Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Supercharger/ignition timing questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2013, 11:45 PM
  #16  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,583
Received 2,200 Likes on 1,241 Posts
Default

Is the car that I saw at Sharktoberfest?
Old 08-23-2013, 11:48 PM
  #17  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Get the car running the correct way first with the super charger belt off
Old 08-24-2013, 12:39 AM
  #18  
Tim Murphy
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tim Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like an S3 car with an S4 intake.

By chance is this the wide body car once owned by Marcus? Used to be red but now is silver? I can't remember but this car might have lowered compression, not totally sure on that.

This sounds like the stepchild of a FAST and DeltaP pairing.

I can probably help you get this car going in the right direction but you will have to change a few things. 42lb injectors, S4 fuel regulator (get rid of the blue thing), Murf928 MAF adaptor, aluminum cast elbow with air straightener feeding into the MAF. Then Murf928 S3 chips and you should be really close if not right on.

The mechanical setup of the supercharger system might be another issue but that bridge can be crossed later.

Let me know if you would like my help.
Old 08-24-2013, 01:01 AM
  #19  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Sounds like you have enough info and enough to do.
If it is a "3 bar map sensor" you should be able to just set the timing map the way you want it, and the sensor should adjust your load/timing. But you know all this.
Ill just watch.
Old 08-24-2013, 01:12 AM
  #20  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Oh man, Marcus in LA
Old 08-24-2013, 02:31 AM
  #21  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tim Murphy
By chance is this the wide body car once owned by Marcus? Used to be red but now is silver? I can't remember but this car might have lowered compression, not totally sure on that.
If it is that car, the last configuration that I'm aware of had lowered compression forged pistons, and it wasn't 6 liters. If I remember correctly, it was 5.7 liters, and at that point was at least the third engine to be going into the car.

Originally Posted by Tim Murphy
This sounds like the stepchild of a FAST and DeltaP pairing.
In addition to some other hands that have been in there as well that really shouldn't have been. There were a number of things done on this car that I sure wouldn't recommend, at least not to anybody I like. Some people really should not be working on this kind of stuff without supervision by someone who actually has an idea of what's really going on, and is aware of the implications of what they're doing.

There's really a good bit more to keeping the engine in one piece than simply retarding timing. Installing a MAP sensor somehow, or some of the knock sensor systems that I've seen for sale in different places, can easily result in nothing more than a false sense of security. I do find something like the **** on the dash to adjust ignition timing at will interesting though. Do you determine the optimum adjustment by turning the **** to increase timing until the engine blows up, then turn the **** back maybe a quarter turn or so?

When it's suggested that an owner ship a car to someone who knows what they're doing in a situation like this one, people often balk at the idea because of the cost. I wonder how much time and money has been put into this car so far. I can guarantee it's a lot more than what it would have cost to to have it done properly the first time, by someone who knows what they're doing, even if that would have required shipping the car to the other side of the earth and back.
Old 08-24-2013, 02:35 AM
  #22  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,058
Received 310 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
...
Apparently, John Speake makes an EZK box with a map sensor, so that the brain can detect boost and then make changes in timing, when under boost.
Is this what people are using....or are they (you) just running stock timing, at boost.......and praying?
EZF, not EZK. The EZF uses engine vacuum as the vertical 'load" axis for the main ignition map, from 0 to 1 bar (vacuum to atmospheric pressure). For NA engines this works fine. But with boost that doesn't give you any ability to retard timing at higher pressures.

For boosted applications John can supply a modified EZF with a 0-2 bar sensor, and rescaled maps for Sharktuner, which allow tuning ignition up to 2.0 bar (about 15 psi).

The EZK uses a load signal from the LH, which is derived from the MAF. This removes the 1.0 bar limitation.

But you knew all that.
Old 08-24-2013, 06:01 AM
  #23  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Yes, we can supply a 2 BAR MAP sensor mod for the 85/86 EZ-F ignition ECUs. ALso a SMAF option for higher power....
Old 08-24-2013, 06:09 AM
  #24  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

As with any SC application. Do a leak down...compression test..etc... find out what you have to work with, if anything. Get it running in some sort normally aspirated form first.... Cut the belt..take it off..what ever...just get it running with out the blower first. Should be easy enough to remove and get to back to some sort of stock intake set up. Then start chasing the gremlins. Gawwd knows what kind of airleaks you may have...or as you have seen, wrong wiring connections.

Start with a clean slate..even if it means going back a few steps.... but I think this car has issues deeper than just a bolted on supercharger.
I think you will be chasing your tail until you get to the bottom of the puking coolant and gassy oil issue.
Old 08-24-2013, 09:07 AM
  #25  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

If 19 psi you will need a 3 bar map sensor in the ezf.
2 bar (absolute) is only good to 14.7 psi of boost.

I personally prefer the seimens deka 4 60# injectors.
They have great properties, reasonably priced and respond beautifully.
I agree that an S4 fpr is required.

