Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 vs. 350Z - what to do with $15,000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2010, 04:29 PM
  #196  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,601
Received 2,223 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Old enough to still have fun with the car
My 67 year old father wears this shirt:

http://www.thewirelesscatalog.com/wi...s_AG8831G.html
Old 10-29-2010, 04:39 PM
  #197  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,144
Received 256 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Exclusivity still doesn't magically make a car "non-production".

A lot of that is marketing BS anyway to help prevent car scalpers that shot the price of the F40 over $1 million in the blink of an eye.

The owners of the Ferrari dealerships qualify as one of the exclusive buyers. Guess where the car ends up? Yup, on their showroom with a window sticker, ready for the first person with the right size checkbook to walk through the door.

This all reminds me of the BS tales of a 4-5 year waiting list to get a new Countach. Is that way a dealership in Kansas City had two brand new Countach's on the lot?
Harley Davidson tries this all the time, claiming you have to wait over a year to order a bike. Yea, ok......

Yes there are cars like the FXX that have a more exclusive buyers list, as they should.



Yes it is. Along with the 911-GT1 and Mercedes CLK-GTR


Originally Posted by dprantl
Yeah, to tell you the truth I don't know if those exclusive buying claims were true of false. The only way to know would be to have enough money to be able to afford one and to try to buy

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft


Well I do from years of reading Fchat where guys have been pissed that they could not get a limited edition w/o prior ownership of many top ferraris and started threads about it and until the economic downturn it was tough to get in line to purchase a new production model if you had not bought a used model first. That has changed with the collapse of the economy.

I also know it from talking with the people who buy these things. The racer/collector whose stradale I drove, the guy I know who owns an F1 and every other top exotic, and the guy who owned what is in this pic plus a Ford GT, F40, ....... that is me in the sweatshirt leaning on something (maybe an F40).

Everyone knows what a "production car" is and buying one doesn't involve previous purchases or references and they aren't limited other then by time in the calendar or physical capacity and they recur.

Last edited by tv; 03-01-2011 at 03:12 PM.
Old 10-29-2010, 04:51 PM
  #198  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Than my buddy must be lying when he said all he has is an aftermarket intake and exhaust. That car pulled like it had much more under there from me. I don't know if the excuse 'because it's automatic' flies with me anymore.
There is a day and night difference between a manual and an auto 928. I had no problem pulling on a G35, before the SC went in. The 350Z/G35 is not as fast as they claim.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:00 PM
  #199  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EspritS4s
Is this true? I've never heard the automatic qualifier before. Also, i thought the Holbert car had a manual transmission?
Thats how I remember the auto car advertised as the fastest production automatic car back in 87.
Fastest not as in 0-60 but as in top speed.
If anyone knows of a faster production automatic trans car back then would like to see the numbers and what it is.
They do use the auto car in the commercial,not sure what they used when they ran it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgqxAd4aCVE
and the test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDllUaxNZoY

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 10-29-2010 at 05:24 PM.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:10 PM
  #200  
john bono
Rennlist Member
 
john bono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl

A guy that lived in my neighborhood had a brand new 2007 350Z coupe. All 350Z's in '07 had the same 306hp engine. We tried a bunch of times, I was always able to pull on him with my stock '86 5-speed. You have to remember that 32-valve 928's usually put down more power than they were rated for. A healthy early 32-valve puts down ~260rwhp and a good S4 puts down ~275rwhp on a dynojet. Stock Nismos put down around 250 - 260rwhp dynojet.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
This is a WAG on my part, but I bet part of that differential is the torque tube. Since it only has to deal with 300lbft of torque coming directly from the motor rather than the 1000 lb-ft that comes from the transmission in the Z, it can be narrower, and lighter, so less drivetrain loss.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:12 PM
  #201  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,601
Received 2,223 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tv
Well I do from years of reading Fchat where guys have been pissed that they could not get a limited edition w/o prior ownership of many top ferraris and started threads about it and until the economic downturn it was tough to get in line to purchase a new production model if you had not bought a used model first. That has changed with the collapse of the economy.

