Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Now, Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2007, 01:33 AM
  #76  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

From that chart Jon provided, it appears you don't have to be very lean to bump the NOX way up. So, the plugs may not be all that helpful. They probably will be nicely tanned.
Old 01-05-2007, 03:56 PM
  #77  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
From that chart Jon provided,
Proving that a picture is worth a thousand words

it appears you don't have to be very lean to bump the NOX way up. So, the plugs may not be all that helpful. They probably will be nicely tanned.
Probst's Bosch injection book shows A/F values along the x-axis. The max NOx value is at about 15.5:1. So, only a little lean and the emissions test is screwed.
Old 01-05-2007, 05:20 PM
  #78  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sorry to chime in late. I have some background in emissions and engine controls so hopeful can be of some help. It does look as if the engine is running lean. How lean and when is the question though. Narrow band sensors (like what the stock ECU uses for control) only tell you if you are toggling above and below stoich. I don't think there is much to be learned in looking at absolute outputs of the stock sensor. .1 vs .2 volts and .8 vs .9 is essentially the same thing. It shows the control is working. Trying to infer any A/F ratio from the voltages is really a stretch. If you really want to see what's happening, you need a wideband. The cats also may be oversized and not getting up to temperature, which would lower their efficiency drastically.
Old 01-05-2007, 05:34 PM
  #79  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
John Speake? Do you know if the LH has a limit on idle or part-throttle fuel injector pulse width? Or, in other words, why cannot the LH compensate (provided that it's running in lambda loop mode) for even a huge amount of false air by increasing pulse width to the maximum possible duty cycle? And if it was so able to compensate wouldn't the expectation then be a too-high idle?
Hello Dave,
I don't suspect the O2 sensor, or its wiring. Also the MAF is well enough in range for the O2 loop to function.

The range of the O2 loop is +/-20% or so around the nominal injector pulse widths.

Bear in mind the O2 sensor is working on an average of exhaust gas it sees. So I'm thinking that there may be some dodgy injectors, messing up the emmissions. e.g leaky injector (or even and igntion misfire) would pass unburnt fuel to the sensor, which would think "rich" and weaken out the mixture to the other 7 pots to get the average back to stoich.
Old 03-28-2007, 03:00 PM
  #80  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

This issue has been resolved.

Short story: carbon buildup. Solution: "BG" Treatment.

I'll post again later with more length.



Quick Reply: Now, Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:00 AM.