Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Should the Idle Control Valve close air-tight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2020, 07:30 AM
  #1  
cschou
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
cschou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Should the Idle Control Valve close air-tight?

Hi all,

Should the Idle control/stabalizer valve on an '89 S4 be air-tight when closed? Mine is not. It rotates perfectly, no sticking AT ALL, but when in the closed position it kind of over-rotates past the point where it seals tight, and as a result I can fairly easy blow air through it. Is this intended by design, or a sign of failure? Car idles fine and steady. But I have the intake out to fix a leaking/sweating oil-filler-neck, and thought I would inspect everything in there as well.

Oh, and I need to replace the rubber mounts holding the ICV. Read somewhere that there might be a VW alternative. Anyone got a part number for those?

Thanks
/Casper
Old 04-27-2020, 07:40 AM
  #2  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,814
Received 718 Likes on 575 Posts
Default

The idle control valve when in the power off position has a default airway designed to flow enough air to support a stable idle without the ac operational. Thus if the ICV fails there will be an idle when hot. If a fail condition occurs and there is a cold start the throttle has to be fethered until the motor warms up.
Old 04-27-2020, 10:33 AM
  #3  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,442
Received 1,609 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cschou
Should the Idle control/stabalizer valve on an '89 S4 be air-tight when closed?
No.
Old 04-27-2020, 11:07 AM
  #4  
cschou
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
cschou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fred and Dave, thanks for the quick replies. In that case, I suppose mine is OK then. I will check with power from a 9V battery and if it works fine, I will reinstall it.
Old 04-27-2020, 01:28 PM
  #5  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,148
Received 387 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
The idle control valve when in the power off position has a default airway designed to flow enough air to support a stable idle without the ac operational. Thus if the ICV fails there will be an idle when hot. If a fail condition occurs and there is a cold start the throttle has to be fethered until the motor warms up.
IIRC, I lifted this from a Mercedes forum but the operation is the same as S4-up 928. The armature rotates around to the running position. It is spring closed requiring only open pulses from the LH.

(This design is simpler than the S3 ICV which requires open and close pulses and uses a throttle body bypass for idle airflow.)

Old 04-27-2020, 02:17 PM
  #6  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,814
Received 718 Likes on 575 Posts
Default

Ken,

I have no idea about the MB unit but the S4 ISV is pulse width modulated and for sure features a spring to close. When closed as in no signal the thing passes enough air to support a warm idle. Given it is pulse width modulated it uses high speed switching to simulate an analogue voltage output, Given this is a modulating control loop there has to be voltages where the air supply is reduced or cut off completely to modulate a situation where the rpms are running high and this is what we see as the shuttle is manually stroked- at part travel it appears to shut off completely. If that position is 4 volts that would make sense. Then when the thing shuts down or fails, the voltage collapses and the shuttle comes to rest with the default opening I advised about in the earlier post.

I have never actually tested the thing with different voltages but presumably from what you are saying that means if one were to load the terminals with different DC voltages the shuttle would move to different fixed postions as per the photos shown. I have always assumed the thing only opens full whack when a direct voltage is applied that is sufficent to drive it such as a 9 volt battery for test purposes. Must pull my spare ISV and play around a bit
Old 04-27-2020, 02:31 PM
  #7  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,148
Received 387 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

Fred,

The S4-up unit requires a minimum pulsed on-time to maintain the closed '4 Volts' position ramping up to the '5 Volts' or higher warm-cold idle range.

Anything below the closed threshold is the fail-safe position.
Old 04-27-2020, 02:53 PM
  #8  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,814
Received 718 Likes on 575 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
Fred,

The S4-up unit requires a minimum pulsed on-time to maintain the closed '4 Volts' position ramping up to the '5 Volts' or higher warm-cold idle range.

Anything below the closed threshold is the fail-safe position.
Ken,

That makes sense.
Old 04-27-2020, 04:40 PM
  #9  
cschou
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
cschou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
IIRC, I lifted this from a Mercedes forum but the operation is the same as S4-up 928. The armature rotates around to the running position. It is spring closed requiring only open pulses from the LH.

(This design is simpler than the S3 ICV which requires open and close pulses and uses a throttle body bypass for idle airflow.)

Ken, thanks a lot. This is exactly the small gap I am seeing at "closed" (well, with power off). Makes sense that the unit has a fail-safe.



Quick Reply: Should the Idle Control Valve close air-tight?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:36 AM.