Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Performance??????????s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2010, 05:50 PM
  #1  
ChristianR
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ChristianR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Memphis/Chicago
Posts: 1,611
Received 140 Likes on 71 Posts
Default Performance??????????s

hello all, i have a few questions, i owned a couple 928's in the past, they were manuals and i always liked them, i am ready for another 928, a few questions

1) how much to do a SC kit that these cars will see mid 400+ to the wheels safely

2) how does the auto compare to the manny, i had a couple mannys and i liked them, i have never driven a 928 auto

3) any year that is best for the SC install, I am not at all against an older 928 since the older they are the lighter they are, I like more nimble than heavy cars

any advice would be aprreciaciated, my biggest concern is getting an auto and disliking it. i have a '08 997TT tip as well as a '06 CTT tip and I love them, these are the only 2 autos from Porsche that I have driven that I enjoy. I have owned 15 or so 911tt's, 930's, 928's and they have all been a manny
Old 11-28-2010, 05:54 PM
  #2  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChristianR
hello all, i have a few questions, i owned a couple 928's in the past, they were manuals and i always liked them, i am ready for another 928, a few questions

1) how much to do a SC kit that these cars will see mid 400+ to the wheels safely

2) how does the auto compare to the manny, i had a couple mannys and i liked them, i have never driven a 928 auto

3) any year that is best for the SC install, I am not at all against an older 928 since the older they are the lighter they are, I like more nimble than heavy cars

any advice would be aprreciaciated, my biggest concern is getting an auto and disliking it. i have a '08 997TT tip as well as a '06 CTT tip and I love them, these are the only 2 autos from Porsche that I have driven that I enjoy. I have owned 15 or so 911tt's, 930's, 928's and they have all been a manny
Those few words just pretty much made this thread go ten pages or get locked.

I think the early 87 are the best stock block, the squirter motor.

The best block as a starting point is a early "Thick block" motor from like a 85.

Every one is going to have thoughts on this, just like which is better, a twin screw, or what ever.
Old 11-28-2010, 06:03 PM
  #3  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChristianR
hello all, i have a few questions, i owned a couple 928's in the past, they were manuals and i always liked them, i am ready for another 928, a few questions

1) how much to do a SC kit that these cars will see mid 400+ to the wheels safely

2) how does the auto compare to the manny, i had a couple mannys and i liked them, i have never driven a 928 auto

3) any year that is best for the SC install, I am not at all against an older 928 since the older they are the lighter they are, I like more nimble than heavy cars

any advice would be aprreciaciated, my biggest concern is getting an auto and disliking it. i have a '08 997TT tip as well as a '06 CTT tip and I love them, these are the only 2 autos from Porsche that I have driven that I enjoy. I have owned 15 or so 911tt's, 930's, 928's and they have all been a manny
A couple ???....since it appears to be a street car..do you have any smog laws to contend with locally?

to get mid 400's there are about 4 options for an S4

1: Murphys Stage III kit..up to 500whp or so pretty easy
2: 928 GT twin screw kit makes about 450whp
3: John Kuhn twin turbo..well over 500whp
3: Stroker...Doc Brown...his 6.4L engines are pricey, but proven..the fastest race 928's both run his engines
Old 11-28-2010, 06:07 PM
  #4  
ChristianR
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ChristianR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Memphis/Chicago
Posts: 1,611
Received 140 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

what type of money for the SC Stg 3 and the TT kits, I am defiantely more into a TT if it is done right and reliable

Thanks
Old 11-28-2010, 06:12 PM
  #5  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 361 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

15 K to bring home an automatic or manual S4 worthy of the cause.

8K for others to do the maintenance backlogged, including new gen water pump.

10K for the boost kit and all ancilliary installation, dyno, tweaking.

33K.
Old 11-28-2010, 06:14 PM
  #6  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChristianR
what type of money for the SC Stg 3 and the TT kits, I am defiantely more into a TT if it is done right and reliable

Thanks
HP isn't cheap......the SC is the "least" expensive at around $7k for the kit (not sure exactly)......the TT is more...listed at $11.5k....stroker is far beyond that.....

www.928gt.com
http://www.kuhnperformance.com/
http://www.murf928.com/
http://www.precisionmtrwerks.com/
Old 11-28-2010, 06:39 PM
  #7  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 361 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Good links.

Christian R., all the heavy lifting is done if you want to embark down this enlightened path.

