Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

What HP can you expect from a unmodded S4?

Old 09-27-2012, 08:25 PM
  #16  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based on having seen somewhere easily over a thousand 928 dyno pulls, on a DynoJet, SAE corrected, not counting spikes from misses or lifting abruptly, no funny business manipulating the correction factors, very typical numbers are:

S4 5-speed- 265-270rwhp
S4 Automatic - 250-255rwhp

Some people are probably better off not dynoing their cars. I saw one car that looked great. The owner didn't have much or any experience with other 928s, thought the engine was in great condition and running strong. It wasn't. Slowest S4 I've ever seen. He was happy until he saw the dyno numbers. It did 175rwhp. Sometimes ignorance really is bliss.
Old 09-27-2012, 08:29 PM
  #17  
jorj7
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jorj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,196
Received 53 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Mine was 262-263 rwhp on a Dynojet when I first got it (ie stock). Later dynoed 251-252 rwhp on a DynaPack while still stock.
Old 09-27-2012, 08:32 PM
  #18  
killav
Rennlist Member
 
killav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 1,534
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z
Some people are probably better off not dynoing their cars. I saw one car that looked great. The owner didn't have much or any experience with other 928s, thought the engine was in great condition and running strong. It wasn't. Slowest S4 I've ever seen. He was happy until he saw the dyno numbers. It did 175rwhp. Sometimes ignorance really is bliss.
Good gracious, to get down that low on an S4 would take bad hall sensors, knock sensors, faulty flappy, way jacked up cam timing, clogged cats, bad MAF, vacume leaks and God knows what else.....
Old 09-27-2012, 09:05 PM
  #19  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

My 89 S4 auto bone stock except RMB (minimal to zero effect) was consistently 262 RWHP on a Dynapac over a couple of years at about 130-150K miles. I've seen as low as 250 and as high as 270 RWHP on decent S4 autos.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:32 PM
  #20  
rgs944
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Most of them are going to be 255-275 at the high end. Mine, after lots of going through and mods only did 289hp and 301tq. This was before the GTS intake and spacers but I doubt very much it added more than one or two.
Sean you are talking about wheel right?
Old 09-27-2012, 09:37 PM
  #21  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
I yanked 289rwhp from a 88S4, fresh after a top-end refresh, Xpipe, 89+ resonators, RMB on a Dynojet and mild early sharktuning.
I personally think that is a "bit" optimistic, for an automatic, from what I've measured, but not by much.

I would think that if you got an "exceptional" engine, with everything at the "high end" of factory specifications, that might be real.
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 09-27-2012, 09:38 PM
  #22  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
250-265 rwhp.
Yup. Completely agree.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:41 PM
  #23  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by killav
Good gracious, to get down that low on an S4 would take bad hall sensors, knock sensors, faulty flappy, way jacked up cam timing, clogged cats, bad MAF, vacume leaks and God knows what else.....
See end of post 16.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:46 PM
  #24  
rgs944
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So it sounds like around 260 at the wheels and close to 300 at the crank would be a likely average.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:51 PM
  #25  
928 at last
Rennlist Member
 
928 at last's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,200
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I pulled 260 rwhp, best of three, 267.5 torque, stock. (With the top end refresh, and new sensors).
77 degrees farenheit, 28% humidity, 28.94 in.hg pressure....10:27 in the morning, engine fully heat soaked.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:53 PM
  #26  
928 at last
Rennlist Member
 
928 at last's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,200
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Figure 20%

Originally Posted by rgs944
So it sounds like around 260 at the wheels and close to 300 at the crank would be a likely average.
Figure on 20% parasitic loss throught the tranny, so roughly 325 chp.
Old 09-27-2012, 09:58 PM
  #27  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I pulled 267 on a dynapack in my now-sold 88 auto, which had a refreshed 89 motor with about 4k miles since the rebuild at the time, bone stock.
Old 09-27-2012, 11:27 PM
  #28  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,039
Received 291 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rgs944
Rather than clog up someone else's thread I want to know what people think a factory correct S4 has nowdays. Let's say it has 125K and has just had intake refresh, tune up, and everything else reasonable to bring it back up to spec and drivable condition. No mods yet. Do you think under 300 or over 300?
Wait a minute, aren't you the same guy who's been saying that he wasn't going to dyno his car because he didn't care about numbers?

I'm not giving you a hard time (much), and please don't dump a pile of crap all over me again. I'm just saying that your sudden interest in horsepower numbers is kind of amusing.

It doesn't matter what people "think" horsepower is, it is something that can be measured. The factory spec for the S4 (brand-new everything) was 316 bhp, that is SAE horsepower measured at the crank. If you take that number and figure 15% loss with a 5-speed that gives you around 270rwhp, and a Rogerbox with 18% loss would be around 260rwhp, that's rear-wheel hp on a chassis dyno with SAE correction. Which is pretty consistent with what's been reported here and elsewhere. So I think the factory number for the S4 is pretty good, on average. (GT's are different, but that's not what you asked).

That's for a new car. A 25-year-old car will be lower, depending on what sort of condition it is in. "Refreshing" the things that need refreshing is helpful, but doesn't add any horsepower-- it just gets you back towards where the car started. And don't overlook the MAF, it is the key component for fueling.

As for power-adders, don't believe everything that you read. Many folks report big numbers for x-pipes, but remember that they are swapping cats as well as adding the crossover. An x-pipe with new 100-cell cats (or no cats) will certainly outperform a set of melted, clogged factory cats. I do not know of anyone who has done the apples-to-apples comparison and just added the x-pipe without changing cats. I am not saying that x-pipes don't add hp, they do. But doing a proper before/after is not simple.

Will you be at Sharktoberfest? I think there is a dyno in Anaheim.

Last edited by jcorenman; 09-28-2012 at 01:47 AM. Reason: speling
Old 09-27-2012, 11:44 PM
  #29  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rgs944
Sean you are talking about wheel right?
Yes. Btw, my "before" dyno was a dead 250hp. This was before x-pipe and intake refresh. After was the 289.
Old 09-27-2012, 11:47 PM
  #30  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Here a 'BEFORE" dyno sheet from a 1990 928 S4 (auto) with an x-pipe and no cats. This is the same dyno that i used last weekend where I posted 490HP.
Attached Images

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: What HP can you expect from a unmodded S4?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:32 PM.