Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rear cross member torque values?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2006, 11:47 AM
  #1  
deliriousga
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
deliriousga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA!!!
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rear cross member torque values?

I'm putting in new swaybars and I can't find the torque for the rear cross member to the body in the FSMs. The crossmember I'm talking about is the one the tranny sits on. I need the torque values for the two bolts that are underneath holding the cross membe to the body and also for the four bolts (two on each side) that are in the wheel well.

Anybody know what they are?

TIA!
Old 01-29-2006, 01:45 AM
  #2  
deliriousga
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
deliriousga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA!!!
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the help.
Old 01-23-2010, 11:03 PM
  #3  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,634
Received 2,810 Likes on 1,369 Posts
Default

Could you share what the voices said the torque value was?
Old 01-24-2010, 02:51 PM
  #4  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,188
Received 384 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

Else you could look here:
http://members.rennlist.com/pirtle/s4torque.htm
Old 01-24-2010, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,634
Received 2,810 Likes on 1,369 Posts
Default

Neither the WSM nor Pirtle's site list a specific value for the inboard crossmember-to-body bolt, which is an M12 x 45. They only list a value for the four outboard bolts, which are M10's. I decided to use 63 ft lbs, since many other M12 bolts on the car use this value.
Old 01-24-2010, 03:12 PM
  #6  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,188
Received 384 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

I would think that would be OK too, as the Front Cross member to body 19mm (heads) are 63 ft lbs.
Old 01-24-2010, 03:42 PM
  #7  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 501 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

42-02 has most of the torque specs.
Old 01-24-2010, 04:18 PM
  #8  
borland
Drifting
 
borland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Camarillo, CA, USA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

For the outer bolts:

WSM Vol 4, page 42-02 specifies: "Transverse member to body", M10, ..... Torque: 46 Nm ( 33 ft-lb ).

For the inner M12 bolts....

WSM Vol 3, page 37-123, ".... tighten transmission mounts/cross member bolts with 85 Nm/ 61 ft-lbs. "

Last edited by borland; 08-01-2010 at 02:09 AM.
Old 01-24-2010, 05:58 PM
  #9  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

What we need is someone to crack PDF PET protection so that its possible edit text in them and add all TQ's directly into those files. Life would be so much easier in garage.
Old 01-24-2010, 06:06 PM
  #10  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,634
Received 2,810 Likes on 1,369 Posts
Default

Erkka-

I got a start on making a table of torque values - I'm still collecting values for pre-S4 cars but eventually I'd like to make a spreadsheet of 3 or 4 pages that can be laminated and used in the garage. Or a wall chart, either way. Not there yet, tho:

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...readsheet.html
Old 01-24-2010, 06:13 PM
  #11  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

PET would be logical choice as it doesn't require much knowledge of english language to understand when all needed is pictures and numbers. There has to be some software which can crack PDF protection.
Old 07-31-2010, 09:52 AM
  #12  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
Neither the WSM nor Pirtle's site list a specific value for the inboard crossmember-to-body bolt, which is an M12 x 45. They only list a value for the four outboard bolts, which are M10's. I decided to use 63 ft lbs, since many other M12 bolts on the car use this value.
I ran into this today - those inner cross-member to body bolts with no torque value.

The transmission ones are indeed 61ftlb's, and are also M12, however those are grade 8.8 bolts.

The M12 bolts from the cross member to the body are grade 10.9 - and the generic torque value for them (10.9 zinc plated) is 97 ftlbs, as can be see here in the table at the bottom of page 1.

The quote Borland mentions above I don't read as meaning those bolts.. I think "tighten transmission mounts/crossmember bolts with 85 Nm" on page 37-123 means the bolts between the transmission mounts and cross member, not the ones we have no value for.

Rob - did you ever find a correct factory-stated value for these bolts?
Old 08-01-2010, 02:28 AM
  #13  
borland
Drifting
 
borland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Camarillo, CA, USA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes, you have a good point Hilton, but I think the referenced torque (61 ft-lbs) is still good enough.

I would advise not using that higher torque rating (97 ft-lbs) in your referenced table. The bolt can likely survive that much torque, but the chassis threads may not. With the bolt fully inserted, you may not have as many threads engaged as a standard grade 10.9 nut, thus you could run the risk of stripping the threads in the body.
Old 08-01-2010, 03:07 AM
  #14  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Yep, exactly my fear Borland. Stripping those threads would be a major PITA - I'd have to drop the transmission again to do anything like a timesert or helicoil.

I just can't help wonder why the factory used 10.9 for those two bolts.. but 61 ftlbs is what I'd decided last night to go with. If they work loose or anyone else has found them loosened due to vibration, I'll step it up 10ftlbs and try again.
Old 08-02-2010, 02:06 PM
  #15  
TAREK
Three Wheelin'
 
TAREK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Clearwater Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hilton,
They won't work loose. I've overtorqued these before and it was a PITA to fix


Quick Reply: Rear cross member torque values?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:33 AM.