Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Festival of Speed at Cal Speedway /Auto Club Speedway April 20 2018 - 928s running?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2018, 03:36 PM
  #331  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
This, I think, is key:


In fact it seems to me that pre-ignition would almost certainly lead to detonation, just as dialing in extra 10-deg of ignition advance would almost certainly lead to detonation. And of course the limit on ignition advance is octane, pressure, and temperature. All are variables to a degree (octane varies, altitude effects combustion pressure, track temp determines intake air temp, etc) so the trick is developing a tune that is safe in worst-case conditions. Of course the EZK for 87+ cars) detects knocks and pulls timing as needed, within limits. And Sharktuner of course monitors and logs that, which is an excellent gauge for that safety margin.

So here's a crazy idea: Take along a Sharktuner for at least the practice laps, and find out for sure if the engine is safe for that day's conditions, fuel, etc. And if it isn't, then fix it. It's simple and stupid-cheap compared to risking an engine.
For our 928 S4 car engines run on pump gas, I think it is indeed highly likely that pre-ignition cycles develop to also knock cycles, especially at full load and lower rpms. In effect, the low fuel octane can act as an early warning mechanism with knock sensing, at least as long as someone is actively looking at knock counts. The one caveat is that if the pre-ignition induced knock happens during the TDC window, then many knock sensing systems ignore it as there’s too much piston slap noise that would otherwise confuse the knock detection logic. I don’t know how EZK windows is listening interval as a function of crank angle.

For aero piston engines, the margins of safety are so large that preignition doesn’t automatically cause knock on aviation fuel. So that’s why they have to detect pre-ignition from the CHT and EGT moving in opposite directions.
Old 07-27-2018, 04:04 PM
  #332  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Just suppose, for an instant, that the first engine failed from detonation, as one of the two choices that Carrillo suggested.
I wouldn't want to take the aftermarket performance parts supplier completely at face value when there's an engine failure. They are conflicted. Even if they had supplied a rod made of balsa wood and the rod had burned into ashes inside the engine, they'd still come back with either irregular combustion or excessive engine speed.

The pictures are as informative and much less conflicted, in my opinion.
Old 07-27-2018, 04:07 PM
  #333  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

10 years ago Todd told us that detonation causes a piston to handle 10 times the normal power of that hole. 91 octane is below the minimum on many current production cars, and therefore causes them to retard it from optimal tables. This is not new, and this is not conjecture.
Old 07-27-2018, 04:09 PM
  #334  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
10 years ago Todd told us that detonation causes a piston to handle 10 times the normal power of that hole. 91 octane is below the minimum on many current production cars, and therefore causes them to retard it from optimal tables. This is not new, and this is not conjecture.
How did he measure that cylinder pressure? I wonder, since you say that's not conjecture, I assume it was measured?

I can tell you from experience that fitting a cylinder pressure sensor integrated to the spark plug into the 928 S4 head and valve cover is not easy. Whether or not you go ALL GHETTO with the wires.

Or perhaps you're not familiar with what the word "conjecture" means.
Old 07-27-2018, 05:22 PM
  #335  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
I wouldn't want to take the aftermarket performance parts supplier completely at face value when there's an engine failure. They are conflicted. Even if they had supplied a rod made of balsa wood and the rod had burned into ashes inside the engine, they'd still come back with either irregular combustion or excessive engine speed.

The pictures are as informative and much less conflicted, in my opinion.
Not much left of either of the broken rods, from either engine (actually, there were more pieces of the first failed rod than this one.)

If there wasn't this amazing crack in #2 rod (I have not removed any others to see if they are also cracked), I would never had a real clue that the pounding that occurred was so severe. And it is quite a stretch for me to think that the worst cracked and damaged piston (still attached to the crankshaft) just happens to have had a defective Carrillo rod attached to it.....that would be silly, in my opinion.

I've found the engineering department at Carrillo to be an incredible resource....they have always seemed to be as interested in figuring out what failed as I have been.



However, if I was using Scat or Eagle rods, made in China, I'd "hear" your point better.
Old 07-27-2018, 06:15 PM
  #336  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
How did he measure that cylinder pressure? I wonder, since you say that's not conjecture, I assume it was measured?

