Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Engine building tips?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2007, 12:10 AM
  #16  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Simard
Bill, there's an SAE paper about testing the oil flow and temperature at the rod journal bearing with no-groove, half groove and full groove main bearings. testing shows significantly improved oil flow to the rod journal with a full groove and somewhat shocking is that a half groove starts to decline at high rpm while the full groove is still increasing. It makes a very strong case for using fully grooved main bearings in high performance engines. Also consider that how many times do you see a failed main but good rod bearing? maybe the mains can afford to loose a little load bearing area for the benefits of oil flow to the rod journal.
BTW, that SAE paper is 2000-01-1341. I'd be glad to discuss it with you or you can download it from SAE pretty cheaply.
Mike: I appreciate the info.
Old 06-23-2007, 12:27 AM
  #17  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Bill,

Did this engine fail under racing conditions. This is a race car correct? Or did this happen under street driving?
Old 06-23-2007, 01:17 AM
  #18  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Race. 7 laps. The track (Thunderhill) does have two moderately long sweepers.
Old 06-23-2007, 02:07 AM
  #19  
SwayBar
Race Car
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,514
Received 312 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
After two quick engine failures apparently involving 2/6 rod bearings (at least we have confirmed that on the second motor) despite Accusump,...

We are going to Chevy-drill the replacement crank. It will be cleaned, magnafluxed and polished. We are going to use rod bearings carefully mic'd for tolerance...

At this point we will be staying with the Accusump, although we need to carefully evaluate it and make sure it is working correctly. Dry sump is a neat idea but probably not going to happen. Ishihara-Johnson scraper and windage is also a neat idea, but doesn't appear to do anything for 2/6.

What else would you guys do internally? Have at it!
Drilling the crank, etc are all good ideas of course, but a drilled crank and it's bearings will still fail if the flow of oil is interrupted, or if the oil gets overly aerated by not controlling the oil and keeping it around the sump. Since a dry-sump is out of the question, then the next logical choice for oil-control would be a crankscraper and windage system such as Ishihara-Johnson's:

http://www.crank-scrapers.com/

Scroll down and look for the Dutch Stallion yellow 928 (..quote from link):

"Rob Van Kol, owner of Havik Racing Solutions in Houthalen-helchteren Belgium and his brother, Jean-Paul, campaign the Dutch Stallion Porsche S4 Evo. The engine ran the season at typical rpms of 6800 and is now run at 7200 (..RPMs) for a total of over 43 hours of racing with stable oil pressure and no engine damage whatsoever. This was accompanied by a 10 degree Celsius drop in coolant temperature from the previous years engine which had less power. This years engine is NA and develops 420 rwhp. It is important to note that without the windage system the previous years engine failed in two days running at 6300 rpms -- this is a critical rpm for the wet sump engine and to break through it reliably absolutely requires comprehensive windage and oil control."

That is a compelling story. According to Dutch Stallion, the I-J system has warded off 2/6 failure for over 43 racing hours with a redline of 7200 RPM!

I too have the full I-J system installed on my brand-new wet-sleeve motor and have run it once so far at Road America, and there is no doubt it really works.

http://www.roadamerica.com/images/maps/ra_map_2006.pdf

Going through the Carousel, my oil pressure remained stable whereas before I-J, the oil pressure would bounce around. Braking hard into Turn 8 the oil pressure remains stable whereas before it would bounce around. Those are the only places I'm able to take a peek at the oil pressure.

The most telling clue though was the temperature of the Accusump, or lack of temperature, after coming in from a 20-minute session; it was barely warm to the touch whereas prior to the I-J system, it would be blazing hot at engine temperature. Apparently the I-J system did such a good job keeping oil around the sump that the Accusump did not have to discharge and recharge too much, and that's on a really fast, heavy braking, high-g cornering track.

I think that without a doubt, the two most important things to do is to install the I-J system, and drill the crank. Those two items with a properly setup Accusump should eliminate another 2/6 catastrophe from happening due to oil starvation/aeration.

Oil control, oil control, and more oil control.
Old 06-23-2007, 02:31 AM
  #20  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Thunderhill has always been hell for both 951's and 928's. The off camber stuff just kills the oil slosh issue. I had a customer with a 951 that loved the off camber stuff and could go really fast on that part of the track. He killed his engine every time he went to Thunderhill, until we dry sumped it.

I've been full grooving the bearings in the engines with the Chevy drilling. There doesn't seem to be a downside. The main bearings never fail or have wear issues, so the surface area doesn't seem to be of any concern. The oil pump can deliver plenty of volume, so that is not an issue. And, of course, you need Amsoil. Don't need to pour it into the crankcase, just put a can behind the seat and everything will be fine (sorry Mark....couldn't help myself!)

