Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

S4 intake manifold pressure chart or map

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2012, 02:27 AM
  #16  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,947
Received 147 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
Incorrect. Completely different relationship to BHP measured at the crank and what of that number is being "consumed".

100s of HP difference at 18psi on a 928 motor. 28psi required to make 675 on a blower, and 18psi on a turbo is making 720.
It would be interesting to see your numbers on an actual dyno.

From what ive seen in my limited experience. WCGT NSX with blower vs turbo, and the Rylan s2000 supercharger vs turbo . (both adding blowers on known engines with no other mods), there wasnt that disparity in HP gains.

I thnk rylan got 520rwhp (near 600hp) with a 2.2 liter and 28psi.

are you talking centrifugal or whipple driven blowers?
Old 09-06-2012, 06:48 AM
  #17  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Oh cool. Haven't seen a SCer vs turbo debate for a long time! Anybody have some talking monkeys?
Old 09-06-2012, 11:18 AM
  #18  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,145
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

It isn't a debate so much as just making sure the kibort--world-fact can stays firmly closed.
Old 09-06-2012, 01:28 PM
  #19  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,947
Received 147 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
It isn't a debate so much as just making sure the kibort--world-fact can stays firmly closed.
Hey, this is an area where I have very limited knowledge, i admit. Ive just seen less disparity. thats it. In fact, when speed world challenge was looking at boost limits for the RS6, RS4, NSX, 911, S2000, they didnt have the disparity between types of blowers as you would indicate would be needed for equivilance.

If what you are saying is true..... then, you are saying turbo vs supercharger is almost equivilant to the power gains of one full atmosphere pressure! or in otherwords, the losses on the blower equal to almost 1 full atmosphere!
if you have the PROOF, which i always provide i my debates or discussions, lets see it. or if it has been beat to death before , as AO has pointed too, point me to a thread. Im interested in it, but its not my world. (cept for the little boost devices. )
Old 09-06-2012, 11:49 PM
  #20  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Mark, for most supercharges we make between 15 to 20 RWHP per pound of boost, net. But we consume about 30hp in driving the belt. If we didn't have to power a belt, we would see more hp per psi.

The turbos, however, don't have the same parasitic loss like the SCers, so they often have more hp per psi compared to a SCer. That's not to say it doesn't take some power to drive the turbo, because it does. But it's on the exhaust side where we typically do not worry about it as much.
Old 09-07-2012, 04:36 PM
  #21  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,145
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

In testing on a Dyno simulation software, a belt driven Centrifugal supercharger is consuming 250hp at around 700hp. Turbos do not consume this much.

The data for a 5L engine at 28psi on a supercharger and 15-16psi on a turbo is verified fact.



Quick Reply: S4 intake manifold pressure chart or map



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:56 AM.