I also know it from talking with the people who buy these things. The racer/collector whose stradale I drove, the guy I know who owns an F1 and every other top exotic, and the guy who owned what is in this pic plus a Ford GT, F40, ....... that is me in the sweatshirt leaning on something (maybe an F40).
WOW - you know people who were turned down from buying a car.

Still doesn't prove or change anything for this discussion.

I know a guy who was turned down from buying an Bugatti EB110 and another friend who missed his window to buy a new Ford GT.

Nice photo, if I show a pic of me sitting in a vintage 917 does that give me more clout?

Originally Posted by tv
Everyone knows what a "production car" is
You obviously do not.


Exclusivity does not equal "non production" - period.
Nothing you've stated has even remotely proved this to be wrong.


My God, this is worse than discussing gear ratios with Kibort.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:16 PM
  #202  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 119 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
There is a day and night difference between a manual and an auto 928. I had no problem pulling on a G35, before the SC went in. The 350Z/G35 is not as fast as they claim.

The only 928 manual I have driven and ridden in was my Dad's 1985 and Mako928's car respectively. I can tell you that both cars felt faster than my '87 slushbox.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:39 PM
  #203  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,144
Received 256 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black944er
http://books.google.com/books?id=tdg...page&q&f=false

page 112-117 +170 and following

and this was the 4,5L Version. The S would have destroyed it. The Countach is not as fast as it looks and getting out performance kills the driver
Great old piece, thanks for posting, I had never seen that.


Hacker give it up, a honda civic is a production car an Enzo is not. The pic is nice and is on topic showing 3 NON-production cars owned by 1 man who has had many offers for each car from people who were not not lucky enough to be chosen by the factory to buy them when they were new.

Maybe that's why the mags never included them in the tests.

If we were talking about the 917 and its build quality pics of you inside one would matter and as to the old bugatti, it's hard to imagine someone being refused one when they went out of business from lack of sales;

Hard times hit the company in 1995 and, as result of chairman Artioli's over ambitious purchase of Lotus in addition to the company's quest to develop the EB112 four door car, the company was bankrupt. Dauer Racing GmbH of Nuremberg, Germany, bought the semi-finished EB 110 cars in the assembly plant plus the parts inventory through the bankruptcy trustee. The remaining chassis and a version of the engine were later developed by B Engineering into their Edonis sports car.



Production car:


encarta-car manufactured on production line: a car of a type manufactured in large numbers on a production line for general use


I would add that it is a recurring model that has no pre-set number to be produced and is available to anyone with the financial means to buy it. Anything that requires qualifications for purchase or an arbitrary limited number set in advance by the producer is not a production car.

Last edited by tv; 10-29-2010 at 06:14 PM.
Old 10-29-2010, 05:51 PM
  #204  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is one brief shot in the second video where they show Holbert's hand on the shifter which is all the way forward. It looks like a manual. BTW, it's always fun to watch that video and see how the side mirrors appear and disappear on the car

I think that you are correct that it was the fastest automatic at the time, but I also recall that they marketed it as the fastest production car period. I don't know how they explained away the other examples that have been raised.


Originally Posted by M928
Thats how I remember the auto car advertised as the fastest production automatic car back in 87.
Fastest not as in 0-60 but as in top speed.
If anyone knows of a faster production automatic trans car back then would like to see the numbers and what it is.
They do use the auto car in the commercial,not sure what they used when they ran it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgqxAd4aCVE
and the test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDllUaxNZoY
Old 10-29-2010, 06:24 PM
  #205  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,601
Received 2,223 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tv
Hacker give it up
Nothing to "give up" other than the fact that you are 100% wrong.

Originally Posted by tv
a honda civic is a production car an Enzo is not
Again by your definition, nothing more.

