Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Timing Belt / Tensioner Recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2010, 02:03 PM
  #46  
Stromius
Three Wheelin'
 
Stromius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This is a special tool you can get from any of our suppliers (or Porsche dealer). I forget the p/n. About $60 or if someone has one locally, you're in luck.

Cam gears you'll be looking for pitting of the coating. Any shiny metal indicates the coating is wearing and 'most' think about buying new cam, oil gear and potentially crank gear. You can also consider recoating them for $15-20 each at places like finishlinecoatings.com. All TB gears are subject to wear so careful inspection is warrented. Note the cam gear may be aluminum (original) and a steel replacement will not need the washer/spacer that is behind the aluminum one.

Good luck..great thread started by Dwayne on the process.
Old 01-03-2010, 02:10 PM
  #47  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stromius
Note the oil pump gear may be aluminum (original) and a steel replacement will not need the washer/spacer that is behind the aluminum one.
Fixed.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 01-03-2010, 03:00 PM
  #48  
rse
Advanced
 
rse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2 Newbie questions:
How does one check that the belt tension warning system is working?
What technological advances are applicable and used in the new tensioners vs 35 years ago?
Ron
Old 01-03-2010, 03:20 PM
  #49  
Earl Gillstrom
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Earl Gillstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Mills, PA
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A few comments on timing belts and tensioners:
First, I have never seen a pktensioner. The other products that Ken has developed are nothing short of FABULOUS. Especially the cam timing tool. I have done it the Porsche way and it takes many hours and is probably not as accurate as Ken's tool.
I have never seen a cam belt failure. After doing many cam belt services, I am very impressed that the original Porsche system works so good with the lack of knowledge/workmanship that I have witnessed. Some examples below:
~30% have the right cam (passenger side) 1 tooth out of time. This is easy to do if you are not careful. It is VERY obvious if you look at the timing marks. The car runs much smother and faster when in time.
~50% have NO oil in the tensioner, usually a bad gasket that looks like it has never been replaced. Sometimes a boot that is rock hard and never been replaced. And a rock hard O ring on 90%.
~30% have missing or misplaced bimetal washers in the tensioner.
Most have worn out pivot bushings.
Very loose belts with the warning system grounded to eliminate that annoying light.
I have seen belt tension at 1 on the Porsche gauge and, in time. Other cars at 7 (should be 5 to 5.3).
When checking tension, you MUST be at TDC for cylinder 1. Any other place tension is different.
Kemph Gauge: If you are working on a 32 valve, the tension has to be all the way high in the window. That gauge was made for 16 valve cars.

Dr. Bob: As it turns out, I am doing a timing belt job on my own car ('91GT). I had the tensioner on the bench, so it was easy to try your suggestion of testing how much change in temperature affects the length. From ~50f to 160f it contracted .040". I was not sure how much pressure to put on the assembly, and it was awkward to compress the tension checker spring, so I compressed it until it was grounded to do the checks. Hopefully that put enough tension on the washers to get an accurate measurement.
.040" does not seem like much, but there are too many things moving with temperature change for me to comprehend.

With the abuse that I have seen with this system, I am amazed that there are not many more timing belt failures causing valve damage.
Old 01-03-2010, 03:26 PM
  #50  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

First question answer: The TB tension warning expects a ground contact to keep the warning off. OPen the circuit and you get the warning.

Easiest check is to pull the little wire connector from the center belt cover. There's a small plug connector with an o-ring that fits a connector molded into the cover. Top corner of the center cover on the right (pass side on US cars) side of the center cover, an inch or so from where that pass side belt cover meets the center cover. You can use a screwdriver from the top, or a small pliers from the front to pull the connector. Once the connector is removed, start the car and let it run for a few minutes. Sometime around the two-minutes-of-running mark, the belt tension warning will come on.
Old 01-03-2010, 03:32 PM
  #51  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Thanks for the verification Earl. It proves that the washers do in fact compensate for temp variation in the engine. I stand down from my "I call BS" position on their function.
Old 01-03-2010, 04:01 PM
  #52  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,174
Received 412 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Actually, I did have an "ah ha" moment. This came after carefully studing the design of Porken's tensioner and then calling him and asking him what kept his tensioner from collapsing when there was a "backforce" applied to the tensioner that was larger than the spring pressure that kept the belt tight.
I told you (via email) that you would have to turn the engine CCW for a few minutes in order for the tensioner to retract, and the belt to loosen in the manner you imagine.

