Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

ZDDP in oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2012, 08:17 PM
  #61  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,815
Received 238 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Don't ask me, I plead ignorance, I use Valvoline. Their site has full info and a "selection tool". And you can get it just about anywhere.


Originally Posted by Jadz928
That's the exact reason I switched to Brad Penn. I don't want to keep checking. This is coming from someone who'd used Mobile product for years.

I have too much going on to have to "keep up" on changes to oil.

For the amount of oil changes I do, availability and price of BP thru Jegs works for me.
What makes you so certain BP would never change formula?
depami is online now  
Old 11-13-2012, 08:42 PM
  #62  
jayc67
Rennlist Member
 
jayc67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What makes you so certain BP would never change formula?
Certainly anyone can change their formula but BP's target market is not the mass consumer, bending to whatever marketing scheme is hot that week. They target the race car types who like consistency. It's an old school "boutique" oil and not very likely to change I don't expect, it would just **** off the majority of their customers. The local dirt track parts shop close to me sells it in huge quantities. I buy a case and the counter guy is usually surprised I'm "only buying 1 case". I guess the racers use a lot
jayc67 is offline  
Old 11-13-2012, 10:13 PM
  #63  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Does anyone have any concerns about the fact that Brad Penn is a semi-synthetic blend oil instead of a full synthetic?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
dprantl is offline  
Old 11-13-2012, 10:15 PM
  #64  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Does anyone have any concerns about the fact that Brad Penn is a semi-synthetic blend oil instead of a full synthetic?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Nope
SeanR is offline  
Old 11-13-2012, 10:23 PM
  #65  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Does anyone have any concerns about the fact that Brad Penn is a semi-synthetic blend oil instead of a full synthetic?
Nope

If it was 100% non-synthetic I would still use it.
hacker-pschorr is offline  
Old 11-13-2012, 10:58 PM
  #66  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,690
Received 127 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

What makes you so certain BP would never change formula?
Originally Posted by jayc67
Certainly anyone can change their formula but BP's target market is not the mass consumer, bending to whatever marketing scheme is hot that week. They target the race car types who like consistency. It's an old school "boutique" oil and not very likely to change I don't expect, it would just **** off the majority of their customers. The local dirt track parts shop close to me sells it in huge quantities. I buy a case and the counter guy is usually surprised I'm "only buying 1 case". I guess the racers use a lot
What he said. Plus I'll add that BP labels their product "contain high levels of zinc/phosphorus " Nothing cryptic or confusing about that.


Re synth vs semi-synth... there are many oil stating synth, that are bore from dino oil. At least BP is straight about it.
Jadz928 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:39 AM
  #67  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by depami
Don't ask me, I plead ignorance, I use Valvoline.
I like Valvoline oils, but they only have 830PPM of ZDDP in their syn, and maxlife. Generally, that's not enough. There are products with 900PPM, but we like 1100-1200 for our engines.
docmirror is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 12:58 AM
  #68  
JET951
Drifting
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,640
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

My question is } why do the latest & greatest this century so called synthetic engine oils have any last century ( read Dino solution) ZDDP at all ?, ZDDP is not just last century , but well back into last century oil additive for Dino oils

It gets even worse with Racing so called synthetic engine oils that have a lot more ZDDP , don't get me wrong I do not mean worse in regards to how effective ZDDP is( its very effective) , I mean in regards to so called synthetic engine oils in this century , I would of thought that they would not need any of this AW addtitive or any additive for that matter at all

Why do they need an anti wear additive ? , I thought that the idea of so called sythetic engine oil was an massive advancement over the last century Dino oil , meaning keeping metal parts away from each other . like high loaded flat tappet overhead cams as an example

Or if they still need an anti wear additive ( AW package) , why not just have this century replacement AW package of say Boron or something similar only & no ZDDP ? .

So we would then read in advertising literature that "X" oil company racing oil has extra Boron AW package & no ZDDP

I kept reading from the early part of this century that ZDDP was being phased out & or obsolete , so this leads me to wondering why so called synthetic engine oils can not stand on their own two feet & not having to rely on a last century AW additive ( ZDDP )or any AW additive for that matter ?

