Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

THE OFFICIAL: E85 Fuel Conversion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2009, 06:20 PM
  #91  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,808
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Yes.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...st-2009-a.html
Old 08-26-2009, 10:47 PM
  #92  
SMTCapeCod
Race Car
 
SMTCapeCod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mechanochondriacism
Posts: 4,698
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Default vroom

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Izu7XyGQFY
Old 01-07-2012, 12:21 AM
  #93  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

When doing an E85 conversion it has been reccomended that we change all of the rubber components in our fuel systems. Fuel lines with a viton liner will work well for the flexible lines. Some say that the hard lines need to be stainless but there are a few 951 guys who have been using E85 in stock hard lines for up to 5 years so far without any problems. One of the components that I wondered about was the plastic fuel tank. If a custom stainless tank was required it would be a very involved fabrication process. One that I don't really want to have to tackle if I don't have to and one that is beyond the scope of most people. I decided to test the stock 928 fuel tank for ethanol compatability.

It's been over a year since I began testing the fuel tank for compatability with E85. The tank has seen ZERO ill effects from the E85. It hasn't softened or become brittle. It is just as it was when I dropped it into a mason jar full of E85 in December 2010. The E85 did not become discolored. It remained crystal clear.

Around April 2010 I put a new piece of fuel injection hose into the E85 to see if it would soften. Within a week the E85 began to turn brown, then black. The color was leeching out of the hose. I thought that the next step would be that the rubber would soften. IT HASN'T. The hose is exactly the same hardness that it was before I put it in the E85 over 8 months ago. I left half of the hose sticking out of the E85. It looks and feels exactly the same as the part that is submerged. In fact, it is so unaffected that the other day while checking the hose for deterioration I dropped it on the floor by mistake. I picked it up and when I went to stick it back into the E85 I couldn't determine which side was supposed to be in the ethanol. I finally smelled the ends of the hose and figured it out immediately. If it wasn't for the smell I would have had to guess. I was filming this to post here so once I edit the video you will get to see this.

I've decided to do additional fuel component testing. The hose that goes from the fuel tank outlet to the fuel pump inlet as well as the seal that seals the screw in tank outlet adapter are now taking an ethanol bath. The hose was a good used one that I took off of a car I parted out. It should be indicative of the hoses on most peoples cars that might want to do this conversion. The seal isn't that important to be ethanol resistant becasue it can be easily replaced with a Viton oring. But I had it lying around ( new ) and decided I would test it in the interest of science.

I'll post the video once I get a chance to look at it and edit it down to a reasonable length. I tend to ramble

Last edited by Fabio421; 01-07-2012 at 12:45 PM.
Old 01-07-2012, 12:35 AM
  #94  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Great!
Old 01-07-2012, 01:55 PM
  #95  
S4ordie
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Rennlist Member
 
S4ordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 8,856
Received 335 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

Good information Fabio, thanks for posting.

My only comments are relative to your testing. Having the hoses, seals, etc., just sitting in static E85 is not nearly the same as the conditions these parts will be exposed to (heat, high pressure, fuel flowing, etc.). Materials can have a significant, exponential, deterioration rate when subjected to real world environmental conditions. Not sure I am yet willing to believe E85 is benign on older fuel systems.

I tend to overdo/over-engineer/over-repair things so as to minimize future issues. Most of this behavior is totally unnecessary but not unusual for a person like me with a sphincter capable of taking a bite out of the seat cushion I sit upon (same as **** retentive).

Thanks again for your ongoing study. It helps further the knowledge.

Originally Posted by Fabio421
When doing an E85 conversion it has been reccomended that we change all of the rubber components in our fuel systems. Fuel lines with a viton liner will work well for the flexible lines. Some say that the hard lines need to be stainless but there are a few 951 guys who have been using E85 in stock hard lines for up to 5 years so far without any problems. One of the components that I wondered about was the plastic fuel tank. If a custom stainless tank was required it would be a very involved fabrication process. One that I don't really want to have to tackle if I don't have to and one that is beyond the scope of most people. I decided to test the stock 928 fuel tank for ethanol compatability.

It's been over a year since I began testing the fuel tank for compatability with E85. The tank has seen ZERO ill effects from the E85. It hasn't softened or become brittle. It is just as it was when I dropped it into a mason jar full of E85 in December 2010. The E85 did not become discolored. It remained crystal clear.

Around April 2010 I put a new piece of fuel injection hose into the E85 to see if it would soften. Within a week the E85 began to turn brown, then black. The color was leeching out of the hose. I thought that the next step would be that the rubber would soften. IT HASN'T. The hose is exactly the same hardness that it was before I put it in the E85 over 8 months ago. I left half of the hose sticking out of the E85. It looks and feels exactly the same as the part that is submerged. In fact, it is so unaffected that the other day while checking the hose for deterioration I dropped it on the floor by mistake. I picked it up and when I went to stick it back into the E85 I couldn't determine which side was supposed to be in the ethanol. I finally smelled the ends of the hose and figured it out immediately. If it wasn't for the smell I would have had to guess. I was filming this to post here so once I edit the video you will get to see this.

I've decided to do additional fuel component testing. The hose that goes from the fuel tank outlet to the fuel pump inlet as well as the seal that seals the screw in tank outlet adapter are now taking an ethanol bath. The hose was a good used one that I took off of a car I parted out. It should be indicative of the hoses on most peoples cars that might want to do this conversion. The seal isn't that important to be ethanol resistant becasue it can be easily replaced with a Viton oring. But I had it lying around ( new ) and decided I would test it in the interest of science.

