Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New Hood Vent - Tastes Great & Less Filling

Old 06-29-2010, 09:32 AM
  #61  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vlocity
.... Where that vent is placed on the 968 is farther forward and flatter, back where the vent needs to be on the 928 there more of a high center.

Regards,

Ken
Ken,
First off, great work! Good looking and an effective mod.

It appears to me there is not much difference in pressure any where along the hood profile. There are no gross pressure drops.

Did you come across any physical limitations which pushed the vent further aft?

Old 06-29-2010, 09:33 AM
  #62  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vlocity
For future vent projects, how about using the deutsche nine 968 Turbo RS replica vent?
As far as the vent, I did look at that vent and the only thing that stopped me was the price, I believe the best deal I could find was in the $350 range. If I thought that it would drop in that might have been OK, but I don't think it will follow the countour of the hood, which means you will have to cut it apart. I didn't mind doing that with the $60 vent that I found on e-bay. Where that vent is placed on the 968 is farther forward and flatter, back where the vent needs to be on the 928 there more of a high center.
With the EUR doing it's thing, it's now $250 before shipping.

It's hard to judge the hood line curvature without actually measuring or test fitting the piece. Someone will have to try this.
Old 06-29-2010, 09:37 AM
  #63  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

i might have to do that. but right now im debating on carbon fiber with Naca vents and a vent... i have just never worked with CF before.
Attached Images   
Old 06-29-2010, 09:39 AM
  #64  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jadz928
It appears to me there is not much difference in pressure any where along the hood profile. There are no gross pressure drops. Did you come across any physical limitations which pushed the vent further aft?
The vent opening has to be rear of the radiator fan shroud to do its job properly. This means that the 968 Turbo RS intercooler air exit vent would need to be placed significantly further back on a 928 from where it is on 928 Turbo RS.

Apart from the fact that they are simply different cars with different dimensions, it's also worth remembering that on a 968 Turbo RS the vent is the exit fromt he intercooler air channel which is sealed off from the air that goes into the air intake or the radiator.
Old 06-29-2010, 09:43 AM
  #65  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Ducman82, my esthetic preference is to use body colored went in balck car and leave the carbon fiber visuals for later model year cars.
Old 06-29-2010, 09:54 AM
  #66  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

o, id paint it car color. let the hondas have exposed CF
Old 06-29-2010, 11:23 AM
  #67  
Vlocity
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Vlocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northwest, Ohio
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

HTML Code:
Ken,
First off, great work! Good looking and an effective mod.

It appears to me there is not much difference in pressure any where along the hood profile. There are no gross pressure drops.

Did you come across any physical limitations which pushed the vent further aft?
Thanks !

The main consideration for me was moving the vent back as far as practical to give the air exiting the radiator a chance to "turn". I also believe that I picked up a major benefit from the leading edge lip of the vent, which will add to the pressure reduction on the opening side.

Ken
Old 06-29-2010, 01:15 PM
  #68  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

There probably is no "major" benefit to the lip. this is because , due to the shape of the 928 front area, that area for the hood vent, is a very low pressure area, in which case there is very little flow directly over the surface of the hood there. (separated flow). ducting it from radiator would help a bit, but I think just an opening will work fine. if anyone has a sunx sensor as I do, you can take some pressure measurements at speed and see what is going on, or video some tuft movement attached in that area.

Originally Posted by Vlocity
HTML Code:
Ken,
First off, great work! Good looking and an effective mod.

It appears to me there is not much difference in pressure any where along the hood profile. There are no gross pressure drops.

Did you come across any physical limitations which pushed the vent further aft?
Thanks !

The main consideration for me was moving the vent back as far as practical to give the air exiting the radiator a chance to "turn". I also believe that I picked up a major benefit from the leading edge lip of the vent, which will add to the pressure reduction on the opening side.

Ken
Old 06-29-2010, 01:38 PM
  #69  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
There probably is no "major" benefit to the lip. this is because , due to the shape of the 928 front area, that area for the hood vent, is a very low pressure area, in which case there is very little flow directly over the surface of the hood there. (separated flow)...
Mark,
I wouldn't be too sure about that. There is plenty of flow but higher pressures.

