Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

ARP Head Stud Torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011 | 11:25 PM
  #1  
toofast928's Avatar
toofast928
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 1
From: N NJ
Default ARP Head Stud Torque

The stud, not the nut. What is the torque you guys use? 20 ft lbs? 60 ft lbs?
Old 12-08-2011 | 03:15 AM
  #2  
Imo000's Avatar
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,846
Likes: 340
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

Since they are not stock parts, what does APR recomend?
Old 12-08-2011 | 03:29 AM
  #3  
Lizard928's Avatar
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,600
Likes: 34
From: Abbotsford B.C.
Default

Returning them, and getting Simard to make you a set.
Old 12-08-2011 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
toofast928's Avatar
toofast928
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 1
From: N NJ
Default

ok thanks,
I've used these before before with good results.

Imre good idea.

Has anybody else run a torque on the head studs of a 16v?
Old 12-08-2011 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

Originally Posted by toofast928
ok thanks,
I've used these before before with good results.

Imre good idea.

Has anybody else run a torque on the head studs of a 16v?
Pretty sure you are one of the few that have had any luck with them.
You might want to do a search on them, it seems several of them have failed.
Old 12-08-2011 | 11:08 AM
  #6  
dcrasta's Avatar
dcrasta
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: Washington "Dc"
Default

ARP's I have used (but on steel block motors) go in finger tight (or 1/8 of a turn with the hex wrench on top). You do not want 'crank' them down (Studs). Put the stud in dry . Use the ARP lube on the nut.

But search for the ARP usage on the 928s. Some people claim they do not work well with Al blocks.

I have never personally used ARP studs on Porsche engines, but on the Mitsubishi motors I have built they are top rate.
Old 12-08-2011 | 12:44 PM
  #7  
928er's Avatar
928er
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

I've used the ARP under some pretty hard use with no problems.
Old 12-08-2011 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling
I've used the ARP under some pretty hard use with no problems.
I thought Greg Brown had some issues with them, maybe I spoke to soon.
I have used ARP bolts and studs for American stuff with no issues.
Old 12-09-2011 | 04:07 AM
  #9  
slate blue's Avatar
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling
I've used the ARP under some pretty hard use with no problems.
I concur, never had any trouble in a 928 engine, I used the cold torque technique that is used in many racing circles, I did in fact see a NASCAR study on this, it was able verify the extra clamp force it can provide.

To answer your question about how to install, don't bottom them out. In fact when you go to install, get all the studs at the same and correct height you will see that installed height will not bottom the stud out. Try to ensure the threads in the block are clean too. The studs should screw in easily.

I coated my studs with lanolin (sheep wool grease) so that they have some corrosion resistance, I have pulled out studs from the factory and they were so corroded that they almost broke removing them despite me heating the block etc along with various other measures to try and loosen them.

Some studs these days have an allen key head to hold them in place while they are initially torqued. I use them with their hardened washers and multi point nuts.
Old 12-09-2011 | 05:04 AM
  #10  
GregBBRD's Avatar
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,230
Likes: 2,481
From: Anaheim
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
I thought Greg Brown had some issues with them, maybe I spoke to soon.
I have used ARP bolts and studs for American stuff with no issues.
I've not tried these on a 928 engine. I was never able to make them work on 951 engines and had much better results with the Porsche pieces. I believe that Chris Cervelli (Chris is way, way smarter than me and worked extensively on the 951 engines) also came to the same conclusion. We communicated about this, at length, and we came up with the idea that the ARP hardware was of such high quality that it didn't "stretch" enough to properly keep the head "clamped" onto the block.

I have no "raw" data to support this idea. Just a lot of failed head gaskets which made us try and come up with an idea that explained the problem.

ARP seemed to think that the problem was that we were not going back and retorquing the studs after the engine was warmed up, the first time. Note that the proceedure to be able to retorque the head (on a 16 valve engine) requires removing the cam carriers. Not all that much fun on a 928 engine. (Understatement.)

The 928 engine seems to have a much lower percentage of head gasket failures than the 951 engine and these pieces may work perfectly, in this application. However, if you read the ARP literature carefully, I think that they do still strongly suggest retorquing the hardware. If that isn't enough to scare you away from using this stuff on a 928 application, you've got way more time on your hands than I do.
Old 12-09-2011 | 08:56 AM
  #11  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

I could have sworn you had some issues with the studs, thanks for setting me straight.

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I've not tried these on a 928 engine. I was never able to make them work on 951 engines and had much better results with the Porsche pieces. I believe that Chris Cervelli (Chris is way, way smarter than me and worked extensively on the 951 engines) also came to the same conclusion. We communicated about this, at length, and we came up with the idea that the ARP hardware was of such high quality that it didn't "stretch" enough to properly keep the head "clamped" onto the block.

