Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Power mods: HP/Torque v. 0 to 60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2019, 09:00 AM
  #16  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,703
Received 666 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by merchauser
fred, your timing is incredible! last night my wife and I couldn't decide what to watch and ended up watching cuckoo's nest!

Well they do say great minds [almost] think alike !!!
Old 07-17-2019, 09:08 AM
  #17  
Bulvot
Burning Brakes
 
Bulvot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,143
Received 353 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Your question seems to boil down to: What 0-60 performance improvement can you expect if you install a cross pipe and do some shark tuning. Is that accurate?

The answer will be in the tenths of a second. Between 0.1 to 0.5, all other things being equal and you being consistent with your launches. You can use 0-60 calculators to give you some offline comparative analysis of different power levels, but they will just be rough ball parks.

If you want more than that, you need to add serious power, which it sounds like isn't in your plans. Every second faster in 0-60 times requires a geometric progression in power. Not to mention gearing, traction and weight distribution. Turbo Todd's work on his car is a really good insight into what it takes to improve the acceleration of the 928.

You might want to consider a smart phone application to track your 0-60 times before and after your modifications. In the following thread, I documented what I selected: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...on-timers.html

In short, I like Torque Pro for quick and dirty in motion numbers and last 0-60 time. For more data and accuracy, I really like PerfExpert. Paired with a high speed GPS unit like the Garmin GLO, it has proven to be very consistent. Consistency is most important to me since I'm just tracking the changes to my own car.

If you go with PerfExpert and want all the numbers to plug into it (coefficient of friction, gear ratios, etc), let me know and I can share what I came up with.
Old 07-17-2019, 10:47 AM
  #18  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,300
Received 6,161 Likes on 3,926 Posts
Default

When I bought my 79 and supercharged it, the most disappointing part of driving it was that I had this 350 HP engine that wasn't fast because of the manual transmission. That's when I decided to have 928MS install a C5 z06 6-speed and that completely changed the drive and experience with the car. Being able to snap through the gears under hard acceleration with the carbon synchros now let's me utilize the power form the supercharged motor.

As Hacker says, the fastest 928s are forced induction with automatic transmissions as the 5-speed manuals are the restriction to what the car can do.
Old 07-17-2019, 12:18 PM
  #19  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bulvot
...
You might want to consider a smart phone application to track your 0-60 times before and after your modifications. In the following thread, I documented what I selected: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...on-timers.html

In short, I like Torque Pro for quick and dirty in motion numbers and last 0-60 time. For more data and accuracy, I really like PerfExpert. Paired with a high speed GPS unit like the Garmin GLO, it has proven to be very consistent. Consistency is most important to me since I'm just tracking the changes to my own car.

If you go with PerfExpert and want all the numbers to plug into it (coefficient of friction, gear ratios, etc), let me know and I can share what I came up with.
Excellent suggestion, particularly something like PerfExpert which can plot torque/hp versus RPM. One of the challenges with tuning is finding the optimum fuel and ignition timing for each cell. There are some rules of thumb, but being able to do better/worse experiments for each cell would be a real advantage. And a heck of a lot cheaper than buying your own dyno...
Old 07-17-2019, 04:31 PM
  #20  
Bulvot
Burning Brakes
 
Bulvot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,143
Received 353 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Another application to consider for the original poster's purposes is "Speed Logic". They have a free version (aka "Lite") and a paid version (aka "Pro"). The free version has an acceleration timer that has lots of preset options for 0-X speed. But, what I really like, is that you can create a custom timer that starts and stops at any speed that you want. For a manual transmission, like mine, that means I can do a rolling start instead of hammering the clutch, and stop the timer at the end of my gear rather than introduce shifting into the equation. Which is ideal for my purposes of just seeing how my modifications are affecting acceleration over a specific RPM range.

For your 0-60 tests, the application might be ideal.
Old 07-17-2019, 05:45 PM
  #21  
merchauser
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
merchauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,799
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bulvot
Your question seems to boil down to: What 0-60 performance improvement can you expect if you install a cross pipe and do some shark tuning. Is that accurate?

.
Exactly! and thanks to everyone for all the useful information.

I am fully aware of what my GT is, and what it isn't. just looking forward to a few (reversible) mods to have a little more fun, and curious about how that translates in "feel." while I would like to emulate some of the incredible builds on this forum, I have too many other projects going on to sell the GT and start over. I am content and more than satisfied with this car.

I grew up with small block chevys, and then a variety of 911's with 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7 engines. there was an infinite number of parts available to personalize performance. most were pretty simple with immediate results its not like that with the 928. I have noticed a huge difference just doing the maintenance that hadn't been done; an X pipe and ST2 will certainly be icing on a great cake.
Old 07-18-2019, 12:20 AM
  #22  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,826
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by merchauser
; an X pipe and ST2 will certainly be icing on a great cake.
Er,,, I'm not sure if you read it in the thread above, but those things are going to net you exactly the square root of bupkis in terms of accel.

The folks on here with real stories to tell of 0-60 improvement are talking blowers, turbos, drag slicks, weight shedding, weight transfer, change trans to auto, etc.

Ok, so I was a little flip to start. But - seriously, why not just get a roller chassis and do it right. You have history with SBCs, so go what you know. Make a real 928 F&F fart can killer.
Old 07-18-2019, 01:22 AM
  #23  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,703
Received 666 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docmirror

TMake a real 928 F&F fart can killer.
Old 07-18-2019, 05:40 AM
  #24  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Multiple supercharged 928's have posted 0-60 times in the low 4's or just under 4 seconds. The fastest ones are usually automatics though, as pointed out above the 928 manual isn't conducive to fast shifting for 0-60 times.