I'd propose those measurements are at or near the surface.

If the vent "lip" disrupts laminar flow across the hood surface, it make create a pressure drop.

Plus the lip is raised off the surface which may allow the vent to utililize lower pressures, similar to how a "ram air" induction works.

How far off the hood surface is it, Ken?
Attached Images   
Old 06-29-2010, 02:15 PM
  #70  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

everybody is doing it now!

some great shots from the crew at sears this last weekend in the PRC race.

https://rennlist.com/forums/racing-a...-6-2010-a.html
Old 06-29-2010, 02:19 PM
  #71  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
everybody is doing it now!

some great shots from the crew at sears this last weekend in the PRC race.

https://rennlist.com/forums/racing-a...-6-2010-a.html
mostly 11's, no Fofo's
Old 06-29-2010, 02:20 PM
  #72  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

no, there is very low pressures in the area we are talking about. if you look at the stream test, the boundary layer is pretty substantial. (high off the hood) the stagnation points are high pressure. where we have the vent, there is still is separation based on tufts Ive run. however, you are right, at that point of the hood vent and the lower pressuer, there is substantial flow. a lip might help, but already there is a pressure differential. NACA ducts work to make something out of nothing, with no lips, but the shape.

the key thing here is to have the vent aft of the radiator, and before the middle of the front tire as a location. aft of that, you get into the higher pressure zone.

Originally Posted by Jadz928
Mark,
I wouldn't be too sure about that. There is plenty of flow but higher pressures.

I'd propose those measurements are at or near the surface.

If the vent "lip" disrupts laminar flow across the hood surface, it make create a pressure drop.

Plus the lip is raised off the surface which may allow the vent to utililize lower pressures, similar to how a "ram air" induction works.

How far off the hood surface is it, Ken?
Old 06-29-2010, 02:22 PM
  #73  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

just to give you an idea, the headlight covers i have got sucked out at 100mph until i fixed my re-inforcement, attachement set up. (area 5-6 of the flow chart)
we put the vents in the location "8".
Old 06-30-2010, 10:16 AM
  #74  
Vlocity
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Vlocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northwest, Ohio
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

HTML Code:
Mark,
I wouldn't be too sure about that. There is plenty of flow but higher pressures.

I'd propose those measurements are at or near the surface.

If the vent "lip" disrupts laminar flow across the hood surface, it make create a pressure drop.

Plus the lip is raised off the surface which may allow the vent to utililize lower pressures, similar to how a "ram air" induction works.

How far off the hood surface is it, Ken?
The lip is 1.38 inches high. I can't find one of the articles that I used as reference right now, but none of those discussions included just cutting a hole, as it wasn't considered an optimum idea. I think Louie discussed that in a previous thread.

Ken
Old 06-30-2010, 12:31 PM
  #75  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

sure, its all relative too, right. look at the flow patterns. will 1.5 " get you in the flow? maybe. if so, what does it do to drop the pressure over the hole. I can easily measure the change and do an experiment. i would say, the change will be very minimal. If you look at most all of the ALMS cars that have wind tunnel and experts helping with the design. near none of them have a lip prior to the opening. the gains in pressure drop, might be offset by increased drag which would be a product.

I already posted the vent vs the no vent pressure changes, and it was very subtle, but the tufts point up at a 45 degree angle , even at 120mph. closed, the tufts lay flat, like the pictures here. there is a lot of venting, and this all help with downforce. (and cooling when the car is sitting still . )


Originally Posted by Vlocity
HTML Code:
Mark,
I wouldn't be too sure about that. There is plenty of flow but higher pressures.

I'd propose those measurements are at or near the surface.

If the vent "lip" disrupts laminar flow across the hood surface, it make create a pressure drop.

Plus the lip is raised off the surface which may allow the vent to utililize lower pressures, similar to how a "ram air" induction works.

How far off the hood surface is it, Ken?
The lip is 1.38 inches high. I can't find one of the articles that I used as reference right now, but none of those discussions included just cutting a hole, as it wasn't considered an optimum idea. I think Louie discussed that in a previous thread.

Ken


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: New Hood Vent - Tastes Great & Less Filling



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:22 PM.