Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2008, 09:16 PM
  #1  
Kevin Michael
Rocket Pilot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Kevin Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: gettysburg pa.
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default flywheel

looking for a decent one for my 87 s4. Anyone?
Old 02-13-2008, 09:22 PM
  #2  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

There are plenty if you wanted to switch to a dual disk clutch.
Old 02-13-2008, 09:40 PM
  #3  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Plenty? Brendan, what would you suggest I used for my car to go DD?
Old 02-13-2008, 09:57 PM
  #4  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
Plenty? Brendan, what would you suggest I used for my car to go DD?
http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/...umflywheel.php

Dual disk flywheel, but with the 60-2 timing ring needed for an S4.

Then just get a dual disk clutch kit and intermediate plate.

Simple!
Old 02-14-2008, 08:58 AM
  #5  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Upper bellhousing is also different.
Old 02-14-2008, 09:49 AM
  #6  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Upper bellhousing is also different.
"upper"? I don't think so. In what I have read, nobody mentions this. My 90 GT is getting a dual disc upgrade this week...
Old 02-14-2008, 10:16 AM
  #7  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,549
Received 2,168 Likes on 1,225 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
"upper"? I don't think so. In what I have read, nobody mentions this. My 90 GT is getting a dual disc upgrade this week...
When I asked about switching my 81 to an S4 style single disc clutch, Mr Bailey responded with: "You will need an S-4 5 speed upper bell housing"
Post #33:

https://rennlist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=268926

So I assumed the reverse would be true. I thought it had something to do with the clutch fork.
Old 02-14-2008, 10:20 AM
  #8  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Is twin and single disk clutch fork upper position in same place or not will determine if old style upper bellhousing is needed or not. I would vote they are different but not 100% sure about his. In any case they should be easy to find. Automatic upper housing will work fine. Just need to add ball into it.
Old 02-14-2008, 10:43 AM
  #9  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think it is likely that needing to change the upper bell housing would have been overlooked by those who I heard from about this .... It is a major project to change.
Old 02-14-2008, 12:06 PM
  #10  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The S-4 bellhousing is larger so plenty of room for the smaller dual disc assembly BUT trying to fit the LARGER S-4 clutch flywheel assembly in to the SMALLER early bell housing does not work .
Old 02-14-2008, 12:35 PM
  #11  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
The S-4 bellhousing is larger so plenty of room for the smaller dual disc assembly BUT trying to fit the LARGER S-4 clutch flywheel assembly in to the SMALLER early bell housing does not work .
Thank you for the clarification, I was suspecting it was something that the S4 clutch setup needed.
Old 02-14-2008, 03:18 PM
  #12  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

So thats why when i went to the older lower bell housing, the starter gear was rubbing slightly. (we had to grind a little area of the lower bellhosing down, kind of like cutting a notch in it) . however, I did keep the upper bellhousing in place. (stock S4) we went to the older bell housing to fit the starter with out the heavy mounting bracket. Plus, its very convenient set up with the starter just mounted directly to the older lower bell housing.

mk

Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
The S-4 bellhousing is larger so plenty of room for the smaller dual disc assembly BUT trying to fit the LARGER S-4 clutch flywheel assembly in to the SMALLER early bell housing does not work .
Old 02-14-2008, 03:35 PM
  #13  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

I was planning on removing that heavy bracket for the starter, but since then I have double-taken on the fact that it is an additional block support keeping the two halves together. Now I am not so sure I will want to sacrifice this strength at higher-than-stock HP for a few pounds savings.
Old 02-14-2008, 03:38 PM
  #14  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

anderson doesnt use it either. we also then use the small lightweight starter too.

mk

Originally Posted by BrendanC
I was planning on removing that heavy bracket for the starter, but since then I have double-taken on the fact that it is an additional block support keeping the two halves together. Now I am not so sure I will want to sacrifice this strength at higher-than-stock HP for a few pounds savings.



Quick Reply: flywheel



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:33 AM.