I'll post the video once I get a chance to look at it and edit it down to a reasonable length. I tend to ramble
Old 01-07-2012, 05:08 PM
  #96  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Best practices would require flouro- whatever bases fuel hoses. But it seems that the aluminum pieces may not be as seriously affected as thought.
Old 01-07-2012, 06:13 PM
  #97  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S4ordie
Good information Fabio, thanks for posting.

My only comments are relative to your testing. Having the hoses, seals, etc., just sitting in static E85 is not nearly the same as the conditions these parts will be exposed to (heat, high pressure, fuel flowing, etc.). Materials can have a significant, exponential, deterioration rate when subjected to real world environmental conditions. Not sure I am yet willing to believe E85 is benign on older fuel systems.

I tend to overdo/over-engineer/over-repair things so as to minimize future issues. Most of this behavior is totally unnecessary but not unusual for a person like me with a sphincter capable of taking a bite out of the seat cushion I sit upon (same as **** retentive).

Thanks again for your ongoing study. It helps further the knowledge.
Well, in that case I don't know what I could say to ease your mind. I can tell you that a few of the 944 turbo guys have been using E85 for years on stock fuel systems without any ill effect. Theres one guy over there "Rogue Ant" who has been running E85 for about 5 years. I will be running the E85 in my car and after some time I will be able to tell you if there are any problems. I just wanted to know if certain bits would hold up to the E85. Parts that aren't easy to replace with a new modern material that is already known to be compatible. Parts like the fuel tank and the specially shaped fuel hose would be difficult to source in an alternate material.
Old 01-07-2012, 08:40 PM
  #98  
jmartins
Instructor
 
jmartins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have to pay attention on this thread... All Brazilian gasoline has between 22,5% and 27% of ethanol (it's a law down here) - more ethanol than E85. Our gasoline stoichiometric rate is 11 instead of 14,7 for regular gasoline. But our fuel has between 98 to 107 octanes due to ethanol blend. Fuel specification changed here in mid 80's (many ears after my car's birth) so I have to think what I have to do, because my car will probably run leaner.
Old 01-07-2012, 10:10 PM
  #99  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Just as a correction- e85 stands for 85% ethanol and 15% petrol.
Old 01-08-2012, 07:28 AM
  #100  
jmartins
Instructor
 
jmartins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
Just as a correction- e85 stands for 85% ethanol and 15% petrol.
Thank you for the information !

It's about the same fuel we have here since 80's but we call it as Ethanol. It was a common conversion here in Brazil.
Old 09-17-2013, 09:37 AM
  #101  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

So, what's the E85 prognosis, 5 years in? As BC said in this thread, looks like cheap race fuel to me! I found several links online of people running E85 in all sorts of cars with zero issues, other than the occasional CEL. One dude's truck stalled, but that's probably because his fuel system wasn't clean and the uber clean ethanol loosened some gunk.

Here's an interesting example:

http://www.openfuelstandard.org/2012...h-alcohol.html

I'm considering this for my car since I'm catless. That, however, doesn't really seem to matter. I have bigger injectors on hand I can swap in (42 lbs) and its easy enough to advance the timing to compensate (but how much?).

As the OP said, please no political comments about gas vs. corngas.

Old 09-17-2013, 10:05 AM
  #102  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S4ordie
Good information Fabio, thanks for posting.

My only comments are relative to your testing. Having the hoses, seals, etc., just sitting in static E85 is not nearly the same as the conditions these parts will be exposed to (heat, high pressure, fuel flowing, etc.). Materials can have a significant, exponential, deterioration rate when subjected to real world environmental conditions. Not sure I am yet willing to believe E85 is benign on older fuel systems.

I tend to overdo/over-engineer/over-repair things so as to minimize future issues. Most of this behavior is totally unnecessary but not unusual for a person like me with a sphincter capable of taking a bite out of the seat cushion I sit upon (same as **** retentive).

Thanks again for your ongoing study. It helps further the knowledge.
I just re-read your concerns and realized that I missed something the first time around. The parts that I tested were parts that are not easily replaceable with modern, E85 compatible parts. The fuel tank and specially shaped fuel hose that goes from the tank to the pump. Neither of these parts see pressure and very little heat. The injection hoses do see pressure but those are easily replaced with modern hose that is compatible with E-85.

My car is now in pieces and the Flex-Fuel conversion is in full swing. It should be on the road in a few weeks. I'll report back once that happens.
Old 09-17-2013, 10:15 AM
  #103  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

More fuel for the fuel fire:

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/h...l/viewall.html
Old 09-17-2013, 12:21 PM
  #104  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
I just re-read your concerns and realized that I missed something the first time around. The parts that I tested were parts that are not easily replaceable with modern, E85 compatible parts. The fuel tank and specially shaped fuel hose that goes from the tank to the pump. Neither of these parts see pressure and very little heat. The injection hoses do see pressure but those are easily replaced with modern hose that is compatible with E-85.

My car is now in pieces and the Flex-Fuel conversion is in full swing. It should be on the road in a few weeks. I'll report back once that happens.
Cool. Keep us updated. The only new info I have is all rational - old fuel hoses need to be replaced anyway. Use Flouro-based hoses when you can. It does not affect the plastic tank - it must be polyethylene.
Old 09-17-2013, 12:24 PM
  #105  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Courtshark
Just to clarify, California has alot more than three stations. Just in San Diego there are three.



Quick Reply: THE OFFICIAL: E85 Fuel Conversion Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:49 AM.