Rod bearing Q? Should we replace?
#16
Former Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Plastigage is sold to rookies that don't have measuring tools...
#17
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
#18
#19
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would like to thank everyone for the quick responses this morning, including AO and Dennis for lending a technical eye.
I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?
I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.
Thank you,
Dave K.
I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?
I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.
Thank you,
Dave K.
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...lem-found.html
I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
#21
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If standard was in it, and the crank is not being re ground, then the replacement will have to be standard size too. Standard out, standard in.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#22
Former Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would like to thank everyone for the quick responses this morning, including AO and Dennis for lending a technical eye.
I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?
I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.
Thank you,
Dave K.
I’d like to through out a question to the group.
Given that the bearings are designed to wear and not the crank, if the crank is undamaged and a “standard” size bearing is removed, would it not be logical that the replacement bearing would be another “standard” size?
I noticed that these bearings are marked “Standard”.
Thank you,
Dave K.
Certainly your crank will look like new. And the inside of the connecting rod will look the same.
So, you will definately be using "standard" rod bearings.
"Standard" is the problem. There is a pretty big variance in "standard" rod bearings. Porsche puts three different sizes of "standard" in their boxes of bearings. Glyco replacement bearings can very all over the map. You can get "standard" rod bearings that are so tight on the crank that it will cause damage/engine failure....many have been "down this path". You will need to measure your original bearings and replace them with bearings that are the same size. Beg, borrow, buy, steal a micrometer that is made to measure bearings. Hire someone who knows how to use it. Measure things very carefully. Put the bearings with the biggest clearance (they will measure the thinest) into the #2 and #6 position.
#23
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This reminds me, years ago when local guys Jim and Todd were building a 928 motor for track use. I cannot remember how many sets of Porsche bearings they ordered, but it was a lot. All measured, catagorized and the best combination picked for the motor. The rest are probalby on a shelf somewhere.
#24
Former Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This reminds me, years ago when local guys Jim and Todd were building a 928 motor for track use. I cannot remember how many sets of Porsche bearings they ordered, but it was a lot. All measured, catagorized and the best combination picked for the motor. The rest are probalby on a shelf somewhere.
The problem with 928 crankshafts is that they are seldom worn. Pretty good piece of steel.
#26
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Come to think of it, eight of those "on the shelf" are probalby in my motor, I wasn't picky at that point
![Stick Out Tongue](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#28
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...lem-found.html
I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
I had bought a couple sets of gyco bearings years ago, thankfully I had them for this engine. Found 5 out of the 16 sets were to tight, the original bearings were in great shape and right in the middle of spec.
#29
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I like Plastigage as another confirmation that there's no contamination, no crud behind a bearing, and that I can sometimes do the math correctly to get the right clearances. Divide by two, carry the six, multily by the square root of three, then by .667, add in the time of day and air temperature, should be about right. Oh yeah, ALWAYS subtract the crank pin diameter. You can probably see why I need the backup.
Had a customer bring me an engine way back when, one he was building himself to save money. Still in the stand, it was locked up tight. When did it lock up? What was the last thing you did before you couldn't turn it? He didn't know. He'd just started bolting things together until he was out of pieces to bolt on. Then it wouldn't turn. Clueless... I'll speculate that Greg assembles each engine no less than three times if you count all the measure/fit/test/rotate/measure/test/assemble/test steps for each moving part. Ever wonder why some seem to be 'better' than the one you buy from Bernie's Wholesale Discount Barely Used or Reconditioned Shortblock Mart?
Had a customer bring me an engine way back when, one he was building himself to save money. Still in the stand, it was locked up tight. When did it lock up? What was the last thing you did before you couldn't turn it? He didn't know. He'd just started bolting things together until he was out of pieces to bolt on. Then it wouldn't turn. Clueless... I'll speculate that Greg assembles each engine no less than three times if you count all the measure/fit/test/rotate/measure/test/assemble/test steps for each moving part. Ever wonder why some seem to be 'better' than the one you buy from Bernie's Wholesale Discount Barely Used or Reconditioned Shortblock Mart?
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes. No.
Certainly your crank will look like new. And the inside of the connecting rod will look the same.
So, you will definately be using "standard" rod bearings.
"Standard" is the problem. There is a pretty big variance in "standard" rod bearings. Porsche puts three different sizes of "standard" in their boxes of bearings. Glyco replacement bearings can very all over the map. You can get "standard" rod bearings that are so tight on the crank that it will cause damage/engine failure....many have been "down this path". You will need to measure your original bearings and replace them with bearings that are the same size. Beg, borrow, buy, steal a micrometer that is made to measure bearings. Hire someone who knows how to use it. Measure things very carefully. Put the bearings with the biggest clearance (they will measure the thinest) into the #2 and #6 position.
Certainly your crank will look like new. And the inside of the connecting rod will look the same.
So, you will definately be using "standard" rod bearings.
"Standard" is the problem. There is a pretty big variance in "standard" rod bearings. Porsche puts three different sizes of "standard" in their boxes of bearings. Glyco replacement bearings can very all over the map. You can get "standard" rod bearings that are so tight on the crank that it will cause damage/engine failure....many have been "down this path". You will need to measure your original bearings and replace them with bearings that are the same size. Beg, borrow, buy, steal a micrometer that is made to measure bearings. Hire someone who knows how to use it. Measure things very carefully. Put the bearings with the biggest clearance (they will measure the thinest) into the #2 and #6 position.
Edit: so now the real question is: How many sets of "standard" bearings do I need to order ?
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Dave K
Last edited by davek9; 04-17-2011 at 10:19 AM. Reason: updated question