Now, Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?
#1
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Resolution - Lean, was: Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?
I've been helping, remotely, an '87 Auto owner sort out his failing-emissions issues. I finally got to actually look at the car this morning. On of the things I wanted to check was fuel pressure.
With my trusty FP gauge on a drilled and threaded cap nut ready to go, I cracked the fuel rail test port nut. Now, I've done this quite a few times, so, I thought I knew what to expect. But, rather than the quick splooge of fuel followed by a steady but short flow of fuel from the rail, I swear we got pressurized air coming out of the rail. You could hear air escaping from the slightly cracked-open nut along with a pressurized spray of fuel.
So, the question is - how exactly could the fuel rail get pressurized air in it? There were no evident fuel leaks front or rear.
I do have one clue that I will hold-off on for a little bit, so as to not bias any from-whole-cloth diagnoses.
Rennlist immortality awaits the first response with a logical fault analysis.
With my trusty FP gauge on a drilled and threaded cap nut ready to go, I cracked the fuel rail test port nut. Now, I've done this quite a few times, so, I thought I knew what to expect. But, rather than the quick splooge of fuel followed by a steady but short flow of fuel from the rail, I swear we got pressurized air coming out of the rail. You could hear air escaping from the slightly cracked-open nut along with a pressurized spray of fuel.
So, the question is - how exactly could the fuel rail get pressurized air in it? There were no evident fuel leaks front or rear.
I do have one clue that I will hold-off on for a little bit, so as to not bias any from-whole-cloth diagnoses.
Rennlist immortality awaits the first response with a logical fault analysis.
Last edited by worf928; 03-28-2007 at 01:41 PM.
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Good guess Paul. Might be plausible. But this car didn't run out of fuel and had been driven for three hours on the highway just prior to cracking the rail nut. You would expect any air to get returned to the fuel tank after a while, right? Seems like something had to be continuously feeding air into the system...
#4
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
A few more facts: fuel regulator and dampeners hold vacuum.
#5
Rennlist Member
In tank pump has failed or is partially blocking the suction - and the primary pump is doing its best to keep up: in doing so, is sucking some air into its suction due to a porous/failing tank outlet hose ....
This could be compounded if the carbon cannister system is plugged .... and the fuel tank would end up slightly sub-atmospheric ....
This could be compounded if the carbon cannister system is plugged .... and the fuel tank would end up slightly sub-atmospheric ....
#6
Rennlist Member
Is it feasible that air was intorduced into the system at one point and like the brake system has to be bled out? If so can you do a volume check of the gas thats being pumped now that you have the fuel system open?
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by Garth S
In tank pump has failed or is partially blocking the suction - and the primary pump is doing its best to keep up: in doing so, is sucking some air into its suction due to a porous/failing tank outlet hose ....
This could be compounded if the carbon cannister system is plugged .... and the fuel tank would end up slightly sub-atmospheric ....
This could be compounded if the carbon cannister system is plugged .... and the fuel tank would end up slightly sub-atmospheric ....
But, you are close-enough to the one clue I have:
The vacuum line to the fuel evaporation valve (black valve next to the coolant reservoir) was not connected to the valve.
So, with no in-tank pump on '87s and no vacuum to the fuel evap valve what is the mechanism by which the rails pressurize with air (and fuel?).
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
Is it feasible that air was intorduced into the system at one point and like the brake system has to be bled out?
If everything is working properly - and if I understand the general operation correctly - the fuel vapor system draws air from the throttle-body and oil filler neck to add air back into the fuel tank via the canister to replace the volume of fuel used by the injectors so as to keep the tank from getting sucked into a tight ball by the fuel pump as fuel is used up.
The LH sends the electric valve near the crossover (connected to the double-y hose that goes to the t-body and neck) a pulsed signal that is dependent on engine load to meter the return air volume.
Or am I missing something here? Like what the vacuum-operated valve does?
#9
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by Sterling
fuel return line blocked
#10
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by Garth S
... in doing so, is sucking some air into its suction due to a porous/failing tank outlet hose ....
#11
Rennlist Member
Thats an independant system. leaks in the diaphram could cause fuel to leak out , but not air to go in.
mk
mk
Originally Posted by worf928
A few more facts: fuel regulator and dampeners hold vacuum.
#12
Rennlist Member
Hello Dave
It's difficult to work out how the tank venting could affect the fuel within the fuel lines themselves.
You could open the return pipe to the fuel tank and see if there is air there.....
If the feed to the pump is partially blocked, could this cause cavitation ?
It's difficult to work out how the tank venting could affect the fuel within the fuel lines themselves.
You could open the return pipe to the fuel tank and see if there is air there.....
If the feed to the pump is partially blocked, could this cause cavitation ?
#13
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
One other clue: Above I said we were chasing emissions. The car has super low HC and CO and super-high NOx - with new 02 sensor, new high-flow cats (and no airpump connected to them) No intake leaks that I can find. Engine bay is one of the cleanest I've seen.
The engine is not running really hot, seems pretty normal ~190 degree 'elbow' temp.
Yet, the emissions numbers point to a very lean a/f ratio.
The engine is not running really hot, seems pretty normal ~190 degree 'elbow' temp.
Yet, the emissions numbers point to a very lean a/f ratio.
#14
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes
on
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by John Speake
If the feed to the pump is partially blocked, could this cause cavitation ?