Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

GTS tuning options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2013, 08:21 AM
  #16  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schocki
I would be very carefull with a good GTS engine. But these are just my 50 Cents...
Pick up an 87 block with squirters and boost away, selling the GTS motor to pay the way.

By the sounds of it he wants another 100 crank HP. This would be a low pressure turbo application (or mid pressure, depending on your definition) to which the 928 motor SHOULD hold up just fine. Head deck condition (no corrosion near the fire ring) should be a primary concern. Every head gasket failure I have seen on this board is due to that condition. Not saying that boosting didn't kill the head gasket, but it seems a little far fetched considering the quality of Porsche materials. I would be curious to see a failure mode on a head gasket that WASN'T related to the blowout under the fire ring caused by corrosion... anyone have pictures to help enlighten me?
Old 10-29-2013, 04:45 PM
  #17  
BIG 928
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BIG 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: birmingham england
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

im guessing another 100hp would put me back on the top spot, if i can use the extra power with the planned wheel/tyre mods.
anymore power would be good if reliable. just looking at all the options you are all suggesting!
i dont know the current hp. standard gts even the ecus, just a x pipe and equal length headers.

the budget should be be big once my old aircooled gt2 racer is sold. someone has nearly done a deal with us so fingers crossed. ive just got to buy a ring and pinion and ecu for my cayman racer then the 928 can get some $ spent on the old girl.

many thanks for all the replys and private messages
what a great place this is!
Old 10-29-2013, 06:54 PM
  #18  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Have a word with Adrian Clark, re strokers.
Old 10-29-2013, 06:59 PM
  #19  
MeanMachine
Three Wheelin'
 
MeanMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,548
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Stroker is the way to go.
Old 10-29-2013, 09:47 PM
  #20  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Have a word with Adrian Clark, re strokers.
I've heard that all strokers are not created equal....that there are good and bad ones of those, too.
Old 10-30-2013, 05:40 AM
  #21  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

s. After several ORR passes now made with the engine, from what I hear about the engine, it's now pretty much dead, needing another build (I have not been involved since the assembly).
Uh, let me clarify that George's motor is not "pretty much dead" unless George killed it since I saw it last a few weeks ago. George and I have had a bit of a struggle with an attempt to install some aftermarket cams. So, yes, it's not running at them moment, but there's no indication that it needs a complete rebuild from anything I have observed. It's still at 3-6% leakdown and seems generally quite healthy. I think that's a testament to the quality of Jim's original build.
Old 10-30-2013, 06:28 AM
  #22  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Yes, in fact a couple of engines. Fitted with Jenvey ITBs and using JDS ALpha system.

No reliabilty issues with the engine. Using GB sourced cranks and rods, 944S2 pistons.

Originally Posted by drnick
Did Adrian build a stroker? I know ITBs can be converted for use from an m5, this would be my next upgrade before considering either a stroker or forced induction. How many ponies are you making now?
Old 10-30-2013, 06:32 AM
  #23  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

A stroker with a stock intake would get you there......then if you need more power later, add JDS Alpha with M5 ITBs.

Originally Posted by BIG 928
im guessing another 100hp would put me back on the top spot, if i can use the extra power with the planned wheel/tyre mods.
anymore power would be good if reliable. just looking at all the options you are all suggesting!
Old 10-30-2013, 07:06 AM
  #24  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,230
Received 463 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

I've heard that all strokers are not created equal....that there are good and bad ones of those, too.

Who is creating the good and bad ones?
Ake
Old 10-30-2013, 01:55 PM
  #25  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,342
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Mark,

We made 438 rear wheel horsepower out of a 5.4 GTS engine. Using JDS Alfa-N and M5 ITBs. As far as I know, no one has made more bhp than us out of a standard size 928 engine using normal aspiration. Before we get into the argument, it was done on a Mustang Dyno - the most conservative of all conservative dynos.

Even when not running well due to cylinder galling, I was as fast as a 997TT on the staight at Brands. Should make even more bhp on the rebuild motor. The reason for the rebuild - JE Pistons are a bunch of lying barstewards, but that is a different topic all together... PM me if you need more details...

Btw, for all the others - Mark will not be allowed to Turbo or Supercharge his race car due to class rules...
Old 10-30-2013, 02:14 PM
  #26  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheburator
Btw, for all the others - Mark will not be allowed to Turbo or Supercharge his race car due to class rules...
That makes sense, because unrestricted forced induction would mean that no normally aspirated car would ever be competitive in the class.
Old 10-30-2013, 03:36 PM
  #27  
drnick
Drifting
 
drnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Alex, im not sure that was a fair comparison with the 997. Once your piston rings had scraped away the cylinder walls there was reduced friction
Old 10-30-2013, 06:27 PM
  #28  
jorj7
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jorj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,197
Received 54 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drnick
Alex, im not sure that was a fair comparison with the 997. Once your piston rings had scraped away the cylinder walls there was reduced friction
And probably increased displacement...


George
90 S4 Grand Prix White (Murf #5)
94 GTS 5-Speed Midnight Blue
06 Cayenne S Havanna/Sand Beige (PASM)
http://928.jorj7.com
Old 10-31-2013, 04:26 AM
  #29  
BIG 928
Racer
Thread Starter
 
BIG 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: birmingham england
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ill message you later alex thanks, gotta go to work now.
i would keep it 5.4 if i could get that sort of hp from bolt on parts like cams inlet etc. how i read the rules, i thought it just mentioned mulitplying the cc x 1.7 on forced induction cars to fit them into certain classes? i better take another look before i order x amount of parts i cant use!
thanks for the info as well john!
Old 10-31-2013, 12:17 PM
  #30  
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
 
Cheburator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,342
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BIG 928
ill message you later alex thanks, gotta go to work now.
i would keep it 5.4 if i could get that sort of hp from bolt on parts like cams inlet etc. how i read the rules, i thought it just mentioned mulitplying the cc x 1.7 on forced induction cars to fit them into certain classes? i better take another look before i order x amount of parts i cant use!
thanks for the info as well john!
Yes, you multiply by 1.7 - but you have to have the original engine type of aspiration - my brother and I wanted to race a G-Power Z3M Coupe with a supercharged 3.2 putting out 510bhp... It would have destroyed the field, given that it was actually built by G-Power - suspension, brakes, heigo cage, carbon body panels etc. and came 2nd at a wet Hockenheim in the 2003 Tuner's' Grand Prix, yet the CSCC said "NO WAY!" as the Z3MC was never supercharged from the factory...


Quick Reply: GTS tuning options



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:26 AM.