In my humble opinion , its a bit disappointing
JET951 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 01:41 AM
  #69  
polecat702
Vegas, Baby!
Rennlist Member


 
polecat702's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: far away
Posts: 11,535
Received 380 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Use any oil you like, just add a bottle of Rislone 4405, ZDDP oil suppliment .
Whats the big deal?
polecat702 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 05:09 AM
  #70  
Charley B
Rennlist Member
 
Charley B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Patterson, Ca
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Use any oil you like, I'm getting old and I just don't care anymore.
Charley B is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 07:53 AM
  #71  
M. Requin
Rennlist Member
 
M. Requin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 3,625
Received 60 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror
I like Valvoline oils, but they only have 830PPM of ZDDP in their syn, and maxlife. Generally, that's not enough. There are products with 900PPM, but we like 1100-1200 for our engines.
Not so. Here are the specs from the Valvoline Web site for the ZDDP 20w-50 VR-1 full synthetic I use: 0.14/0.13. That's about as high as I have found. The Product Information sheet is here:

http://www.valvoline.com/pdf/vr1_synthetic.pdf
M. Requin is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 08:10 AM
  #72  
curtisr
Rennlist Member
 
curtisr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,716
Received 76 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charley B
How have you accomplished observing foaming, or lack thereof, while running Rotella?
Charley,

When I use Quaker State conventional oil in my DD (a Chev S10) I find a foam build-up on the bottom face of the oil filler cap. Using the same 'test' with Rotella, I detect a noticable absence of foam.

RC
curtisr is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 09:37 AM
  #73  
KLVA
Burning Brakes
 
KLVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Woodbridge, VA.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default VR-1

Originally Posted by M. Requin
Not so. Here are the specs from the Valvoline Web site for the ZDDP 20w-50 VR-1 full synthetic I use: 0.14/0.13. That's about as high as I have found. The Product Information sheet is here:

http://www.valvoline.com/pdf/vr1_synthetic.pdf


Thanks Martin....just confirms what I have been thinking

I have been putting Valvoline VR-1 20w50 in the 928's for over a year

The bottle just changed labeling recently to state the it may

affect catalytic converters with long term use...did not say that last month...

Nice to finally have some info on ZDDP levels in the oil
KLVA is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 10:19 AM
  #74  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by polecat702
Use any oil you like, just add a bottle of Rislone 4405, ZDDP oil suppliment .
Whats the big deal?
Because the combined additive package can be just as important as the ZDDP.

Also, even the highest additive has about 2,000ppm per bottle, usually 3/4 of a quart (if not 1/2 a quart).
You need to divide up that ZDDP over 10 quarts the 928 holds. If you are starting with an 800ppm (or lower) motor oil, the additive will not bring you anywhere near the 1,300ppm (or higher) ZDDP that most are looking for.

Honestly this whole conversation is rather moot. I have only found ONE 15w-50 or 20w-50 motor oil currently on the market (in the US) with less than 1100ppm ZDDP, and it's special order.
Unless you live in the great white north and drive your 928 to your igloo with some super thin oil in the sump, it's not as big of a concern that it use to be. If I'm incorrect in my research, please post what oil that is so we can all avoid it.

The controversy started with the GF-4 standard (now GF-5) which dropped ZDDP from the 1100 range to 800 in an effort to save catalytic converters. At the same time, most auto's in the US dropped their recommended viscosity's down to the 0w-30 range.
Yes Mobil 1 did drop the ZDDP in 15w-50 at first, they eventually realized what a bone head move that was and brought the old formula back to the shelves.

If you look at the Mobil 1 spreadsheet that has been posted a few times in this thread. All the oils with 800ppm or less are labelled GL-4.


Originally Posted by xschop
The higher the ZDDP content, the faster your cats will clog.
That's still open for debate. Later studies have shown those findings may have been a bit premature.

Same as the R-12 vs R134a BS. We now know R134a is as bad if not worse than R-12 (not only can it eat away at the atmosphere, it causes cancer). Which is why the EU is banning it.
hacker-pschorr is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 10:50 AM
  #75  
Kiln_Red
Rennlist Member
 
Kiln_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 1,494
Received 216 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Yes Mobil 1 did drop the ZDDP in 15w-50 at first, they eventually realized what a bone head move that was and brought the old formula back to the shelves.
I'm not trying to be argumentative here but I worry about the validity of this statement.

It appears to me that Mobil 1 dropped 15w-50, for a short time, when they reduced the ZDDP of other viscosities. They did so considering the formula outdated since flat tappet cams have become a engineering design of the past. I am not finding any information that they reduced ZDDP in 15w-50. That would abandon what knowledge they had already gained in that flat tappet engines require higher ZDDP oils.
Kiln_Red is offline  


Quick Reply: ZDDP in oil



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:35 PM.