Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

More base circle questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2009, 04:10 PM
  #16  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
944 Turbo valve springs. Be careful about too much spring.
Greg,

Is the 944 Turbo spring the same as the 944S2 spring?

Do you have any input on what kind of seat pressures you would like to see with the bigger cams (more than stock GT lift) in a 928 for a street application?
Old 01-27-2009, 04:12 PM
  #17  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Seriously? I was thinking of using the 78/79 cams as they have good closing degrees for ramming more air in the cylinder. More lift would be cool. Is this a special deal for friends of ATB or should I can I call them?
subscribing...
Old 01-27-2009, 04:23 PM
  #18  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by largecar379
as you well know, we're not dealing with a $150 SBC cam here, that just about any cam shop can regrind......
Other than the fact that this cam has larger bearings, its almost exactly like a Chevy cam. Simple, no sprockets, etc. Would would any cam shop not be able to grind it, with, as Jim morton has been nice enough to inform, specific understanding of the ramping nunbers, etc?
Old 01-27-2009, 04:24 PM
  #19  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
Is the 944 Turbo spring the same as the 944S2 spring?
The 944 turbo spring is the dual spring for the 2V heads. Its larger than the dual spring for the 4V 944S2 heads.
Old 01-27-2009, 04:26 PM
  #20  
largecar379
Three Wheelin'
 
largecar379's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: not where you think I am
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Other than the fact that this cam has larger bearings, its almost exactly like a Chevy cam. Simple, no sprockets, etc. Would would any cam shop not be able to grind it, with, as Jim morton has been nice enough to inform, specific understanding of the ramping nunbers, etc?


I had made several calls to cam shops, and they all referred me to WebCam.






--Russ
Old 01-27-2009, 04:36 PM
  #21  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The Cam shop that Adam has graciously suggested is indeed viable. I called them today, just now.

The gentleman I spoke to seemed to be familiar with what I was asking for, and the price is as Adam suggested, as long as I can provide him information about how much "wiggle room" I actually can take up in these lifters. It was suggested that there is almost 2mm in the smaller more compact lifters in the 32V engines to add lift to the cam, and not have to change anything drastic in the lifter.

I want to find and confirm this same information for the 2V lifters. He said that as long as we know that, there should be some realistic room for improvement from grinding some base circle away and leveling this removal into the rest of the profile (just as Jim suggested).

So: Anyone know how much room we have in the lifters? I will see what Mike Ford knows since he just had some big bumpsticks made. I just want some more lift to possibly unshroud the larger valves in a euro head a bit more.
Old 01-27-2009, 09:23 PM
  #22  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
The 944 turbo spring is the dual spring for the 2V heads. Its larger than the dual spring for the 4V 944S2 heads.
Thanks for the clarification.

Glad that the call into Delta Camshaft went well. If you need someone local to to do any running around to help out with your cams, let me know.
Old 01-28-2009, 05:37 PM
  #23  
RicerSchnitzzle
Three Wheelin'
 
RicerSchnitzzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Banished to the SBC Wastelands
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Question is the benefit of just reducing the base circle with out adding weld on a 16v Euro S cam? About $700 cheaper than a weld and grind giving close to same results. Changing the base on a Euro S 1mm, lift should go from .471" lift to .512", 1.5mm would net a .531 lift. I understand a straight grind, even with some profile blending, will result in greater lifter acceleration and decelleration and not be the most ideal solution. But for a couple hundred bucks I can have a couple extra sets lying around for rainy days.

Is my math wrong? Base circle reduction is added directly to lift as lobe pivot point is effectively moved, while cam center point is unchanged, right?

Over simplified, Over-exagerated version of what I'm thinking...


Last edited by RicerSchnitzzle; 01-28-2009 at 06:27 PM.
Old 01-28-2009, 09:53 PM
  #24  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The second pic is actually more like the original. Our cams are very very pointy. We don't have that smooth bull nose on the cam like the Chevy cams do. I think Hammer said why not, but I forgot.

Last edited by BC; 01-28-2009 at 10:22 PM.
Old 01-29-2009, 10:50 AM
  #25  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If you increase the lift without decreasing the base circle, you may not be able to get the cam into the cam housing.

Dennis
Old 01-29-2009, 11:39 AM
  #26  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The bearings are not affected Dennis.
Old 01-29-2009, 12:38 PM
  #27  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Brendan,

It isn't the bearings but the opening size for the bearings. If the lift is too high and the cam radius is larger than the radius of the bearing housing the cam can't be installed in the housing.

Dennis
Old 01-29-2009, 12:45 PM
  #28  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis Wilson
Brendan,

It isn't the bearings but the opening size for the bearings. If the lift is too high and the cam radius is larger than the radius of the bearing housing the cam can't be installed in the housing.

Dennis
That would indeed be true if I was wanting to get some grinding done on the nose of the lobe, as Mike Ford did on the pelican forums (pics there). He reduced base circle AND had the cam welded, but had to remove the tip of the cam in the calculations because it was close or at the bearing diameter as you suggest.

If what I want works, it will only remove base circle, MAYBE with some work to the ramp area, and nothing to the nose of the cam, thereby not affecting the way it fits in the housing.

******

But I did have a thought - its expensive, but so is everything else in a Porsche - all that needs to be done to REALLY get a big stick in there is some longer valves with *more* (edit) installed height, stock or solid lifters, and boring new, larger bearings in the housing itself (like enlarging main holes in a block) and then adding diameter to each of the bearings. Or making a cam with every profil you want and bearings large enough to be larger in diameter than the cam lobes.

Is that cheaper than putting on a 4V head with super cams? Probably not, but its a cool idea.

Last edited by BC; 01-29-2009 at 08:24 PM.
Old 01-29-2009, 01:00 PM
  #29  
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Brendan,

Agree about reducing the base circle to increase the lift. My comment was in reference to the second picture that showed the lift increased above the current radius. I should have been more explicit.

Concerning your thought, why not source thinner bearings and open up the bearing housing ports? That would give you more wiggle room and would be less likely to weaken the housing.

Dennis
Old 01-29-2009, 01:33 PM
  #30  
BC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The bearings in all of my housings have BEEN the housings. So I was not aware of actual bearings, replaceable type, in the cam housings?


Quick Reply: More base circle questions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:22 AM.