Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Front main bearing weear and SC applications FYI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2004 | 04:23 PM
  #46  
shaaark89's Avatar
shaaark89
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 1
From: virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
Tom Falkenberg has been racing his 6 liter supercharged Yellow racer . It was originally constructed several years ago by Tilo ,sold to a another, then sold to Tom.
yeah, i get kind of tired of reminding people that the supercharged stroker exists already. it's been a hoot for me. will be interesting to see what others come up with...
Old 12-02-2004 | 05:19 PM
  #47  
bcdavis's Avatar
bcdavis
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Get that car on a dyno...

It would be nice for everyone to see what kind of curves that combination creates...
Old 12-02-2004 | 05:37 PM
  #48  
Joe Dyer's Avatar
Joe Dyer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by GoRideSno
Curtis,
Coged belt = very hard on bearings. Some SC mfgrs will not waranty after cog belt use.

Marc,
What type of SC was it?
What was the position of the belt on the crank pulley?
What is the diameter of the crank pulley?
How is the crank pulley shaped?
What was the tension reading on the belt?
What other accesories were run?

ALL of these must be known before any type of information on this can be called useful.


Andy K
The car Marc refers to is my 93 GTS referred to as the "other white car" in a few past threads. The SC is a T-Trim Vortech. I can't give you pulley diameters, but it was setup for 11 PSI. It only had 3000 miles on it when a repaired cylinder sleeve cracked. It now has a fresh factory block. Marc noticed excessive wear on the front main bearing and was looking to see if anyone has experienced this. The bearing was supposedly new. The belt was slipping at around 4500 rpm, so it was tight, but I wouldn't call it over tight.
Old 12-02-2004 | 06:38 PM
  #49  
BC's Avatar
BC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Likes: 87
Default

So we can assume (correct me) that the bracket was a FAST one. From Munck....
Old 12-02-2004 | 08:33 PM
  #50  
bcdavis's Avatar
bcdavis
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Either FAST, or a Delta-P bracket...

But judging from Andy's comment from Corky Bell,
it sounds like no matter how bad the bracket design,
it shouldn't put too much excessive wear on the crank bearing...
Old 12-02-2004 | 08:49 PM
  #51  
Z's Avatar
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
And Z adds, he has seen sample number THREE with no such wear.
Actually it would be samples number three, four, and five that I'm aware of not having any wear problems like that.

Originally Posted by T_MaX
I hope that in the near future you Stroker and SC guys can find a way to work together as a team and come up with a SC’d Stroker prototype.
Besides the "Tilo car" now owned by Tom Falkenburg, I'm aware of four supercharged "strokers" currently in the works.
Old 12-02-2004 | 08:53 PM
  #52  
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 3
From: Anaheim California
Default

Perhaps if this thread were titled " Front main bearing wear, anyone observed it ? " It would have been interpreted as a quest for knowledge and information. The only fact was there appeared to be unusual wear on the bearing and it had a supercharger. The conclusion that it was the result of the supercharger is where the logic may break down. The experiences of Rob, Z and Corky Bell would seem to indicate that the original theory is in fact far more likely incorrect. Certainly it is something to keep in mind but requires that you completely tear down an engine to check. I wonder how tight the timing belt was since it also pulls "up" ? The expressed surprise that no one else has noticed this simply reinforces how completely committed to a potentially false theory one can become but also implies that it should be expected ! The positive result of this thread is there does NOT appear to be a problem. While I may have presented it rather poorly the point remains most engines now use a single serpentine belt turning th PS ,Alt ,A/C ,smog which loads the crank in only one direction.
Old 12-03-2004 | 12:06 AM
  #53  
Kevin Q's Avatar
Kevin Q
Track Day
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Default Air pump removal

Is the air pump only on US spec cars? If so, then removing the belt surely can't effect the front bearing wear as you are merely returning the car to its original configuration.
Old 12-03-2004 | 12:16 AM
  #54  
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 3
From: Anaheim California
Default

Kevin that appears to be the case for the 1987 no cat Euro ROW cars. Also note the belt driven fan on 78-86 changed the direction of the pull on the crank pulley somewhat.
Old 12-03-2004 | 01:04 AM
  #55  
SharkSkin's Avatar
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 6
From: Boulder Creek, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Q
Is the air pump only on US spec cars? If so, then removing the belt surely can't effect the front bearing wear as you are merely returning the car to its original configuration.
IIRC the early cars with no air pump had a tensioner/idler in that location to tension the fan belt -- no net difference in tension on the crank.
Old 12-03-2004 | 01:25 AM
  #56  
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 3
From: Anaheim California
Default

Correct Dave the same belt drives the fan so they used a tension roller which is now like $800 dollars new !!
Old 12-03-2004 | 03:08 AM
  #57  
T_MaX's Avatar
T_MaX
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 2
From: No Turbo, No SC
Default

"Perhaps if this thread were titled " Front main bearing wear, anyone observed it ? " It would have been interpreted as a quest for knowledge and information."

Bailey, how right you are! At times we can all be abit off with our chosen words

I forgot about the old Tilo car. That is a intercooled Vortech SC, yes?

How many differant SC kits are there now and from who?

Fast = Vortech
? = Delta-P
Andy K = Twin Screw

Anyone else?
Old 12-03-2004 | 05:31 AM
  #58  
Bill Ball's Avatar
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,647
Likes: 49
From: Buckeye, AZ
Default

Sorry to ask again, but why do cogged belts destroy bearings more than non-toothed belts?
Old 12-03-2004 | 06:19 AM
  #59  
Z's Avatar
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by T_MaX
How many differant SC kits are there now and from who?

Fast = Vortech
? = Delta-P
Andy K = Twin Screw

Anyone else?

www.Murf928.com = Vortech
www.928motorsports.com = Powerdyne
www.albrex.com = Albrex
Old 12-03-2004 | 12:09 PM
  #60  
GoRideSno's Avatar
GoRideSno
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach, CA>>>>Atlanta,GA
Default

Bill,
Cogged belts can causing a constant jaring on the pullies = constant jaring on the bearings.

There was a fellow at Stbrfst that had a cogged pullied SCed car that actually broke the crank bolt off. Not only was it cogged but the SC drive pulley was positioned beyond the alternator pulley by a few inches, near the radiator. The pulley was even cast. IIRC it was a Koning car. If this car has not had a front crank bearing failure then I can't imagine that any SCed car will.

HTH,
Andy K


Quick Reply: Front main bearing weear and SC applications FYI



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:37 PM.