I have no "raw" data to support this idea. Just a lot of failed head gaskets which made us try and come up with an idea that explained the problem.

ARP seemed to think that the problem was that we were not going back and retorquing the studs after the engine was warmed up, the first time. Note that the proceedure to be able to retorque the head (on a 16 valve engine) requires removing the cam carriers. Not all that much fun on a 928 engine. (Understatement.)

The 928 engine seems to have a much lower percentage of head gasket failures than the 951 engine and these pieces may work perfectly, in this application. However, if you read the ARP literature carefully, I think that they do still strongly suggest retorquing the hardware. If that isn't enough to scare you away from using this stuff on a 928 application, you've got way more time on your hands than I do.
Old 12-09-2011 | 10:39 AM
  #12  
blown 87's Avatar
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 2
From: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I've not tried these on a 928 engine. I was never able to make them work on 951 engines and had much better results with the Porsche pieces. I believe that Chris Cervelli (Chris is way, way smarter than me and worked extensively on the 951 engines) also came to the same conclusion. We communicated about this, at length, and we came up with the idea that the ARP hardware was of such high quality that it didn't "stretch" enough to properly keep the head "clamped" onto the block.

I have no "raw" data to support this idea. Just a lot of failed head gaskets which made us try and come up with an idea that explained the problem.

ARP seemed to think that the problem was that we were not going back and retorquing the studs after the engine was warmed up, the first time. Note that the proceedure to be able to retorque the head (on a 16 valve engine) requires removing the cam carriers. Not all that much fun on a 928 engine. (Understatement.)

The 928 engine seems to have a much lower percentage of head gasket failures than the 951 engine and these pieces may work perfectly, in this application. However, if you read the ARP literature carefully, I think that they do still strongly suggest retorquing the hardware. If that isn't enough to scare you away from using this stuff on a 928 application, you've got way more time on your hands than I do.

Here is where I got that from, in this thread you were asked "Why not use the ARP studs?"

I have taken out the extra stuff, so this is the answer you gave.


Originally Posted by danglerb

Should we be thinking about switching to a fancy new stud like ARP?


Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Not a snowball's chance.

I was unfortunate enough to be building 944 Turbo engines when ARP started making studs for those engines.

The head gasket problems got much worse, when using those studs, than the original studs ever were. On top of that, they insisted that you re-torque the studs once the engine got ran through a heat cycle. Pulling the cam carrier off a 944 is not much fun, just to retorque the hardware. Pulling both cam carriers off a 928, to retorque the head nuts, isn't ever going to happen, in my shop....I can barely stant to do it once, per engine.

The Porsche hardware stretches, by design. This keeps the head "clamped" to the block as the engine warms up and cools down...it is always clamped. The ARP hardware is very high quality and doesn't stretch much. The "clamping" doesn't work as well. The result is more blown gasakets...not less!

I've got huge box of ARP hardware that I've removed out of 944 engines, around here, somewhere. Scrap metal.
Old 12-09-2011 | 11:06 AM
  #13  
Mike Simard's Avatar
Mike Simard
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
and we came up with the idea that the ARP hardware was of such high quality that it didn't "stretch" enough to properly keep the head "clamped" onto the block.
Steel being hard is easy to do and is not a sign of high quality.

There's no way that a mass produced aftermarket stud is going to be able to clamp reliably through the range of heat changes after being heat treated to production averages and installed by various shmoes using a variety of torque wrenches.
This is a recipe for broken parts and head gasket issues. These things get installed to horribly inadequate tightening amounts and when the parts break it's always something else blamed because nobody understands fasteners.
"Why it must be such amazing power building skills that things break, if I didn't smartly use ARP studs it would be even worse!"
Old 12-09-2011 | 11:16 AM
  #14  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

Mike - Are you still making your head studs? I may as well use them as the same block has your main studs. I'll take out the arp studs somehow, maybe one at a time or something, and replace them with yours. I also need the rest of the clutch stuff - I think its just the hydraulic throw out bearing casing. I have to find some more stuff here to sell to pay for your shiny metal car parts (crack cocaine).

What is your torque sequence for your head studs?
Old 12-09-2011 | 11:28 AM
  #15  
Fabio421's Avatar
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,722
Likes: 11
From: Florida, USA
Default

Mike Simard, don't you offer a head stud alternative to the factory studs and ARP? Would you mind explaining ( or linking ) what makes them superior?

Thanks


Quick Reply: ARP Head Stud Torque



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:58 AM.