One cannot have a a genuine 'ah ha', without having installed the Audi parts on a PKsn'r bracket, and tried to rotate the pulley inward when cold.


Originally Posted by GregBBRD
You guys need to be really careful when you are comparing belt tensioning designs from one vehicle to another. "The 968 essentially does the same thing as Porken's tensioner" is an especially bad example.
The 968 analogy is directed at the sprung/hydraulically damped tensioner/damper, versus a solid tensioner (which the 928 tensioner is, for all intents).

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Note that the 928 design has a "smooth" wheel that tensions the belt and that the 968 design has a wheel with "teeth". This makes tooth 'slippage" much harder on the 968 design, since the belt needs to actually "jump a tooth" at the tensioner to "jump a tooth at the crankshaft". Not so, with the 928 design.
The 968 tensioner pulley rotates. (This is by design. )

Assuming a slack belt from a stock 928 tensioner on a cold engine which was shut off when hot, rotating the engine counter-clockwise will cause the crank gear to slip over the belt. The belt does not need to move.

A 'kickback' from a backfire won't occur until the engine is spun CW by the starter at least a partial revolution, by which time the belt would be tight on a dynamically tensioned system like the PKsn'r. Belt tension is higher when cold with a PKsn'r.

The need for real damping to keep the belt on the gears is greatest when the engine is cold. With a PKsn'r, you can see the tensioner working hard to dampen the uneven pulsations of cold running. There is no comparable damping of any consequence with the stock tensioner.


Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Note that the 928 belt design pushes the belt towards the center of the engine. This "direction change" makes any backwards leverage on that pulley very extreme. Note that the 968 design pushes the belt from the center of the engine towards the outside of the engine, reducing the effect of any backforce.
The Audi tensioner system used on the PKsn'r has the same belt routing as the 928. It is designed to take the heavier load and shock of a belt which is thicker and wider (1-1/4") with less stretch than the 928 belt (1"), and revs higher and faster than a 928. The components were designed for an original 90K+ mile service interval (since reduced to 60K).

No other engine that I could find has so many accessory pulleys or a tension warning system (with a 3 minute delay at startup) like the 928. All of these additions are to compensate for a poor design, which cannot increase tension when the engine is cold.

Old 01-03-2010, 04:25 PM
  #53  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,839
Received 896 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Flywheel Lock Tool is $53 from 928sRus
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 01-03-2010, 04:48 PM
  #54  
vbatla
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
vbatla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Granger, TX
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Flywheel Lock Tool is $53 from 928sRus
__________________

Thanks. What's the price for the Porken's tensioner setup?
Old 01-03-2010, 04:50 PM
  #55  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,839
Received 896 Likes on 341 Posts
Default

Send me an email at roger@928srus.com and I will send you a list of all the parts you may want to consider.
Roger
Old 01-03-2010, 05:03 PM
  #56  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
The 968 tensioner pulley rotates. (This is by design. )
I don't understand your point here...aren't all the tensioner pulleys designed to rotate?

Originally Posted by Porken
Assuming a slack belt from a stock 928 tensioner on a cold engine which was shut off when hot, rotating the engine counter-clockwise will cause the crank gear to slip over the belt. The belt does not need to move.
I've only ever seen this happen when using an aftermarket "big rubber band" timing belt. I had one of those pieces of crap tightened to 5.2 "belt units" on one of Anderson's race engines. Brand new engine...it "coughed" when starting and jumped cam timing. The belt was still at 5.2 "belt units". I have not used anything by genuine Factory belts, since that day. The price savings of using an "aftermarket" crap belt could never begin to be worth a valve job.