At 19 psi they MUST have an inter cooler and you will need to monitor intake temps for tuning. I would be starting at around 10 deg of max advance under that much boost. Listening for detonation and turning it up/down from there.

Also I hope that it is just the S4 intake and not the heads! And if S4 heads then I hope that they put S4 or 951 pistons in it or the CR is going to be silly high.

Also talk to Brendan about the possibility of running E85.......
Old 08-24-2013, 09:30 AM
  #26  
RonnyÅ
Advanced
 
RonnyÅ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ketchmi
I am running a stock 89' 5.0 (with thicker .074 cometic headgaskets) using 42# injectors and the Super FMU with a 7-1 disk. At 15.5psi it turns 630rwhp with an auto. I don't pull any ignition at all and experience no knocks while maintaining a 12.5/1 afr at full boost. Granted, that's at 4400' altitude which does help a bit. BTW, this is being revamped due to 120ish psi fuel pressure at full boost. I built this one before the availability of a sharktuner. It actually idles great at just under 30psi static with 42# injectors.

I'm willing to bet that you are nowhere near 19psi as I am running the largest counter rotating straight outlet Vortech they make (V7Ysi) on this setup and it's maxed out at 15.5psi on a lowly 5.0 (once again at this altitude). I doubt that it is using the V7Ysi as I had to do a lot of "relocating" to fit this one. Let me know what model Vortech you are using, the pulley size and if you can find the disk size in the "great big blue" regulator (probably a Vortech Super FMU) and I can give you some help making it right.
.
Do you have a thread about your car or engine? What torq? rpm? Dynopapers?
It's cool to see that the engines actually makes that much. And that you dont need to change rods or pistons.
Old 08-24-2013, 11:16 AM
  #27  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'm sure I posted a dyno sheet on it at 12psi when it only did 545rwhp, it's on here somewhere. We built it for a customer that ended up being scared of it so we bought it from him.

There is one gentleman on here that has a twin turbo that is trying to find the top limit of horsepower on a stock engine, he is 120hp above mine and still pushing.

I don't want to take this thread off topic very far, PM me for details. And now, back to your regular programming...
Old 08-24-2013, 11:44 AM
  #28  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

If this is Marcus's car, we should set up a viewing for all the old hacks that were around at the time, including myself.
Old 08-25-2013, 12:15 PM
  #29  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z
If it is that car, the last configuration that I'm aware of had lowered compression forged pistons, and it wasn't 6 liters. If I remember correctly, it was 5.7 liters, and at that point was at least the third engine to be going into the car.


In addition to some other hands that have been in there as well that really shouldn't have been. There were a number of things done on this car that I sure wouldn't recommend, at least not to anybody I like. Some people really should not be working on this kind of stuff without supervision by someone who actually has an idea of what's really going on, and is aware of the implications of what they're doing.

There's really a good bit more to keeping the engine in one piece than simply retarding timing. Installing a MAP sensor somehow, or some of the knock sensor systems that I've seen for sale in different places, can easily result in nothing more than a false sense of security. I do find something like the **** on the dash to adjust ignition timing at will interesting though. Do you determine the optimum adjustment by turning the **** to increase timing until the engine blows up, then turn the **** back maybe a quarter turn or so?

When it's suggested that an owner ship a car to someone who knows what they're doing in a situation like this one, people often balk at the idea because of the cost. I wonder how much time and money has been put into this car so far. I can guarantee it's a lot more than what it would have cost to to have it done properly the first time, by someone who knows what they're doing, even if that would have required shipping the car to the other side of the earth and back.
The manual adjustment system should be used with a knock sensor. At leat it's an signition system that uses manifod pressure and not just a guess programmed into the maps. It's a pigiback system meant to be used on ECU that are not designed for boost sensing.
Old 08-26-2013, 03:33 PM
  #30  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the suggestions and offers of assistance (Tim, Dave).

Obviously, this engine/vehicle combination was built several years back and tuned with what tools existed back then (nothing). The car has 30 pound injectors and a fuel pressure regulator that apparently has the ability to dump additional fuel under boost. I'm guessing that the 30 pound injectors were the biggest that the original builder could use and still allow the car to idle.....therefore, this is what the car got. Pretty obvious that the fuel flow through 30 pound injectors isn't going to "feed" this engine, at WOT. With the reduced compression, it might not "burn it up", but it certainly isn't going to run its best, at WOT.

Obviously, things have changed over the years, and there a now components that are more appropriate for use on this engine. The ability to change the programming on both the EZF (thanks for the correction, Jim) and the ECU also helps considerably. The work that John Speake has done allows everyone in the 928 community to now tune their engines, once the "basic" components are present.

Also obvious is that there are a couple (few) things that need to be repaired before we even begin to worry about tuning....things like the radiator leak and intake leak.

The other obvious thing that needs to be added is a fuel pump/fuel system big enough to "feed" enough fuel to the front of the vehicle. Certainly, a good "stock" pump will feed the 30 pound injectors....but that is about all.


Quick Reply: Supercharger/ignition timing questions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:17 PM.