Even dry sumped engines will kill rod bearings. There are many different reasons for the bearings to fail.....two if them are the drilling and the pan pick-up issues. There are a couple of more.....which makes the entire issue way more complex than it seems on the surface. The latest version of windage trays that we developed completely eliminated oil coming out of the head breathers. This means that the oil is staying in the pan. We were not able to detect the accusump even working at Fontana with the latest stuff. Fontana is not Thunderhill, however. If Thunderhill was my home track, I'd look carefully at a dry sump system, or get the best windage tray set-up you can find....and pray.

The factory rod bearings provide greater bearing clearance than the ones you buy from Glyco. We use the factory bearings, even though they are more expensive. The other alternative is to have the crankshaft "micropolished" longer a bit more than normal.....

Have fun!

gb
Old 06-23-2007, 04:19 AM
  #21  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Amzoil: 6 seasons with lots of 2:02 laps at Thunderhill, almost 100 race hours on the 928 engine.
Probably the fastest dependable race car in the world to date! all stock components.

all packed up and ready to hit Thunderhill tomorrow and sunday. Knock Knock! Dont jinkz me Downtown GB!

mk
Old 06-23-2007, 05:09 AM
  #22  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Swaybar: The I-J windage and scrapers are under discussison.

Greg: You mention a windage tray. Your own design, different from the I-J setup? As an aside, I think I need that, as I'm throwing a lot of oil out the filler breather in open road racing at very high speed. Thatnks for the vote for Chevy drilling and main bearing full grooving. And Dennis is going to carry a bottle of Amsoil in the car for now on.
Old 06-23-2007, 01:43 PM
  #23  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Bill:

Don't think I've seen the I-J (?) set-up. I've seen a few, but all that I've seen seem to have the same problem...they don't leave enough area for the oil to escape back to the pan. They almost seem to be designed to keep the oil in the upper part of the engine. We tried a scraper/windage tray/different pan set-up on Mark's engine once. The rod bearings almost lasted for the entire day....and that was with a dry sump. When you rev the engine up to 6000 and the dry sump tank slowly looses volume....there is something wrong.

gb
Old 06-23-2007, 01:46 PM
  #24  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bill - check the wiring, and as suggested, remove the electricly actuated valve for fool proof operation. Dont forget to renotch the dipstick. Also, clean, clean, clean.

Yes, the dry sump pan is ready for testing. We can now build the test engine

Dave/Shartskin, what are you taling about with the bearings???

The 928 has been run on the track for almost 10 years hard...with the same engine. And as far as I can tell, after running a stock engine up to 8000 rpm on adynohjet, the oil feeds to the rods never failed as long as their was stable un aeriated oil feeding the crank.

Cheers,
marc
Old 06-23-2007, 01:48 PM
  #25  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh, Louis' scrapers are about eh best I haveseen to date.
Old 06-23-2007, 01:57 PM
  #26  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Louis's scrapers are indeed works of art. I can't imagine the time it took him to build them, trimming off little bits at a time to make them fit that well. He's a genius with patience...a rare combination.

gb
Old 06-23-2007, 02:32 PM
  #27  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

OK, rereading...

Greg, I see you have developed your own windage. I don't suppose you offer it to other builders.

It looks like Louis is using the I-J scrapers. He links to them. They have Louis' custom touch (a drip edge). The trimming/grinding and tight fit is part of the I-J installation. Louis has his own windage design , but notes it is still experimental. What isn't in this car?

Thanks for the comments. Even more would be appreciated, especially about Chevy drilling of stock (non-stroker) cranks.

Last edited by Bill Ball; 06-23-2007 at 03:32 PM.
Old 06-23-2007, 02:56 PM
  #28  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Further word from Jim Morton - Dennis' crank is bent like a pretzel into an S-shape. All the mains are toast, of course.

Last edited by Bill Ball; 06-23-2007 at 03:34 PM.
Old 06-23-2007, 03:33 PM
  #29  
lorenolson888
Pro
 
lorenolson888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi Bill, Dennis...

Great thread... I am at home these days with the new future rennlister... my boy Alexander...

Let me know if youy need a hand... I can come by and do some menial tasks, take some pictures etc... I would love to helpout with some engine teardown and assembly!!!

Loren
Old 06-23-2007, 03:36 PM
  #30  
lorenolson888
Pro
 
lorenolson888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow..

bent crank!!! I guess once the bearings go the crank will go whatever direction it is pushed in huh...

I hope you guys find a good core soon... Did dennis pay for this engine that blew up so quick... was it refreshed in anyway before the tortuous 7 laps at thunderhill... this makes me rethink the idea of racing a stockish engine///


Quick Reply: Engine building tips?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:19 PM.