Look...I'm not a closed minded fool....I look at all new products and study them at length...sometimes even try them....but I'm not an idiot. I'm not going to use something that I see or experience a problem with.


Originally Posted by Porken
The need for real damping to keep the belt on the gears is greatest when the engine is cold. With a PKsn'r, you can see the tensioner working hard to dampen the uneven pulsations of cold running. There is no comparable damping of any consequence with the stock tensioner.
Wow, now you are really scaring me, not helping me more comfortable!

The stock tensioner is designed to be adjusted to 5.0-5.2 "belt units" when the belt is cold. This is really tight. The belt tension, because of the design, is supposed to stay close to this number when the engine gets warm, which it does. The "belt tension" warning light comes on at approximately 3.5-3.8 "belt units", which is still pretty darn tight.

There is no "comparable damping of any consequence" from the stock tensioner, because none is needed. The belt is tight and properly adjusted.

Now, you claim that you can see your tensioner "working hard to dampen the uneven pulsations of cold running". Well, let's think about this. Obviously, the belt is not getting longer and shorter (if it is a high quality belt). That must mean that the tensioner is responding to pressures exerted on it by the engine wanting to "kick backwards" when it is cold....that is the only variable when the engine is cold (aside from preset tension). Since the spring pressure provided by Audi tensioner is constant force and the belt can't be changing length, that means that any movement by your tensioner has to be in the "loosening direction", which is what my point has been all along. There simply is no positive stop in the "backwards direction" when the engine "kicks back".

Note your picture of the Audi engine and the location of the tensioning roller. Now look at a Porsche 928 engine. Note that the roller is dramatically closer to the crankshaft and that the belt makes a much "harder" turn around the roller on the Porsche design. This means that the force exerted on that roller, by the belt in the Porsche design is much higher on the Porsche design than on the Audi design....it's simple physics. If there is a "backwards" force applied to your tensioner, without a positive stop, it is going to compress. Your example of your tensioner moving when the engine is cold is proof of that!
Old 01-03-2010, 05:04 PM
  #57  
rse
Advanced
 
rse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks on that belt tension check system.
Old 01-03-2010, 06:04 PM
  #58  
vbatla
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
vbatla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Granger, TX
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good points for both tensioners. Should I decide to keep the stock tensioner; is there a complete rebuild kit for it, or just replace what's needed/worn?
Old 01-03-2010, 06:53 PM
  #59  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,174
Received 412 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I don't understand your point here...aren't all the tensioner pulleys designed to rotate?
Yes. IE. the belt does not need to 'slip' over the teeth on the 968 tensioner pulley, the pulley needs only rotate to supply belt to the crank gear.

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
This makes tooth 'slippage" much harder on the 968 design, since the belt needs to actually "jump a tooth" at the tensioner to "jump a tooth at the crankshaft". Not so, with the 928 design.



Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Wow, now you are really scaring me, not helping me more comfortable!

The stock tensioner is designed to be adjusted to 5.0-5.2 "belt units" when the belt is cold. This is really tight. The belt tension, because of the design, is supposed to stay close to this number when the engine gets warm, which it does. The "belt tension" warning light comes on at approximately 3.5-3.8 "belt units", which is still pretty darn tight.
Don't be scared. We can all work through this.

What's really scary is fact that with a new belt, the belt tension is loose after a few hundred miles until the next belt check, which may be as long as 1500 miles later, or the amount of tension required to keep the belt on the gears from cold to hot with the stock 'tensioner', reducing the life of the water pump, accelerating sprocket wear, etc.


Originally Posted by GregBBRD
There is no "comparable damping of any consequence" from the stock tensioner, because none is needed. The belt is tight and properly adjusted.