Then you have Todd's car:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ip-update.html

Don't let anyone tell you a 928 cannot be a rocket in a straight line, all it takes is money to make more horsepower. How much do you wanna spend?

If I ever find some free time my 87 is the next car to receive a Murf928 Supercharger. Todd, Tim, Mike and I have some ideas we've been meaning to test to improve the existing setup.

Sure we could all buy Corvette's, then you'd just have another Corvette. I'd rather have a really fast 928.
I've spent enough on 928's over the past 25 years I could have a very nice late model Ferrari in the garage instead. I'd rather have my 928's.
Hacker, are the Murf Supercharger kits still around? Can one order a kit?
Åke
Old 07-18-2019, 05:46 AM
  #25  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by merchauser
perhaps the beginning of a rabbit hole...….

I enjoy reading about the modifications that are done to increase performance. from minor to major, they are varied, educational, inspirational, and amazing. the HP and torque increases, often verified by dyno tests are impressive. the reports show tremendous HP and torque increases, but my curiosity extends to zero to 60 times, and acceleration. (that's my vice)

I am near the end of required maintenance, and the beginning of power mods, which will be quite modest. next step is X pipe, and then sharktuning. can these modifications be discussed in acceleration terms? for instance, what second gains might be obtained by adding an X pipe? and then by sharktuning? I would be happy to add a second, and giddy if it were more. (if it wasn't a GT, I would be inclined be more aggressive)
Paul, it is actually more interesting to know what the car can do between 60 to 120. It tells you a lot more of how much power you have.
Åke
Old 07-18-2019, 06:18 AM
  #26  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Multiple supercharged 928's have posted 0-60 times in the low 4's or just under 4 seconds. The fastest ones are usually automatics though, as pointed out above the 928 manual isn't conducive to fast shifting for 0-60 times.

Then you have Todd's car:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ip-update.html

Don't let anyone tell you a 928 cannot be a rocket in a straight line, all it takes is money to make more horsepower. How much do you wanna spend?

If I ever find some free time my 87 is the next car to receive a Murf928 Supercharger. Todd, Tim, Mike and I have some ideas we've been meaning to test to improve the existing setup.

Sure we could all buy Corvette's, then you'd just have another Corvette. I'd rather have a really fast 928.
I've spent enough on 928's over the past 25 years I could have a very nice late model Ferrari in the garage instead. I'd rather have my 928's.
Somebody should sell a (thoroughly tested) kit for making the 928 S4 automatic transmission take off as fast as possible from standing stop while still maintaining reasonable street drivability. I've demonstrated my ignorance of transmissions in other threads, but higher flash stall speed might help acceleration, as well as shorter rear end. Add some reliability improvements, including extra auxiliary cooling, for high power, and I think one might have something for the modern world that is all about accelerating from one traffic jam to another going thru a traffic light, stop sign, and a radar trap.
Old 07-18-2019, 12:05 PM
  #27  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Alright, I'll play.

Here is the secret to a real fast 0-60 car......TRANSMISSION. Period, end.

Let's use my McLaren 12c and 570 as examples. Both cars are regularly tested on Youtube, etc at being 2.X second zero to 60. Both are 10 second cars, STOCK.

My 12c weighs about 2850# dry and makes 616 HP. Lots of 928s have 616 HP, many are on this board. Yet none of them, not even Todd's car, even come close to a mid 2 second 0-60 pass.

The 12c has "just OK" traction control, nothing fancy.

But the transmission is out of this world. The 7 speed Ricardo double clutch trans shifts in like 20 milliseconds, and there is NO perceptible pause in acceleration, it just feels like the car will keep accelerating forever. For every instantaneous shift, you gain a couple car lengths over a manually shifted car or a conventional automatic.

Without a trans like this, it doesn't even matter how much power you have.

Consider that my stock 12C with the radio blasting and air conditioning on will post times that are as good as or better than Todd's car, which is a full on race car practically speaking.

Modded McLarens are easy to do, and they are low 9 second cars....

100% transmission, that's why they are so fast. You quest for more power is somewhat fruitless because you can have 1000 HP and still not be a fast accelerating car with the transmissions that are available to a 928.
Old 07-18-2019, 02:37 PM
  #28  
vanster
Rennlist Member
 
vanster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oakland CA
Posts: 2,325
Received 177 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

I find that with everyday driving it's the 30 to 70mph that is important not 0 to 60. With a 6.5 stroked motor I can easily spin the tires in 1st and jump up against the limiter. To me torque is the most fun I have about 440# of it.
The following 2 users liked this post by vanster:
dr bob (07-18-2019), ptuomov (07-18-2019)
Old 07-18-2019, 02:57 PM
  #29  
merchauser
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
merchauser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,799
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vanster
I find that with everyday driving it's the 30 to 70mph that is important not 0 to 60. With a 6.5 stroked motor I can easily spin the tires in 1st and jump up against the limiter. To me torque is the most fun I have about 440# of it.
well said...agreed. your motor is a beast. you must be the envy of every 928 gathering you attend.
Old 07-18-2019, 06:26 PM
  #30  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vanster
I find that with everyday driving it's the 30 to 70mph that is important not 0 to 60. With a 6.5 stroked motor I can easily spin the tires in 1st and jump up against the limiter. To me torque is the most fun I have about 440# of it.
It must be a sweet engine for a street car with the smaller intake ports, longer intake runners, two Helmholtz tuning peaks, smaller exhaust ports and header primary runners, bigger cams, and 30% more displacement than the stock S4. I haven’t driven your car or seen a dyno graph, but logic dictates that, when the engine rpms approach the power band, there’s a wall of torque.



Quick Reply: Power mods: HP/Torque v. 0 to 60?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:10 AM.