Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Crank Scraper/Windage Tray at Road America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2006, 03:47 PM
  #106  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
This update is great. I do not see the non-grated rim that I saw in a previous picture on your website - are you not using the rim any longer?
I think you mean the original sump cover for the older cars. That's removed now in place of the Al plate cover which has the screen cover over it.

Originally Posted by BrendanC
What parts should I send back to you Kevin so you can change this to the new drain design?
The original channels aren't convertable to the new design so I'd think nothing goes back.

Originally Posted by BrendanC
While the pan hanges very very low as it is, what about taking the pan and simply extending the lower portion even lower? Just box-welding an additional inch or so, and of course adding the additional tubing to the pickup?

That would keep more oil in the pan under cornering, right? And the oil level, (I know this part has been discussed) indeed would be farther way.
Right, it would. I thought about that but with the low placement of the pan already I'm leery about going further down.

I should have added that I went back to the OEM gasket from the thin aftermarket version. That gain a mm or two.

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Of course, all that welding, you may as well make a dry sump panand system, I guess.
Yep. Still trying to avoid a $2k, or more, plunge.
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 03:54 PM
  #107  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
I think you mean the original sump cover for the older cars. That's removed now in place of the Al plate cover which has the screen cover over it.
Can you repost a picture of that Glen? I made one similar, but went very close to the pickup circumfrence.
BC is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 04:38 PM
  #108  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Can you repost a picture of that Glen? I made one similar, but went very close to the pickup circumfrence.
Brendan,

Is it the one at the bottom of this page?
http://home.earthlink.net/~bigdadglen/carpics/id10.html

Otherwise I'm not sure what you're looking for.
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 04:58 PM
  #109  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Glen - is that screen? or
BC is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 04:59 PM
  #110  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Oh, so you are not using the thicker-banded one?

BC is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 05:30 PM
  #111  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Brendan,

The screen version on that link is stock for early cars.

I should have taken a pic of the ones Kevin sent. The lower piece is just a flat plate with no screen. Looks like the part on the left without the screen. (Maybe it is?) On top of that is mounted the screen cover. There are stacks of washers holding it up about 3/8".
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 05:45 PM
  #112  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Oh, so with the washers, you are not keeping the overhang that represents the metal band from actually not letting the oil out the sides? Did you follow that - what I said, I can't think of a better way of saying it.

Here is a better version - with the spacers, you are not sealing the sides of the band to the pan - thats the plan?
BC is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 06:02 PM
  #113  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

It's a two-layer approach. The lower band part is directly to the pan, then there are washers, then there's the screen top. The oil is retained in the pan by the bottom plate-with-hole.
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 06:43 PM
  #114  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
It's a two-layer approach. The lower band part is directly to the pan, then there are washers, then there's the screen top. The oil is retained in the pan by the bottom plate-with-hole.
Its all making sense now. What about the plate that is included with Kevin's system? With the trap door, ect?
BC is offline  
Old 06-05-2006, 09:15 PM
  #115  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Geez, should have taken more pics...

The scrapers themselves are the same. They did not come off the car when putting the new drains on. The new drains just bolt onto the studs that the old drains came off of.

I'm not sure what the the trap door piece looks like so can't make a comparison.
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 02:30 PM
  #116  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
I directly measured a particular angle of repose for three volumes of oil in the sump well itself with no baffling whatsoever. The particular angle measured was the point at which oil in the sump well reached the lip and would thereafter allow oil to flow into the shallow portion of the pan. So, if you had this amount of oil in your sump well and had sufficient acceleration to generate a higher angle of repose than the one listed, oil would begin to flow into the shallow portion of the pan.

4 quarts = ~ 15 degrees
5 quarts = ~ 11.5 degrees
6 quarts = ~ 7.8 degrees
Cripes! Your measurements are about 1 quart _less_ than I was calculating. The oil is just flying out the of pan and into the crank when we're gunning these cars.

Based on this analysis, and my experience last weekend, I think every 928 that is being tracked should have a sump cover installed. It keeps the oil in the sump, around the pick-up and away from the crank.

Oil ejection may be a nuisance symptom in itself but I think it's the iceberg's tip of crank failure.
GlenL is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 05:01 PM
  #117  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

This is a really interesting thread, Mark or anybody who knows why didn't that pan work? Did the engine fail or get trouble? Forgive me if this has already been discussed but with the scrapers there will still be enough oil on the walls for lub and cooling? I was thinking when I do my engine which is getting closer and closer, that I was going to use piston squiters that I have and also my rods have drilled small end oiling, that way with all the oil/windage reduction there still will be plenty of oil around the walls. It is very scary doing R&D with such an expensive motor. As to the motor I have just built and installed in the car would I need to remove the engine to fit the scrapers?

Greg
slate blue is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 08:21 PM
  #118  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Should I contact you personally for the rail updates Kevin? I may not have your address. I purchased the full-boat teflon scraper last...winter... I believe.
BC is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 08:56 PM
  #119  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Great - emailed you.
BC is offline  
Old 06-12-2006, 09:54 PM
  #120  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default I think we are close...

I too think we are very close to a good, tested, package of items that solve both problems.

Kevin has given us Dealership rates, and we will be adding the 928 scrapers to our catalogs for all who track the car the moment we have the final iteration tested and are certain that it works.

It will be very close to what Glen is running now, and even that has been tweeked to make it still better. Kevin has the improved windage tray and scrapers on their way to me, and after I put them in, I have races back at the Milwaukee Mile and other tracks that I ran with scraper design #1, so it will be easy for me to compare it to the new scraper design #2.

Hats off to Kevin J for sticking with it through several design versions and such, even though he has onlyu asked to be compensated the first time. All these other mods and re-fits have been provided to Glen L and myself without additional charge.
Carl Fausett is offline  


Quick Reply: Crank Scraper/Windage Tray at Road America



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:38 AM.