Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

The interference engine.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #16  
Cheburator's Avatar
Cheburator
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 77
From: London, UK
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
AFAIK, all 32V are interferance,
all 16V are not,
I say all 16V as I have a 1985 euro S2 and when I did the timing belt service noone could tell me if it was interference or not, so with the belt off and the cams at TDC I manually very slowely turned the crank over, there was NO interferance, so I moved the cams 180 deg tried again no issues, cams back to TDC and still no issues. Once I completed the timing belt service which included all seals, as well as the dual distributor belt the engine fired up on first revolution and ran flawlessly.

and with the comment on the engines which have the 45 dg mark, I think that says only 32V engines again.
Hmm, that's not what happened to my euro S2 5spd when travelling at 120mph... The belt snapped and as a result I had 4 bent valves... Low mileage engine, with no build up at all...

Alex

1990 928 GT
1984 928 S2 5spd (GTS tranny)
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #17  
Lizard928's Avatar
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,601
Likes: 39
From: Abbotsford B.C.
Default

I have no idea what the deal is then, but I know what my results are/were,
the car in question is a 1985 Euro S2 with the dual distributors, and from what I can tell there is nothing to say that the engine has ever been opened up. The car was picked up from the show room floor in germany by an american drove it to the boat, flew back to the us and privately imported it. It came from the 2nd owner who lived in ohio. It was a high mileage car though 272,000 or so miles on it.
But I did confirm that nothing touched. I am not going to say that spinning at a high RPM they wouldnt touch as there may be alittle valve float on that high of mileage.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #18  
Scott M.'s Avatar
Scott M.
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
From: Penn State
Default

Some of my observations, for data points purpose only:

79 5 spd 60k miles, broken belt: no valve damage
85 auto seized h20 pump, stripped 12 teeth off belt at 70 mph, NO valve damage.
86.5 auto 143k miles seized h20 pump circa 140 mph, stripped 8 teeth, 30 bent valves.
88 951 oil soaked/aged belt, stripped teeth, no valve damage.

YMMV
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #19  
H2's Avatar
H2
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,011
Likes: 51
From: Northwest
Default

I'm beginning to think that no one really knows for absolute sure the answer to this question. Too many variations.

H2
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #20  
rhys's Avatar
rhys
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: NJ, Czech Republic, Russia
Default

What this thread has told me is that everyone has an opinion, some quite adamant ones, and no one knows anything at all. Most disappointing!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #21  
Dennis Wilson's Avatar
Dennis Wilson
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 3
From: Owasso, OK
Default

Originally Posted by rhys
What this thread has told me is that everyone has an opinion, some quite adamant ones, and no one knows anything at all. Most disappointing!
Have you checked the archives or read the workshop manual? If you had, you might have learned that the 16 valve engines left the factory as noninterference but overmachining of the heads and/or carbon build up has made them intereference. The workshop manual has special timing belt change procedures for the interference engines. BTW interference means that the valves MAY be bent if the timing belt breaks but this depends on the cam location WHEN it breaks.

If you were wanting a yes or no answer, I'm sorry, there isn't one. The users were just trying to sum up the exceptions. Too bad you didn't read it that way.

Dennis
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #22  
SharkSkin's Avatar
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 8
From: Boulder Creek, CA
Default

Originally Posted by rhys
What this thread has told me is that everyone has an opinion, some quite adamant ones, and no one knows anything at all. Most disappointing!
Same conclusion as last time this came up.

I for one didn't take any chances and changed my TB right away.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #23  
H2's Avatar
H2
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,011
Likes: 51
From: Northwest
Default

Yes, I've thought about buying a non-interference car....but not sure which is which. If they all have the potential (carbon, etc.) I'll stick with the higher HP newer 928s.

Harvey
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #24  
k1woods's Avatar
k1woods
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Covington, GA
Default

I'll add my 84 Euro experience for the record. I had a bent valve as the result of a passenger side cam tip failure. Just 1 valve "slightly" bent - though thats all it takes to lose compression in a cylinder. The bent valve makes a nice desk paperweight.

- Kevin 84 S2
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:33 AM.