Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Official SHARKTUNER thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2009, 12:52 PM
  #301  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Hi Andrew,
Glad you are getting to the final stages of tuning ! Are you still using DR's boost module ?
Yes I am. It makes all the difference in the world. As soon as you hit boost, it goes into the WOT map and richens the mixture. There's no tip in or waiting for the LH the 'catch up." It should also allow for a little more aggressive timing if there is knocking caused by lack of fuel.

BTW, I just realized my previous post neglects to say dropping into the 12's under boost is a very good thing!
Old 10-12-2009, 01:11 PM
  #302  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,055
Received 309 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Actually, what I meant was to be able to merge the adaptation map with the base map. This would be useful because the adaptation map has the advantage of collecting lots of data over time and averaging it. Of course, when you would do the merge, you would reset the adaptation map at the same time.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Dan, I though about that in the early days of my SharkPlotter project. The problems with that approach are that the averaging time isn't very long, and it is not accessible (except for the current cell). But with those aside I still don't like the idea of updating the maps without being able to see the effects. Logging the data, taking it to SP and being able to apply some smarter algorithms seemed to make more sense. SP looks at the number of data points for each cell, and also considers the effect of interpolation. Ignoring that would lead to a very "lumpy" map, not a big deal for the adaptation table because it is continuously being updated. But memorializing the lumps in the map didn't seem like such a hot idea.
Old 10-12-2009, 01:29 PM
  #303  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Agreed Jim.

BTW everyone, there is a new ST2 software Ver 6.0.6 release being field tested which sorts out the difference between LH and EZK Tenp 2 readings and also allows 4 x the size of datalogs to be run.
Old 10-12-2009, 01:41 PM
  #304  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Yes I am. It makes all the difference in the world. As soon as you hit boost, it goes into the WOT map and richens the mixture. There's no tip in or waiting for the LH the 'catch up." It should also allow for a little more aggressive timing if there is knocking caused by lack of fuel.

BTW, I just realized my previous post neglects to say dropping into the 12's under boost is a very good thing!
Ok, that's good...... I don't see it listed on DR's website ?
Old 10-12-2009, 01:52 PM
  #305  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Agreed Jim.

BTW everyone, there is a new ST2 software Ver 6.0.6 release being field tested which .... allows 4 x the size of datalogs to be run.
Old 10-13-2009, 06:01 PM
  #306  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Another question: why in the Ignition System Monitor tab in the ST app are the two air temp values always blank? At first I thought it was just my car, but all the screenshots of that tab in the ST2 manual are the same way.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 10-14-2009, 06:42 AM
  #307  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Another question: why in the Ignition System Monitor tab in the ST app are the two air temp values always blank? At first I thought it was just my car, but all the screenshots of that tab in the ST2 manual are the same way.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
I should have mentioned in the User Manual that this is an Airtemp indicator is for LH2.2 only....... the sensor in the base of the engine airfilter box.
Old 11-05-2009, 06:50 PM
  #308  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Does anyone know if the LH and EZK bin files that come with the ST2 to load the PEM's will pass emission inspections?

John,
It would be nice to have a "stock" set of maps to down load for emission inspections. Much easier than pulling the computers and swapping chips every couple of years.

When you do update the ST2 software, can you make the start logging button bigger and have a "check all" button for logged items?
Old 11-05-2009, 07:22 PM
  #309  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
Does anyone know if the LH and EZK bin files that come with the ST2 to load the PEM's will pass emission inspections?

John,
It would be nice to have a "stock" set of maps to down load for emission inspections. Much easier than pulling the computers and swapping chips every couple of years.

When you do update the ST2 software, can you make the start logging button bigger and have a "check all" button for logged items?
You could just load the default maps and set your injector size. Assuming you still have an O2 sensor and are running closed-loop, I don't see why you wouldn't pass. Even if the maps were off, the O2 loop would take care of it up to +/- 20%, and that's without adaptation.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 11-05-2009, 07:38 PM
  #310  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

The default maps are not really stock maps.
The O2 loop is holding it at around 13.5-13.8
Old 11-05-2009, 11:48 PM
  #311  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
The default maps are not really stock maps.
The O2 loop is holding it at around 13.5-13.8
13.x at idle/cruise? What is the O2 compensation % on the fuel parameters screen? Unless the compensation is maxed out at -20%, you are either around 14.7 and your WBO2 is reading incorrectly too low (or the programmed WBO2 law is off), or there is a problem with your O2 sensor/LH.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 11-06-2009, 05:39 AM
  #312  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Hi John,
The default maps are stock maps, copied from the stock EPROMS. As Dan says, if you are running closed loop, then you should have no problem at all with emmissions.

O2 loop % will not always be at zero, because of adaptation. But of copurse at idle cruise, A?F should be 14.7:1

Have added you suggestions to the list :-)
Old 11-06-2009, 07:02 AM
  #313  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I just put back the stock chips. Will monitor the AF when I take it out in the next few days.

The cruise and idle were staying in the 13's with a dip into the 12's with WOT and high RPMs.
I saw compensations from 2% up to 18%.

I won't be able to do anymore monitoring with the ST2 until the spring

John,
Based on my "seat of the pants" the car drove different with the PEM and your files vs. the stock chips.
Are the adaptation parameters different with your software or does it always target 14.7 in closed loop?
Old 11-06-2009, 07:11 AM
  #314  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Was this a stock GT you were using for this ? If not, what is engine spec of car used ?

Clearly the A/F ratio is way out at cruise and idle, if it is running closed loop ?

There's nothing diiferent from stock chips in the ST bin files. Adaptation values do vary from car to car.
Old 11-06-2009, 09:00 AM
  #315  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Stock except for an X-pipe.

I added the cats back on for inspection and it still runs the same.

I did notice when using the non-cat, no sensor maps it was running leaner. Would see some 15's.

Would the PEM adapt differently than the stock chips? I can tell you the car runs different with the PEM vs. the stock chips. Even the first day I installed them and ran the car. I mean a good different.

I'll see what my AF look like with the GT configured 100% stock except for the wideband.


Quick Reply: Official SHARKTUNER thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:23 PM.