Blown/Damaged Head Gasket?
Rennlist Member

So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point.
Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale

and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item.
That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there.
Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD.
So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point.
Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale

and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item.
That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there.
Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD.
You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston.
There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect.
BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly.
Rennlist Member

You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston.
There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect.
BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly.
Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly?
Rennlist Member

Looking at the record - no other Fuel Injection system spanned as many years as K-Jet, and through many Government regs and changes. And remember that in the case of the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo (the 930) - the car that Porsche used to get back the moniker of "worlds fastest production car" from Ferrari - they chose K-Jet. Think about that. The year was 1988/89, and Porsche certainly had access to the Bosch LH-Jetronic system, but they opted for K-Jetronic for their Ferrari beater. I like it.
Wasn't that a 930 in the movie Bad Boys II? Worlds fastest production car. A K-Jet was in that car.

There's your 911 trivia for tonight
http://www.type17.ch/downloads/Injec...p%20Manual.pdf
System pressure of 145psi is ridiculously high, it should be somewhere around 75psi, see pages 35 and 45
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly?
Good luck,
Dave
Rennlist Member

As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet.
FD
A - connected to WUR
B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
D - connected to WUR
WUR
1 - connected to FD
2 - connected to FD
On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature.
Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work?
Thanks.
As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet.
FD
A - connected to WUR
B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
D - connected to WUR
WUR
1 - connected to FD
2 - connected to FD
On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature.
Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work?
Thanks.
Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall
If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue.
However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things!
The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines.
Rennlist Member

Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall
If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue.
Thanks.
Rennlist Member

However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things!
The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines.
Here they are on the old motor color coded before removal.
and here's the K-Jet system after removal where you can see the end connectors being different from each other.