Originally Posted by tv
The pic is nice and is on topic showing 3 NON-production cars owned by 1 man who has had many offers for each car from people who were not not lucky enough to be chosen by the factory to buy them when they were new.
So? That doesn't change anything other than the fact that those are production cars. How / why he bought or acquired them doesn't mean a thing.

For the 4th time - exclusivity doesn't mean non-production. You saying it over and over doesn't make it so.

Originally Posted by tv
Maybe that's why the mags never included them in the tests.
Guess we don't read the same magzines.

In fact, Top Gear removed the FXX from their leader board for not being a production car. The Zonda, Enzo, GT etc... are still up there..... I wonder why?? Becasue they are production cars.

In fact, the Zonda is considered the fastest production car at the Nürburgring right now.

Originally Posted by tv
Production car:

encarta-car manufactured on production line: a car of a type manufactured in large numbers on a production line for general use
Define "large numbers".......that's what I thought.

There is a McLaren F1 owner in Texas who is well known for using it as a daily driver. So much in fact his issues with over heating in rush hour traffic are well documented. So that covers the "general use" quota.

Originally Posted by tv
I would add that it is a recurring model that has no pre-set number to be produced and is available to anyone with the financial means to buy it. Anything that requires qualifications for purchase or an arbitrary limited number set in advance by the producer is not a production car.
More BS definitions made up by you.....nothing more.
Old 10-29-2010, 06:41 PM
  #206  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EspritS4s
There is one brief shot in the second video where they show Holbert's hand on the shifter which is all the way forward. It looks like a manual. BTW, it's always fun to watch that video and see how the side mirrors appear and disappear on the car

I think that you are correct that it was the fastest automatic at the time, but I also recall that they marketed it as the fastest production car period. I don't know how they explained away the other examples that have been raised.
The way his hand is on the shifter in the 2nd video does look like a manual.
Articles on the 87 S4 as fastest production car recorded worldwide.
Also 1984 S as the fastest US car.
http://www.cars-directory.net/history/porsche/928/
Old 10-29-2010, 08:59 PM
  #207  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think there are very few of us that will ever know just how fast our cars can go.
So really what does it matter which one is a few MPH faster?
Old 10-29-2010, 10:42 PM
  #208  
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
pcar928fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

^^^^^
I bet there is a greater percentage here (and on most other car forums) who know or will know the answer to that question than in the general populace! LOL! I figured it out on my Spitfire...of course I was still barely speeding! LOL! Talk about scary though! OMG! Pretty sure I have never got quite there in any of the 928's though...
Old 10-30-2010, 12:32 AM
  #209  
87 944 C
Drifting
 
87 944 C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northwest NJ
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

simple meaning of production car: met all laws to be sold for street use, whether there were 2 made or 5000 or 1million

vr4 vs c5: even. c5zo6 will pull eventually. i dont like vettes....everyone has one. thats why i prefer something like the stealth, they're out there but not common.

the sick part...167 seems tame by todays "sports cars"....hell even i've gone 199.
Old 10-30-2010, 02:48 AM
  #210  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alot of plain vettes but not everyone has a vette like the new ZR1 that thing flies!Alittle slower in the 1/4 mile than the all wheel drive 911 but most likely traction problems would of liked to see a good set of sticky tires on that test.
On the race track thou it beat the 911 turbo and when it came to the mile run it ran 177mph and also a top end of 205mph!
1.07g also.At least after racing the heck out of the ZR1,it still ran great.
I like ZR1 and also the 911TT cars and was dissapointed in the final outcome on what the 911TT did after running up against the ZR1.They said the 2 turbos broke on the 911,they didn't say the cause.
The funny part is the 5:30 mark of the video when they explain the ZR1 lol
I like 911TT but it was good to see GM still has a Vette that KICKS ***.
http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadtes...deo/index.html


Quick Reply: 928 vs. 350Z - what to do with $15,000



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:45 PM.