Time for you to read.
Old 11-28-2010, 07:28 PM
  #8  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChristianR
hello all, i have a few questions, i owned a couple 928's in the past, they were manuals and i always liked them, i am ready for another 928, a few questions

1) how much to do a SC kit that these cars will see mid 400+ to the wheels safely

2) how does the auto compare to the manny, i had a couple mannys and i liked them, i have never driven a 928 auto

3) any year that is best for the SC install, I am not at all against an older 928 since the older they are the lighter they are, I like more nimble than heavy cars
$5k to $10k depending on the boost and how you do it. 5 to 7 psi of boost with conservative spark can be done with sharktuning a factory system, and starting with an 85/86 that might do the trick, for minimum cost.

Having owned both an AT and 5 spd, I have no interest in another AT, with the exception that a big bump in power might make the AT a more tractable practical option and still be fun. Stock I think the AT is boring.

As soon as you get past about 7 psi of boost I think the knock detection of the S4 becomes essential, otherwise an 85/86 would be fine.

Its not a continuous older gets lighter, its around 200 lbs gained in 87+, and the rest of year to year differences are pretty much related to options like seats and sun roof.
Old 11-28-2010, 07:34 PM
  #9  
linderpat
Rennlist Member
 
linderpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 14,473
Received 2,383 Likes on 1,292 Posts
Default

I'd go turbo if money isn't the issue. Kuhn's set up is very clean too, and he has been driving his for a few years now with no issues I've heard of.
Old 11-28-2010, 08:13 PM
  #10  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

How much boost will a 10/1 engine take before it knocks.

Which years have what for comp.
Old 11-28-2010, 08:16 PM
  #11  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 361 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

More boost than you can hook up on Alberta pavement, BWMAC.
Old 11-28-2010, 08:18 PM
  #12  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bwmac
How much boost will a 10/1 engine take before it knocks.

Which years have what for comp.
they really aren't 10-1.....when you factor in cam timing and measure it, its lower...& keep in mind the highest pressures (most likely to knock) are at the torque peak which is around 3000rpm... Modern turbo engines are typically 9.5 CR and higher....& that is on street gas...talk race gas and its really up there the pressures you can run safely....

Look at how Tuomo runs his....the boost increases with RPM to offset the restricted breathing (dropping VE) at higher RPM.....which is why he gets such a monster dyno #
Old 11-28-2010, 08:21 PM
  #13  
blitz928
Race Car
 
blitz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've got a car for sale that may be a good start.
Old 11-28-2010, 11:36 PM
  #14  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

If you are looking for mid-400's with boost without working the motor too hard, I think you are going to need at least a 5L motor. (M.Y.'85-'95)
The following may be more conducive to forced induction:
'87 and later have knock sensors.
Early '87 has oil squirters that spray the piston skirts.
'89 and later have heads with thicker castings around the head bolts.

If you are going to go through the expense of boosting a car, you should make sure that you can live with an A/T before committing that kind of money to it. I'm a big fan of the A/T, but there are definitely those out there that simply won't ever be happy with it. Something about not giving them the same thrill as they're out picking up their viagra prescriptions.
Old 11-29-2010, 09:47 AM
  #15  
RCinXS
Racer
 
RCinXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll probably be accused of making broad statements, once again. But I will pass on the following.

The principal requirement to produce power in the internal combustion engine is a precise mixture of clean air and fuel. An engine's horsepower and torque output is directly proportional to the rate at which this mixture enters the combustion chamber. In other words, the density (or weight ) of the charge produces power, regardless of pressure, an engine responds to density.

Therefore the more mixture that can be crammed into the cylinders, the greater the potential horsepower output will be.

A normally aspirated engine relies on atmospheric pressure (at sea level = 14.7 psi. [pounds per square inch] or 1 bar) to push the inlet charge into the negative pressure (vacuum) area within the cylinders. Boost is the amount of additional pressure created by the supercharger. So if the supercharger makes 6 psi boost, the inlet charge is atmospheric pressure plus 6 psi for a total of 20.7psi.

An engine must have the ideal air / fuel ratio to produce maximum power.
Again every engine is different, but generally the best power is produced at around 12 - 12.5 : 1. Additional fuel does not usually control detonation nor produce more power. One of the best methods of controlling detonation is octane.

Nuff Said, For Now.


Quick Reply: Performance??????????s



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:12 PM.