Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rod bearing Q? Should we replace?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2011, 05:45 PM
  #16  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
Greg, by "measure" I assume you mean measure the bearing-shell thickness with a ball-micrometer and compare new to old??

Thanks for posting, great info!
Yes. I don't use a true "ball" end micrometer, but use one that has a ball on one side and a flat on the other. And all bearings have eccentricity (sp?), as they move from the center of the bearing towards the "split". Racing bearings have more eccentricity than street bearings. This is designed this way, since the rods "pinch" at the parting lines as the loads go up. When comparing bearings, you need to measure at the very middle of the bearing, in the same place on each bearing.

Plastigage is sold to rookies that don't have measuring tools...
Old 04-16-2011, 05:49 PM
  #17  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
.....Plastigage is sold to rookies that don't have measuring tools...
How accurate are they compared to a mirometer?
Old 04-16-2011, 07:21 PM
  #18  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
How accurate are they compared to a mirometer?
Not very from what I had seen.
Old 04-16-2011, 08:14 PM
  #19  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,142
Received 343 Likes on 189 Posts
Default

I would like to thank everyone for the quick responses this morning, including AO and Dennis for lending a technical eye.

I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?

I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.

Thank you,

Dave K.
Attached Images   
Old 04-16-2011, 09:15 PM
  #20  
soupcan
Drifting
 
soupcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,204
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...lem-found.html

I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
Old 04-16-2011, 10:47 PM
  #21  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

If standard was in it, and the crank is not being re ground, then the replacement will have to be standard size too. Standard out, standard in.
Old 04-17-2011, 12:12 AM
  #22  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davek9
I would like to thank everyone for the quick responses this morning, including AO and Dennis for lending a technical eye.

I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?

I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.

Thank you,

Dave K.
Yes. No.

Certainly your crank will look like new. And the inside of the connecting rod will look the same.

So, you will definately be using "standard" rod bearings.

"Standard" is the problem. There is a pretty big variance in "standard" rod bearings. Porsche puts three different sizes of "standard" in their boxes of bearings. Glyco replacement bearings can very all over the map. You can get "standard" rod bearings that are so tight on the crank that it will cause damage/engine failure....many have been "down this path". You will need to measure your original bearings and replace them with bearings that are the same size. Beg, borrow, buy, steal a micrometer that is made to measure bearings. Hire someone who knows how to use it. Measure things very carefully. Put the bearings with the biggest clearance (they will measure the thinest) into the #2 and #6 position.
Old 04-17-2011, 12:25 AM
  #23  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,543
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

This reminds me, years ago when local guys Jim and Todd were building a 928 motor for track use. I cannot remember how many sets of Porsche bearings they ordered, but it was a lot. All measured, catagorized and the best combination picked for the motor. The rest are probalby on a shelf somewhere.
Old 04-17-2011, 12:49 AM
  #24  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
This reminds me, years ago when local guys Jim and Todd were building a 928 motor for track use. I cannot remember how many sets of Porsche bearings they ordered, but it was a lot. All measured, catagorized and the best combination picked for the motor. The rest are probalby on a shelf somewhere.
Yes. I've done this, too. It gets down to the point where you start wishing for a slightly "worn" crankshaft, so you can use the "tighter" bearings.

The problem with 928 crankshafts is that they are seldom worn. Pretty good piece of steel.
Old 04-17-2011, 01:03 AM
  #25  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Yes. I've done this, too. It gets down to the point where you start wishing for a slightly "worn" crankshaft, so you can use the "tighter" bearings.

The problem with 928 crankshafts is that they are seldom worn. Pretty good piece of steel.
What do you consider a good clearance for all the rod bearings in inches for us folks that do not know that .1mm = .004 thousandth?

Old 04-17-2011, 01:06 AM
  #26  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,543
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Come to think of it, eight of those "on the shelf" are probalby in my motor, I wasn't picky at that point
Old 04-17-2011, 01:10 AM
  #27  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
Not very from what I had seen.
Your plastigauge had gotten hot or damaged, done right, with good plastigauge it is dead on most times with really good mikes.
Old 04-17-2011, 01:13 AM
  #28  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soupcan
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...lem-found.html

I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
with used rod bearings there is a lot of "feel" to it that is much more than just clearance IMHO.
Old 04-17-2011, 03:43 AM
  #29  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

I like Plastigage as another confirmation that there's no contamination, no crud behind a bearing, and that I can sometimes do the math correctly to get the right clearances. Divide by two, carry the six, multily by the square root of three, then by .667, add in the time of day and air temperature, should be about right. Oh yeah, ALWAYS subtract the crank pin diameter. You can probably see why I need the backup.

Had a customer bring me an engine way back when, one he was building himself to save money. Still in the stand, it was locked up tight. When did it lock up? What was the last thing you did before you couldn't turn it? He didn't know. He'd just started bolting things together until he was out of pieces to bolt on. Then it wouldn't turn. Clueless... I'll speculate that Greg assembles each engine no less than three times if you count all the measure/fit/test/rotate/measure/test/assemble/test steps for each moving part. Ever wonder why some seem to be 'better' than the one you buy from Bernie's Wholesale Discount Barely Used or Reconditioned Shortblock Mart?
Old 04-17-2011, 09:47 AM
  #30  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,142
Received 343 Likes on 189 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Yes. No.

Certainly your crank will look like new. And the inside of the connecting rod will look the same.

So, you will definately be using "standard" rod bearings.

"Standard" is the problem. There is a pretty big variance in "standard" rod bearings. Porsche puts three different sizes of "standard" in their boxes of bearings. Glyco replacement bearings can very all over the map. You can get "standard" rod bearings that are so tight on the crank that it will cause damage/engine failure....many have been "down this path". You will need to measure your original bearings and replace them with bearings that are the same size. Beg, borrow, buy, steal a micrometer that is made to measure bearings. Hire someone who knows how to use it. Measure things very carefully. Put the bearings with the biggest clearance (they will measure the thinest) into the #2 and #6 position.
Thank you Greg and all, now I understand that "standard" are not all the same size and the need to measure and fit.

Edit: so now the real question is: How many sets of "standard" bearings do I need to order ?



Dave K

Last edited by davek9; 04-17-2011 at 10:19 AM. Reason: updated question


Quick Reply: Rod bearing Q? Should we replace?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:36 PM.