Still running too hot
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Still running too hot
Hi folks,
A while back I installed a Murf kit in my '88 S4. Not wanting to pull my louvers and louver motor, I went with two 11" pushers fans in front instead of the recommended 16" pusher fan. The kit comes with 4 8" (? or maybe 9") puller fans, but no pusher fan(s).
Anyway, since the install, the car's been running hot under most circumstances, and the six fans running, with water wetter in the system, still hasn't been enough to keep it cool in traffic in summer with the A/C on.
I was thinking of trying to build a 928Motorsports style air intake to try to reduce the amount of radiator surface blocked by the air intake box of the Vortech, but, after looking closer at the system, I don't think that's my real problem.
All of the electric fans are mounted directly against the radiator, with no shrouds other than the cage that's part of the fan itself. This means that the hubs of the fans, which don't allow airflow, are right up against the radiator. For the six fans, this adds up to 87 square inches of blocked radiator from one side or the other. I would think that this would tend to reduce the efficiency of the cooling system quite a bit.
I'm not sure whether I have enough room to offset and shroud both of the pusher fans... I may need to remove one and reposition the other; but on the back side, I certainly have room to back the fans up about 2/3" and shroud them with a bit of a box. What do you folks think? Would that be worthwhile, or does the hub blocking half the area of the fan not really make that much difference?
Oh, BTW, I did verify that when very hot, the louvers are fully open, and the fans are getting full battery voltage.
Thanks,
Paul
A while back I installed a Murf kit in my '88 S4. Not wanting to pull my louvers and louver motor, I went with two 11" pushers fans in front instead of the recommended 16" pusher fan. The kit comes with 4 8" (? or maybe 9") puller fans, but no pusher fan(s).
Anyway, since the install, the car's been running hot under most circumstances, and the six fans running, with water wetter in the system, still hasn't been enough to keep it cool in traffic in summer with the A/C on.
I was thinking of trying to build a 928Motorsports style air intake to try to reduce the amount of radiator surface blocked by the air intake box of the Vortech, but, after looking closer at the system, I don't think that's my real problem.
All of the electric fans are mounted directly against the radiator, with no shrouds other than the cage that's part of the fan itself. This means that the hubs of the fans, which don't allow airflow, are right up against the radiator. For the six fans, this adds up to 87 square inches of blocked radiator from one side or the other. I would think that this would tend to reduce the efficiency of the cooling system quite a bit.
I'm not sure whether I have enough room to offset and shroud both of the pusher fans... I may need to remove one and reposition the other; but on the back side, I certainly have room to back the fans up about 2/3" and shroud them with a bit of a box. What do you folks think? Would that be worthwhile, or does the hub blocking half the area of the fan not really make that much difference?
Oh, BTW, I did verify that when very hot, the louvers are fully open, and the fans are getting full battery voltage.
Thanks,
Paul
#2
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watter Wetter is decent. Royal Purple coolant additive works great. I had trouble getting my engine to ever warm up last fall. It kind of worried me. Overkill on my stock motor, maybe just what yours needs.
#3
My S/C car runs hot as well, I have a single 12" puller and a 16" pusher on my setup, wired to an adjustable thermo probe in the radiator. If you look in the Summit or Jegs online catalog you will see not all fans are equal. For example 16" pushers can vary from 2000 to 3600 cfm. My plan is to put the maximum CFM pusher/puller I can fit and that should do it.
#4
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Hi Ted,
Yes, I know about different flow rates of fans, but I haven't been able to find anything useful about shrouding electric fans or how far away from the surface they should be mounted. The factory clearly didn't put the electric fans right up against the radiator without a shroud, so I'm not convinced it's the correct approach for generic fans either.
Cheers,
Paul
Yes, I know about different flow rates of fans, but I haven't been able to find anything useful about shrouding electric fans or how far away from the surface they should be mounted. The factory clearly didn't put the electric fans right up against the radiator without a shroud, so I'm not convinced it's the correct approach for generic fans either.
Cheers,
Paul
#5
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington "Dc"
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMHO (and experience) you need a shroud when using a puller fan. Have you tried a 2 speed taurus fan. Search the forums someone used one and did a nice write-up on them. The Taurus fans are pretty nice flown +3000 cfm in high speed mode. I would suggest looking into those. (the SHO fans).
#6
Race Car
For a pusher fan, no shroud is usually used. A pusher fan is usually mounted as close to the heat exchanger as possible, preferrably with no air gap inbetween.
For a puller fan, a shroud is preferrable. It will greatly reduce the inefficiency of having a fan cage right up against the heat exchanger. Also, it can be smaller in dimensions but be able to pull air from a larger surface area with a well designed shroud.
Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
For a puller fan, a shroud is preferrable. It will greatly reduce the inefficiency of having a fan cage right up against the heat exchanger. Also, it can be smaller in dimensions but be able to pull air from a larger surface area with a well designed shroud.
Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
#7
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
WWMD?
EDIT: If you can do the Murf install, the flapectomy is comparatively not a big deal. If you get the suggestion that you need more/bigger fans and you HAVE to do the flapectomy, here's a thread on when I did it to my GT. It's a 2-3 hour project, max, as long as you have the car up in the air.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-question.html
EDIT: If you can do the Murf install, the flapectomy is comparatively not a big deal. If you get the suggestion that you need more/bigger fans and you HAVE to do the flapectomy, here's a thread on when I did it to my GT. It's a 2-3 hour project, max, as long as you have the car up in the air.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-question.html
Trending Topics
#8
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
IMHO (and experience) you need a shroud when using a puller fan. Have you tried a 2 speed taurus fan. Search the forums someone used one and did a nice write-up on them. The Taurus fans are pretty nice flown +3000 cfm in high speed mode. I would suggest looking into those. (the SHO fans).
Same size but more efficient fans might be the only solution, but what did Murf had to say about this issue?
#9
Race Car
I am in the same boat in Florida I have tried various fans and it still runs hot.
With the S/C intake blocking a large portion the radiator I am not sure what can be done.
It is fine except in traffic with the air on this seems to be a common theme with us hot climate guys.
With the S/C intake blocking a large portion the radiator I am not sure what can be done.
It is fine except in traffic with the air on this seems to be a common theme with us hot climate guys.
#10
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Can you expand a bit on the "why" here? I can see not being too concerned about the dead zone when you have a 16" pusher, with a 4" hub, where the blades are going to cover 15 times more area than the hub blocks, but in my setup, the blades maybe cover 4 times the area that the hub blocks (looks like even less from the pictures).
#11
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I have not asked him about shrouding the puller fans.
#12
Drifting
I'm in the same boat. Running hot with 4 pullers and 1 pusher. I haven't switched to the 3000 cfm yet, but have used water wetter. Runs warm under normal driving and hot under anything spirited even when it's not hot out. I'm most concerned about the air box up against the radiator because it blocks part of the radiator plus I’m guessing it adds heat to the charge.
#13
What I was told is if you are mounting pullers without a shroud you mount them as close to the rad as possible. With the shroud space them back to allow them to pull air through the larger surface area.
I could see you having heat issues with just the 4 small pullers and no pusher. You may have to add one.
I could see you having heat issues with just the 4 small pullers and no pusher. You may have to add one.
#15
Drifting
Both Brian and Davids have had failure with after market radiators.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-2-cooler.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...stage-iii.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...adiator-3.html
I bought Davids old C&R with the hopes of figuring out a way to modify it with a little 'forward tilt'.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...-2-cooler.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...stage-iii.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...adiator-3.html
I bought Davids old C&R with the hopes of figuring out a way to modify it with a little 'forward tilt'.