Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

CA Smog check- A data point

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2008 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Thread Starter
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,713
Likes: 2,881
From: Irvine, CA
Default CA Smog check- A data point

Just got back from the biennial smog check for the GT. The shop owner was very cool, he had a Bitter SC in the bay (looks like a Ferrari 308 GT4) and was surprised that I knew what it was. So we got off on a good foot.

Beforehand I went out and drove up and down the 405 in 4th gear for about 20 minutes to get everything nice and toasty. The car has the original factory cat, a new O2 sensor, and mostly new everything under the hood. Bone stock. The guy took a pretty thorough look under the hood, but never got down and looked underneath.

According to the inspection report, apparently my car is in the 'high emitter' profile......


Just as a data point, here are the numbers.


Last edited by Rob Edwards; 06-10-2010 at 09:05 PM.
Old 06-10-2010 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Thread Starter
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,713
Likes: 2,881
From: Irvine, CA
Default 2 year update

No change to the car other than having changed the oil twice, the 2/6 rod bearings, and plating all the hardware. Somewhat cleaner than 2 years ago:

Old 06-10-2010 | 09:13 PM
  #3  
SQLGuy's Avatar
SQLGuy
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 3
From: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Default

I'd actually be a little worried to see CO numbers that low. Sounds a bit too lean. Rings/compression looks to be good, though.
Old 06-10-2010 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
cali4sun's Avatar
cali4sun
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 923
Likes: 2
From: Pismo Beach, CA
Default

Interesting.. Your numbers changed quite a bit in 2 years...I'm gonna print it out for comparison... I have to take my 928 in next week for its 2 year smog. It would be interesting to compare. Mine is stock.....

'89 S4 GP White/Black
'76 912E Silver/Black

Last edited by cali4sun; 06-10-2010 at 09:47 PM.
Old 06-10-2010 | 09:48 PM
  #5  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

Technically speaking, those are quite high from what I have seen on other reports. Anyone else have their data?
Old 06-10-2010 | 10:33 PM
  #6  
Bill Ball's Avatar
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,648
Likes: 49
From: Buckeye, AZ
Default

Mine also got worse in terms of HC and NO over the two year interim from the previous test and I barely passed last time. Actually I falied and the guy let me go out an bomb the freeway for a while then retest and I just passed. I think my cats are going south finally.
Old 06-10-2010 | 11:12 PM
  #7  
dr bob's Avatar
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,506
Likes: 549
From: Bend, Oregon
Default

FWIW, there seem to be differences between test stations and almost from day to day at the same stations. Might be the angle of the sun or phase of the moon.

Also-- The small variations in after-cat readings are pretty close to worthless for diagnosing a motor condition, at least until something overwhelms the cats.
Old 06-11-2010 | 03:50 AM
  #8  
danglerb's Avatar
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,575
Likes: 3
From: Orange, Cal
Default

Big change in 15 mph rpm, 1768 first time and 2169 the second, not much off the 25 mph rpm of 2303.
Old 06-12-2010 | 02:36 AM
  #9  
Chazz's Avatar
Chazz
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

My last three or four results are very similar to yours.
Old 06-14-2012 | 09:08 PM
  #10  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Thread Starter
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,713
Likes: 2,881
From: Irvine, CA
Default Another 2 years

2 more years, another biennial smog. Made an appointment, drove the car 20 miles on the freeway, got everything nice and warm, pulled right onto the rollers, never turned the engine off. The car is bone stock so no worries about visual tests.

Did only a visual on the gas cap, they don't have the adapter for it.

Here's the current result.



And here's the whole smog history for the GT, just for comparison

Old 05-28-2014 | 07:49 PM
  #11  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Thread Starter
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,713
Likes: 2,881
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, but I got the stroker smogged today. 6.5 L stroker with headers and CARB cats. Compares nicely to the getting-tired factory cats on my old GT.

Tiny bit rich at 15 mph, tiny bit lean at 25. Beforehand I went out and sharktuned at 15 and 25 mph in 2nd gear on level ground (slowest laps of the Kimberly speedway ever.....) with the NBO2 sensor disabled, then added it back infor the test.


Have I mentioned I love the ST2 and SP?

Old 05-28-2014 | 07:52 PM
  #12  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

Your avatar is disturbing.

Last edited by BC; 05-28-2014 at 08:11 PM.
Old 05-28-2014 | 08:07 PM
  #13  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Thread Starter
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,713
Likes: 2,881
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Better now?
Old 05-28-2014 | 08:10 PM
  #14  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

LOlz. Yes, much better. But since I have my victim hat on for this post/thread, the color clarity of the paint of the car in that picture is offensive to me. I don't see any scratches. And the fact that your stickers are clean makes me jealous.
Old 05-28-2014 | 08:11 PM
  #15  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

The buried story here is you passed with headers.


Quick Reply: CA Smog check- A data point



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:07 AM.