Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Possible to eliminate the suspension "settling" issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2010, 07:05 PM
  #16  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Hmmm....... learn something new every day.
Old 01-25-2010, 07:23 PM
  #17  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,537
Received 2,163 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Default

A better test would be to lower the car, and loosen the four bolts that hold the lower control arm in place

Originally Posted by Fabio421
It's just one more thing to show you that Porsche didn't think of the 928 as a performance car.
I wouldn't go that far. It's a compromise most (if not all) performance cars have. How many street cars do you know of that come from the factory with 100% solid bushings?

Even the Ferrari guys are looking for solid bushings:

http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=263591

Here is the photo from the 2nd post:

Or these "pillow ball" bushings:
http://www.rhdjapan.com/m-tecnologia...rari-355-59516
Attached Images  
Old 01-25-2010, 08:53 PM
  #18  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
A better test would be to lower the car, and loosen the four bolts that hold the lower control arm in place


I wouldn't go that far. It's a compromise most (if not all) performance cars have. How many street cars do you know of that come from the factory with 100% solid bushings?

Even the Ferrari guys are looking for solid bushings:

http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=263591

Here is the photo from the 2nd post:
Well maybe I got a little carried away w/ myself. What can I say, I was on a roll. But the old school rubber bushings are the problem.
Old 01-25-2010, 09:55 PM
  #19  
Lloyd
Rennlist Member
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The lower control arm rubber bushings do not provide any freedom of movement. They may provide great high speed dampening on the autobahn, but if you want to have a responsive track car it has to go. Remove as much rubber as you can with a drill bit then fire up a propane torch and melt the rest of it out. This is a real messy job. I machined the A-arm spindle on a Bridgeport Mill. Also made delrin bushings to fit. I have been running this car on the track with 2000 lb front springs and LEDA shocks for 4 years with no issues. I have some pictures I will try to include.
Attached Images    
Old 01-25-2010, 09:58 PM
  #20  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

It might not be the shocks,but it might be the springs. after being in full droop, the compress and might take time to "settle". I dont know, but what I can tell you and can see with my hypercoil springs, is that there is really not any setting time. its low from the moment you drop the car. Now, with scots car, using the old springs (although cut), it still sits way high until its driven a long while. (or a few laps on the race track). maybe its a function of the stock diameter springs and those purches it uses.

Originally Posted by Fabio421
I can say without a doubt that it IS NOT the shocks. I have tested both new and used shocks and they will rebound completely within a couple of seconds. Thats without the spring attached. Now imagine how fast they would rebound with a ***lb sping pushing them apart?

The problem is in the bushings. Race cars use poly bushings, metal bushing or spherical bearings. These types of rubber bushings that we have don't allow the suspension to move as freely as you would typically want in a performance car. It's just one more thing to show you that Porsche didn't think of the 928 as a performance car.
Old 01-25-2010, 10:07 PM
  #21  
chewy8000
Pro
Thread Starter
 
chewy8000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lloyd
The lower control arm rubber bushings do not provide any freedom of movement. They may provide great high speed dampening on the autobahn, but if you want to have a responsive track car it has to go. Remove as much rubber as you can with a drill bit then fire up a propane torch and melt the rest of it out. This is a real messy job. I machined the A-arm spindle on a Bridgeport Mill. Also made delrin bushings to fit. I have been running this car on the track with 2000 lb front springs and LEDA shocks for 4 years with no issues. I have some pictures I will try to include.

Lloyd!

Thats exactly what I was lookng for. Delrin part #'s, measurements or where you got them please... I have a machine shop that can do the arms no problem. I just need a place to start with the delrin. I'm going to replace the upper A-arms with Carl's tubular units eventually and I think the delrin on the bottom is the way to go.

Last edited by chewy8000; 01-25-2010 at 10:23 PM.
Old 01-25-2010, 10:18 PM
  #22  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
It might not be the shocks,but it might be the springs. after being in full droop, the compress and might take time to "settle". I dont know, but what I can tell you and can see with my hypercoil springs, is that there is really not any setting time. its low from the moment you drop the car. Now, with scots car, using the old springs (although cut), it still sits way high until its driven a long while. (or a few laps on the race track). maybe its a function of the stock diameter springs and those purches it uses.
Mark, as I mentioned before, you have a much higher spring rate, so the car is held off the ground by that considerable resistance offered by the springs. With stock springs, the amount of resistance overall is less, so the same resistance due to the bushings plays a larger part in the whole picture, relatively speaking. Also, it's possible that your setup does not allow the front suspension to droop enough to make the bushings take the new "set" that we see with stock suspension. What is the fully extended length of your front shocks, and how does that compare to an original assembly?
Old 01-25-2010, 10:28 PM
  #23  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,537
Received 2,163 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lloyd
The lower control arm rubber bushings do not provide any freedom of movement. They may provide great high speed dampening on the autobahn, but if you want to have a responsive track car it has to go. Remove as much rubber as you can with a drill bit then fire up a propane torch and melt the rest of it out. This is a real messy job. I machined the A-arm spindle on a Bridgeport Mill. Also made delrin bushings to fit. I have been running this car on the track with 2000 lb front springs and LEDA shocks for 4 years with no issues. I have some pictures I will try to include.


