Rebuilding 1988 manual transaxle after wasting $2710 at local shop
#76
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interior shift rod at neutral postion, 1988 transaxle
I will try to clarify... Rod in center is the so called "interior" shift rod that goes outside the case and connects to the main shift tube above the torque tube. Now look at the bottom of the photo (in post #77) and you will see where the arm rests properly in the depression of the 2/3 shift rod. At the top of the photo you can see that the arm does not rest properly above the depression in the 4/5 shift rod. It rests too far to the right in the photo. What this means in reality is that 2/3 shifts can be done easily (which is the way Porsche wants it) but that to engage 4th or 5th gear one would have to pull back slightly on the shift **** (moving the interior shift rod forward a few millimeters), then move the shift **** to the right to engage the 4/5 shift rod.
Just wondering if this is normal,..... why would they force the driver to move the shift **** back at all to engage 4th or 5th gear. Just not sensical.
*** Note: remember the shift rod that connects to the transmission (aft of the shifter ****) moves forward when the shifter is moved backwards. This is because the shift tube in front stays stationary and the rear tube is mounted slightly under the front tube .... underneath the shift ****. (see diagram).
Bruce Toski
Just wondering if this is normal,..... why would they force the driver to move the shift **** back at all to engage 4th or 5th gear. Just not sensical.
*** Note: remember the shift rod that connects to the transmission (aft of the shifter ****) moves forward when the shifter is moved backwards. This is because the shift tube in front stays stationary and the rear tube is mounted slightly under the front tube .... underneath the shift ****. (see diagram).
Bruce Toski
Last edited by 72Audi; 05-08-2007 at 11:37 AM. Reason: additional pic found
#77
Is it the way that picture was taken or is that lower shift finger bent? The lower portion looks bent to the left causing the upper finger pawl to seem slightly forward (to the right) of the notch in the upper selector shaft. Also I'm not real familiar with the BW synchros but the dog teeth in first gear seem awfully close to be in the nueral position.
#78
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yah I see what you mean ..... this is what I am worried about .... that it is bent.
See post #76 for specs I posted on the synchro gaps. I think you are right about that too.
BT
UPDATE:
Here is how it sits with shift rod removed.
Looks ok here !
See post #76 for specs I posted on the synchro gaps. I think you are right about that too.
BT
UPDATE:
Here is how it sits with shift rod removed.
Looks ok here !
Last edited by 72Audi; 05-08-2007 at 11:26 AM. Reason: updated pic
#79
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by 72Audi
Just wondering if this is normal,..... why would they force the driver to move the shift **** back at all to engage 4th or 5th gear. Just not sensical.
Edit: Bent selector is another matter. Still they do not always aling perfectly and yet gearbox works.
#80
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spring 928 303 034 09 is more important to check ...
Erkka,
Thanks for fixin the pics in your post.
The torsion spring in my 88 appears to be made of a different steel.
1982 parts diagram does not illustrate the tension spring
1991 parts book show it as item #13 but with two part #s:
928 303 034 09 (number you posted)
928 303 306 01 (no idea what this is)
Attached is a screen shot of page nine out of the extra training manual for V8 MT cars. It explains the changeover to the torsion spring that we are discussing here.
My spring looks to be in good shape.
(can't see how to post pics "in" between my text like you guys ...)
BToski
Thanks for fixin the pics in your post.
The torsion spring in my 88 appears to be made of a different steel.
1982 parts diagram does not illustrate the tension spring
1991 parts book show it as item #13 but with two part #s:
928 303 034 09 (number you posted)
928 303 306 01 (no idea what this is)
Attached is a screen shot of page nine out of the extra training manual for V8 MT cars. It explains the changeover to the torsion spring that we are discussing here.
My spring looks to be in good shape.
(can't see how to post pics "in" between my text like you guys ...)
BToski
#82
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Change from coil spring to flat spring was done at same time as syncro change, for -85 MY. There are two versions of flat spring. Drawing shows early version while S4 and later use late style, same as in your picture. Count yourself lucky when spring is ok. I would change it just to be on safe side even though there is no visible signs of problems. $$$ is much better spend on it than some of the factory tools for example.
928 303 306 01 is most likely bolt through gearbox casing at lower end of 928 303 034 09. There are two versions of this also. Early one has circlip which holds lower end on the bold and spacer on other side against gearbox casing. S4 and later have only bolt. This makes it easier to change flat spring without taking out almost entire gearbox content. Though its possible to do change also on circlip version just by removing cover and pushing 4-5 selector rod out from fork.
928 303 306 01 is most likely bolt through gearbox casing at lower end of 928 303 034 09. There are two versions of this also. Early one has circlip which holds lower end on the bold and spacer on other side against gearbox casing. S4 and later have only bolt. This makes it easier to change flat spring without taking out almost entire gearbox content. Though its possible to do change also on circlip version just by removing cover and pushing 4-5 selector rod out from fork.
#83
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
more items damaged by the neanderthals across the street
1) Severals shift rods damaged, scored, bludgeoned on the ends. (guess they are not familiar with "brass" punches.
