlying cause is different. This is just my belief, not pretending to be an expert. Just pointing out that from the simple geometry perspective, the side clearance shouldn't impact oil pressure in any way as long as the parts don't change shape.
One more thing relating to some earlier comments in the thread. I don't understand why, say, 4 bar oil pressure at 2000 rpm would ever be a problem. The required oil supply pressure at the mains is proportional to the square of the rpm. At 2000 rpm, the main need only about 10% of the oil pressure that they need at 6700 rpm. 4 bar of oil pressure at 2000 rpm should be plenty, if there are no actual problems with the engine (and thus the 4 bar oil pressure isn't a symptom of those other problems).
A smarter oil pressure warning system would have a table of the warning light coming on at different pressures depending on the engine rpm. This could again be accommodated by an ECU that would take the bypass valve position, rpm, and the oil pressure as inputs.
It has been discussed and something I'm very surprised doesn't get more air time around here, the one perceived downside is you will see lower oil pressure.
The engine sitting in the corner destined for my 79 track car is only coming apart so Turbo Todd can machine the connecting rods to open up that clearance. I'm also doing the same for the 944S engine I'm putting together. Even though it's a 100% street car.
The specifications for every stroker I've seen had wider side clearances than a stock engine.
The engine sitting in the corner destined for my 79 track car is only coming apart so Turbo Todd can machine the connecting rods to open up that clearance. I'm also doing the same for the 944S engine I'm putting together. Even though it's a 100% street car.
The specifications for every stroker I've seen had wider side clearances than a stock engine.
IMHO it's a no-brainier to increase oil flow across the rod bearings, especially when you compare how tight the 928 tolerances are compared to other tried and proven performance engines.
A while ago I talked to Todd about adding an oil pressure sender after the rod bearings like the GM LS motors have. I think that would be very useful in a track car.
A while ago I talked to Todd about adding an oil pressure sender after the rod bearings like the GM LS motors have. I think that would be very useful in a track car.
Last edited by ptuomov; 04-30-2015 at 01:59 PM.
#64
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
It becomes a problem in stop-start freeway driving in the L.A. basin in the summer. Which I try never to do, but occasionally get caught in. You can sit and watch the oil pressure nudge downward. I am adding a virtual oil temp gauge into the flush console build so I can get a better feel for oil temps under various driving conditions. (I have a set of these hoses but pathetically have not yet installed them...)
about as hot as it gets out here in vegas..stop and go. Measured via a sender in the drain plug for the oil and on the crossover next to the stock sender for the water..
Id like to add an external cooler and ditch the radiator. car has a hard enough time staying cool let a lone cooling enigne oil also.
you also see why i added an aftermarket temp gauge.
My oil pressure gauge wasnt working at the time of this picture...it is now so i will be curious to see what the pressure shows. Never had the oil pressure light come on however.
#65
Nordschleife Master
Someone who knows their electronics should put an extra logic piece in the instrument cluster that would turn on the oil pressure warning light at different pressure at different rpms. 2 bars at 2000 rpm is probably enough, while 5 bars at 6700 rpm might indicate a problem.
#66
Rennlist Member
In a decade of racing I always saw oil temps skyrocket before coolant temp went up ... not the other way around. Bigger oil cooler and/or more air to cooler kept engine temps under control, as long as water coolant system was functioning correctly.
#67
Nordschleife Master
Bigger core for the stock oil cooler location
The stock external oil cooler looks like this:
Here's a post by Rob Edwards which has very detailed photos of the stock external oil cooler installed:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ml#post5216605
My question to you all is that has anyone installed a larger, dual pass oil cooler to the stock location? With dual pass, one could make the core much deeper as the tube behind the cooler would be no longer be required. The larger core would greatly increase the capacity of the core as a heat sink and reduce any oil temperature spikes. A simpler shroud could also be fabricated. Finally, if this were a kit, hose to run the oil in series thru the end tank and external coolers would make sense.
Here's a post by Rob Edwards which has very detailed photos of the stock external oil cooler installed:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ml#post5216605
My question to you all is that has anyone installed a larger, dual pass oil cooler to the stock location? With dual pass, one could make the core much deeper as the tube behind the cooler would be no longer be required. The larger core would greatly increase the capacity of the core as a heat sink and reduce any oil temperature spikes. A simpler shroud could also be fabricated. Finally, if this were a kit, hose to run the oil in series thru the end tank and external coolers would make sense.