That is awesome!!!

I recently swapped out the OEM rubber for poly on a non-928. You are correct, grab a torch and make a huge mess....

Originally Posted by chewy8000
Thats exactly what I was lookng for. Delrin part #'s, measurements or where you got them please... I have a machine shop that can do the arms no problem. I just need a place to start with the delrin.
+1
Old 01-25-2010, 10:32 PM
  #24  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

I think you might be right there too, but it doesnt explain scots set up, with the same (near the same) spring rate up front. However, after pulling the holbert car apart in that area, i now remember how much stiction and binding the rubber bushings have. You guys are probably right. Its all in that lower control arm set up!

mk

Originally Posted by SharkSkin
Mark, as I mentioned before, you have a much higher spring rate, so the car is held off the ground by that considerable resistance offered by the springs. With stock springs, the amount of resistance overall is less, so the same resistance due to the bushings plays a larger part in the whole picture, relatively speaking. Also, it's possible that your setup does not allow the front suspension to droop enough to make the bushings take the new "set" that we see with stock suspension. What is the fully extended length of your front shocks, and how does that compare to an original assembly?
Old 01-25-2010, 11:40 PM
  #25  
Lloyd
Rennlist Member
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Chewy, Set up the A-arm on a bridgeport mill with the spindle pointing up. Use an indicator to determine that z-axis is parallel with the spindle. Using a boring bar set up to the inside "trepan" the spindle. Remove a minimum of material, but enough to clean up. Put a nice radius on the bottom to relief any stress point. Measure the diameter of the A-arm spindle and make some bushings with about .003" clearance on the hole. One of the bushings will need to be split. Also , the OD of the bushing is important so you have enough clamping, but not too much. I have drawings somewhere, you may have to email me. I actually used UMHW plastic because it is really tough stuff and it machines much better than delrin.
Attached Images  
Old 01-26-2010, 10:31 AM
  #26  
wildwestsydney
Racer
 
wildwestsydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south shore MA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lloyd
Chewy, Set up the A-arm on a bridgeport mill with the spindle pointing up. Use an indicator to determine that z-axis is parallel with the spindle. Using a boring bar set up to the inside "trepan" the spindle. Remove a minimum of material, but enough to clean up. Put a nice radius on the bottom to relief any stress point. Measure the diameter of the A-arm spindle and make some bushings with about .003" clearance on the hole. One of the bushings will need to be split. Also , the OD of the bushing is important so you have enough clamping, but not too much. I have drawings somewhere, you may have to email me. I actually used UMHW plastic because it is really tough stuff and it machines much better than delrin.

How rough is the surface after the rubber is removed? Was it machined? How is the rubber bonded to the aluminum?

Sam

Last edited by wildwestsydney; 01-26-2010 at 02:26 PM. Reason: typo
Old 01-26-2010, 02:13 PM
  #27  
chewy8000
Pro
Thread Starter
 
chewy8000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wish one of the vendors offered these. I would buy them in a heartbeat.
Old 01-26-2010, 02:56 PM
  #28  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,537
Received 2,163 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chewy8000
I wish one of the vendors offered these. I would buy them in a heartbeat.
The issue for most vendors is the modification to the control arm, so to offer a complete package would need to include some kind of exchange for arms too.

I have never seen a lower control arm with the rubber removed, so I have no idea what is all involved. I have a set of S4 lowers I was sent by mistake (when I purchased some uppers.....non vendor purchase). If I get bored this weekend I might fire up the torch to satisfy my curiosity.
Old 01-26-2010, 05:52 PM
  #29  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

The lower control arm is sort of ribbed on one of the cast shafts. I do not remember the other. I replaced mine on the S4 arms I had with a sort of blue urethane bushing. Whether it holds up, I will not know until I get the drive the car (finally!)

Erik - I did not need the torch. I simply worked and worked at it until it came off. Obviously the one with the metal outers - will be a bit more difficult.

I think machining down the shafts is a good idea - though I would not want to go too far. I assyme the inner ridge between the body and the shaft is specifically radiused for a reason.





The ones I have I don't think are made any more. I would probably replace them with delrin if they failed quickly.
Old 01-26-2010, 05:58 PM
  #30  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,537
Received 2,163 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Default

Delrin or UMHW that Lloyd used is cheap enough. I know we have a couple of places in our area that could pump them out for a reasonable cost. If we can put a rough cost on machining the lower A-Arms, this could be a reality rather quickly.

I'll be chatting with Todd soon, take a look at some lower arms with him & figure out a game plan.


Quick Reply: Possible to eliminate the suspension "settling" issue?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:38 PM.