Now, you claim that you can see your tensioner "working hard to dampen the uneven pulsations of cold running". Well, let's think about this. Obviously, the belt is not getting longer and shorter (if it is a high quality belt). That must mean that the tensioner is responding to pressures exerted on it by the engine wanting to "kick backwards" when it is cold....that is the only variable when the engine is cold (aside from preset tension). Since the spring pressure provided by Audi tensioner is constant force and the belt can't be changing length, that means that any movement by your tensioner has to be in the "loosening direction", which is what my point has been all along. There simply is no positive stop in the "backwards direction" when the engine "kicks back".
Even a 'high quality' belt stretches momentarily. This can be seen in comparing the belt tension at different degrees in a revolution, or by comparing cam timing at TDC #1 versus at other positions, which may show up to 2° crank difference. This is due to differing valve spring opening times, requiring more force to overcome, which -s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-s- the rubber belt over it's long length.

As has been repeated many many times, the tensioner/damper units will spring out quickly, but are hydraulically stopped from compressing more than a small amount unless the pressure is maintained for more than ~30 seconds when warm, and a few minutes when cold. To fully compress the tensioner/damper in a vise takes over 5 minutes when cold.

Originally Posted by jcorenman
The other thing that is key is the hydraulic dampening. The Audi tensioner (and I assume others) have valving which allows them to take up any loose tension quickly, but they give it back only slowly. You can readily see this with Ken's tensioner-- pull the pin and it takes the slack right out, but in order to get it back you've got to lean on the wrench for a while to compress the rod again. Pretty slick, and exactly what is needed.

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
There is no "comparable damping of any consequence" from the stock tensioner, because none is needed. The belt is tight and properly adjusted.

Now, you claim that you can see your tensioner "working hard to dampen the uneven pulsations of cold running". Well, let's think about this. Obviously, the belt is not getting longer and shorter (if it is a high quality belt). That must mean that the tensioner is responding to pressures exerted on it by the engine wanting to "kick backwards" when it is cold....that is the only variable when the engine is cold (aside from preset tension). Since the spring pressure provided by Audi tensioner is constant force and the belt can't be changing length, that means that any movement by your tensioner has to be in the "loosening direction", which is what my point has been all along. There simply is no positive stop in the "backwards direction" when the engine "kicks back".
The small amount of movement allowed is to dampen momentary overtension caused by inequal torque from uneven firing events which are more prevalent when the engine is cold.

The dramatic tensioner/damper movement seen when cold is not from compression, but from taking up of slack created by stronger cylinders firing with more force than others. As the belt turns, the small amount of momentary retraction allowed by the T/D releases this section of overtension that was in the belt on the other side of the crank gear, restoring the average tension. (If it were not able to retract, the average tension would keep increasing.) Flutter/flap doesn't go away when warm, it's just reduced.

Also affecting the belt at speed is the aforementioned valve spring events. As the cam gears come onto a sequence of high spring pressure, the belt stretches and slack forms in between both banks, and at the T/D. As each gear comes off the lobes it takes up this slack quickly (resulting in the GT lobe wear). Not only does the PKsn'r give a more even average tension, it also calms the cams, for more precise timing!


The stock 928 tensioner is not capable of momentarily increasing tension to take up slack from these uneven firings or cam events, so the belt flaps, requiring 'anti-flap' pulleys to limit it's travel! (The pulleys are not true idlers, as they do not normally touch the belt.) The tension warning system has a 3 minute delay in the Central Warning System so as to not advertise the flapping which would trigger a [BELT TEN.] warning. When the oil leaks out of the stock tensioner, the loss of the slight amount of damping the oil provides often triggers belt warnings from the flapping of the belt.

With the PKsn'r there is no belt flutter/flap between the crank gear and the 1-4 cam gear. When warm, if you rev the engine up to high rpm, you can see the belt flutter between the 1-4 gear and the water pump, but the belt is always dead flat at the PKsn'r.
Old 01-03-2010, 07:23 PM
  #60  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Perhaps the most definitive way to solve this debate is to make a video of a 928 with the timing belt covers off showing the stock tensioner at different RPMs as the engine is warming up. Then compare this to a video of the PK tensioner in the same conditions. I have seen first-hand the belt flutter that occurs at certain RPM points with the stock tensioner and it made my stomach turn.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft


Quick Reply: Timing Belt / Tensioner Recommendation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:02 AM.