Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Scat Stroker Crank Balancing Act (6 cwt)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2007, 03:55 AM
  #76  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingDog
Erkka's pictures are unmodified 968 pistons. It's 944 S2 pistons that would need to be modded apparently from the pics.
944 S2 pistons would need quite heavy mods to clear block also. Notice how low piston comes at BDC. Lowest part of skirt is some 13-14mm below block cylinder wall. Now check Adam's piston pic in #36. Wide skirt below wrist pin hole in S2 piston needs to go almost totally I think for piston to clear part of the block which is sticking out into cylinder bore. The one where squirter is in early '87 block. 968 piston barely clears this as there is nothing in it on the sides of skirts. 968 piston is only factory part I know which don't need serious mods.

After trying rod and piston into all cylinders I'm thinking I need to get 1 or 2 mm metal taken of from crank counterweights or from pistons below wrist pins. Piston goes so close to weight that there isn't any room between them at BDC. 1 or 2 mm's empty space would be good I think. Also pistons come 0.3mm above deck on TDC. Might need thicker head gasket and/or little larger cuts for valves on piston tops. And rod upper end could have little more clearance sideways too. On closer inspection there are many small details which need to be taken care off which simply would not be issue with stock parts.
Old 06-26-2007, 09:02 AM
  #77  
Mike Simard
Three Wheelin'
 
Mike Simard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Stan, the basic bobweight formula is:
Bob weight = (1 x rotating stuff) + (.5 x reciprocating stuff)

Your shop's hand written paper must be confusing to anyone but the guy who wrote it, they wrote one entry for a piston etc and two entries for rod big end, it's just their way of adding it up but looks correct.
Old 06-26-2007, 11:49 AM
  #78  
svp928
Rennlist Member
 
svp928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: central cal
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AH! Stan, now I see what you are after- If the shop says you need to add 500 grams of heavy metal to the counterweight, that is about 3.3 inches of heavy metal. (ours was 1.5 times heavier than steel) Steel is 101 grams per inch at 1inch diameter, heavy metal is 150 grams per inch at 1" diameter. So, he would drill into the counterweight 3.3 inches, removing about 333 grams, and put in 500 grams of heavy metal. This is a bob weight difference of 167 grams, and thats how much weight you need to lose out of the bob weight for your crank to not need heavy metal.
I am assuming (bad word) he doesn't mean 500 grams TOTAL weight out-of-balance- this would mean nearly 10 inches of heavy metal to make up that amount. Most cranks don't have enough area to put 10 inches of holes into!

So, 167 grams is probably do-able with Carrillo rods and lighter pistons.
500 grams is probably out of the question.

Hope that helps

Steve
Old 06-26-2007, 08:21 PM
  #79  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Steve,

My understanding is that it needs 500g of weight added, but I will confirm.
Old 06-26-2007, 08:28 PM
  #80  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Stan, just call Whitey and ask him what the crank is balanced for....

Hi Steve!!

Marc
Old 06-26-2007, 09:29 PM
  #81  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Marc, Would I reach him at the main number listed on the website: 310 370 5501 ?

You wouldn't happen to have an email address for him, would you?
Old 06-27-2007, 04:05 AM
  #82  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Isn't Whitey working at Moldex, not in Scat?
Old 06-27-2007, 05:58 AM
  #83  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Here are my component weights.

I don't have the hanging rig to measure the ends of the rods separately, so I just used Stan's numbers since I believe we have the same Oliver rods.

Rod Rotating 466
Rod Rotating 466
Rod Recip 175.5
Piston 473.5
Pin 124
Rings 33.6
Rod Bearing 96
Locks 1.5
Oil 6.0
Total: 1842.1

So, what does it all mean? How much Mallory will I need?
Old 06-27-2007, 06:30 AM
  #84  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
Here are my component weights.
So, what does it all mean? How much Mallory will I need?
I hope to get there tomorrow and fnd out more. If you look back at my first post, you see they subtract the bob weight from 2870.2g then divide by 2 to arrive at the mallory required. I don't know where 2870.2 came from, but for now presume it comes from the dynamic balance machine.

Until I know more, a reduced bob weight doesn't help (mine could be @1819.3), since subtracting it from 2870.2 and diving by 2 will give a larger amount of mallory needed.
Old 06-27-2007, 11:44 AM
  #85  
svp928
Rennlist Member
 
svp928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: central cal
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stan, I don't know where that 2870 number came from, either, but I know the balance weight and position are determined by the machine, not a hand calculation. At least on the Stewart-Warner type of machines... I would talk to your man at Scat and ask him what they used as a target bobweight for that crank. I don't recall ever seeing that large an imbalance, even on an old 454 Chev when changing it over to internal balance from external... Your bobweight is not high compared to stock components, in fact its lighter, so you shouldn't be needing that much weight... and I don't recall seeing any other posts about this crank requiring huge balance weight..
Something is not right here...???
Old 06-27-2007, 11:55 AM
  #86  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by svp928
... but I know the balance weight and position are determined by the machine, not a hand calculation. At least on the Stewart-Warner type of machines... I would talk to your man at Scat and ask him what they used as a target bobweight for that crank. I don't recall ever seeing that large an imbalance, even on an old 454 Chev when changing it over to internal balance from external... Your bobweight is not high compared to stock components, in fact its lighter, so you shouldn't be needing that much weight... and I don't recall seeing any other posts about this crank requiring huge balance weight..
Something is not right here...???
Thanks, I was hoping for a calculation I could replicate to determine what I needed for bob weight. I guess the premise of a hand calculation is contrary to a dynamic balance.

Unfortunately, I don't have a contact at Scat.

My local machine shop did say this is the most out of balance they have seen in 17 years of business...

I haven't found anyone yet with this same crank in balance. If you do, let me know!

Thanks for the thoughts.
Old 06-27-2007, 12:00 PM
  #87  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,930
Received 39 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Ask our highly skilled Sales Staff anything
you need to know about Crankshafts, Rods and Pistons.

Drop us a line at Cranktech@ScatEnterprises.com
SCAT Enterprises, Inc.
1400 Kingsdale Avenue
Redondo Beach, CA 90278

Phone: 310 370 5501
Fax: 310 214 2285
Old 06-27-2007, 03:42 PM
  #88  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sorry, I thought it was a moldex crank. Whitey works at Moldex.

It is a Scat 6 cwt crank??? Call the folks you bought it from and ask for their rep.

Marc
Old 06-27-2007, 03:50 PM
  #89  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc@DEVEK
Sorry, I thought it was a moldex crank. Whitey works at Moldex.

It is a Scat 6 cwt crank??? Call the folks you bought it from and ask for their rep.

Marc
It was purchased from a person, not a company.
Old 06-27-2007, 03:55 PM
  #90  
svp928
Rennlist Member
 
svp928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: central cal
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stan, give the number in Johns post a call and see if you can find out more about the crank's build specs


Quick Reply: Scat Stroker Crank Balancing Act (6 cwt)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:22 AM.