2) wrong lock washer installed on one or both of the adjustable shift forks. One had a sharp cut lock washer while the other bolt had "two" wave lock washers. Parts books show identical lock washer for each bolt, N 011 525 13
3) The interior shift rod was bludgeoned on the end toward the diff. But I really struggled with 1/R shift rod. One of the roll pins was bashed to hell and came out with excessive force (others came out fine). Then I discovered that the 1/R shift fork was not moving on the shaft easily. It took me an hour just to remove this shaft because the fork was scored internally and excessively tight on the 1/R shift rod. (see pics). It looks like the end of this shaft was ground down on a bench grinder. Once again it appears they did not use a brass punch when they should have.
BToski
2) wrong lock washer installed on one or both of the adjustable shift forks. One had a sharp cut lock washer while the other bolt had "two" wave lock washers. Parts books show identical lock washer for each bolt, N 011 525 13
3) The interior shift rod was bludgeoned on the end toward the diff. But I really struggled with 1/R shift rod. One of the roll pins was bashed to hell and came out with excessive force (others came out fine). Then I discovered that the 1/R shift fork was not moving on the shaft easily. It took me an hour just to remove this shaft because the fork was scored internally and excessively tight on the 1/R shift rod. (see pics). It looks like the end of this shaft was ground down on a bench grinder. Once again it appears they did not use a brass punch when they should have.
BToski
#85
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bearing replacement for the internal shaft
I am planning on changing these as I plan to remove them during case cleaning.
1st pic is case parts off 88 PET
Note items #4, #5 and #35
#5 is called as a Wellendichtring which translates to "rotary shaft seal".
I think the "*" next to the PN denotes that this seal - 928 303 120 01 - comes in the main gasket set ?
#4 is called a Führungsbuchse which translates to "guide bush."
928 301 502 03 $20.00 from 928 Specialists
"guide bush" is the cage plus the bearing inside ?
#35 is called a Lagerbuchse which translates to "bearing sleeve" or "bushing"
http://dict.leo.org/?lang=en&lp=ende
Is this the caged ball bearing inside #4 ?
999 203 003 00 $11.00 from 928 Specialists who call it a LINEAR BALL BEARING
It appears that the interior shift rod uses this #35 bearing at both ends, so I will need two.
Pic two shows the bearing in the forward section of the case. It has quite a bit of room to slide back and forth inside the housing there ! Have no idea how the circlip is going to be removed either !
BToski
1st pic is case parts off 88 PET
Note items #4, #5 and #35
#5 is called as a Wellendichtring which translates to "rotary shaft seal".
I think the "*" next to the PN denotes that this seal - 928 303 120 01 - comes in the main gasket set ?
#4 is called a Führungsbuchse which translates to "guide bush."
928 301 502 03 $20.00 from 928 Specialists
"guide bush" is the cage plus the bearing inside ?
#35 is called a Lagerbuchse which translates to "bearing sleeve" or "bushing"
http://dict.leo.org/?lang=en&lp=ende
Is this the caged ball bearing inside #4 ?
999 203 003 00 $11.00 from 928 Specialists who call it a LINEAR BALL BEARING
It appears that the interior shift rod uses this #35 bearing at both ends, so I will need two.
Pic two shows the bearing in the forward section of the case. It has quite a bit of room to slide back and forth inside the housing there ! Have no idea how the circlip is going to be removed either !
BToski
#86
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#5 is included in gasket set.
There is no need to change #4. It can remain in.
#35 is ball bearing I was writing about earlier in additional parts to change to your long list. The ones which loose their *****. It includes that partly broken pipe in your picture. ***** and pipe comes out in one piece. So its not circlip you are seeing in there. Pipe has inwards bend ends to hold ball gage in. Just pull or push that pipe out.
There is no need to change #4. It can remain in.
#35 is ball bearing I was writing about earlier in additional parts to change to your long list. The ones which loose their *****. It includes that partly broken pipe in your picture. ***** and pipe comes out in one piece. So its not circlip you are seeing in there. Pipe has inwards bend ends to hold ball gage in. Just pull or push that pipe out.
#87
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Pin on the left in you last picture is used with these:
Early style roller arm on left and late on right. S4 uses late style.
Early style roller arm on left and late on right. S4 uses late style.
900 309 013 00
The roll pins (three total) used on the 1/R and interior shift rod arm are:
N 013 317 1
I think you just brought a critical point to my attention.
Although these all appear to measure out as 5mm x 28mm roll pins, the singular pin #900 309 013 00 appears to be less "hollow" that the other pins, and it sure looks like the neanderthal rebuilder mixed them all up.
Think I will order them all up and change them all at this point.
Bruce Toski
#88
But you can replace #4 and the reason is that it can be beat up and bit. At least mine was.
#89
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BrendanC
But you can replace #4 and the reason is that it can be beat up and bit. At least mine was.
BToski
#90
Originally Posted by 72Audi
Mine does look beat as well (externally) and have no idea why at this point ...
BToski
BToski