I can tell you from experience that fitting a cylinder pressure sensor integrated to the spark plug into the 928 S4 head and valve cover is not easy. Whether or not you go ALL GHETTO with the wires.

Or perhaps you're not familiar with what the word "conjecture" means.
(...)
On an individual basis, destroyed engines require root cause analysts for the failure. So much happens in such a short time, it can be a challenge.
Detonation and pre-ignition breaks (or melts) pistons. Doing much more than a mass-produced family sedan engine using 91 octane is asking for both those events to happen. Many modern vehicles with >11:1 CR are removing timing above 110 degrees IAT, which equates to around 85-90 degrees ambient. Unless its 65 degrees out, you are driving around on a "compromised" table in high CR vehicles.

For the current engine in this thread - 91 octane gas is barely that when tested at random pumps. Controlled combustion looks very different on a piston, on valves, on the dyno, 02 sensors, and on spark plugs than does "uncontrolled" combustion (which encompasses pre-ignition and detonation).

Greg -
I did not catch in the beginning - what ECU is running this engine?

Last edited by dr bob; 07-27-2018 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Thread clean-up
Old 07-27-2018, 06:32 PM
  #337  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

In the old days, when we dumped 87 Octane in a car that was built for 91 Octane, it pinged.....pre-ignition, right?

So, if this engine didn't have enough Octane, it makes complete sense, to me, that this engine had pre-ignition.

Looking at the broken pieces, they also "fit" the description of what happens when there is detonation....severe hammering.

I'm thinking that Tuomo has the best thought pattern regarding what really happened.

Pre-ignition lead to detonation (or they happened simultaneously).....the best of both.
Old 07-27-2018, 06:48 PM
  #338  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I had to laugh while I read this ^^^^^^^.

No matter what Carrillo said about the first failure and what I believe happened, this engine still got run on monkey **** mixed with a splash of race fuel....to "save" a few bucks on real race fuel. (Just suppose, for an instant, that the first engine failed from detonation, as one of the two choices that Carrillo suggested. Now, If 110 octane costs $10 a gallon and one of these engines cost 30K to fix....now much race fuel does that buy? Is that math really so complex that only a rocket scientist can figure that out? And you are going to make a 30K bet that Carrillo and your engine builder are wrong and go ahead and run "the same fuel mix I've always ran" on the second engine?)

And you are suggesting that I should try and convince this particular individual into the expense of converting the fuel system/computer system over to be able to use E85.

That's just plain old funny.....
Laugh away. Then read it again.

Considering how forgiving E85 is in "recreational" race engines, it's getting hard to justify building one these days to run on gasoline. It just takes 2.x the fuel mass to make the power, and let the fuel cool the chambers and pistons along the way. I can think of only one better use for ethanol.
Then tell me what part of that is so funny that it doesn't apply to new "recreational" race engines being built today. Want to pretty much remove the common concerns about melting pistons and hammering rods? Yes it takes a modern engine management package. What's one of your race engines worth these days? Adding a couple $k is relatively cheap insurance. E85 is much more commonly available than race gas, better supporting folks who might drive their cars away from organized events. Justify away!

Old 07-27-2018, 06:55 PM
  #339  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
Laugh away. Then read it again.



Then tell me what part of that is so funny that it doesn't apply to new "recreational" race engines being built today. Want to pretty much remove the common concerns about melting pistons and hammering rods? Yes it takes a modern engine management package. What's one of your race engines worth these days? Adding a couple $k is relatively cheap insurance. E85 is much more commonly available than race gas, better supporting folks who might drive their cars away from organized events. Justify away!
I completely understand the benefits and agree with your train of thought.

I'm just trying to imagine "selling" this idea to a dedicated, total minimalist.....Hell, another $200 worth of race gas would have solved the problem, too!

That's the funny part.
Old 07-27-2018, 07:10 PM
  #340  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC

(....)

On an individual basis, destroyed engines require root cause analysts for the failure. So much happens in such a short time, it can be a challenge.
Detonation and pre-ignition breaks (or melts) pistons. Doing much more than a mass-produced family sedan engine using 91 octane is asking for both those events to happen. Many modern vehicles with >11:1 CR are removing timing above 110 degrees IAT, which equates to around 85-90 degrees ambient. Unless its 65 degrees out, you are driving around on a "compromised" table in high CR vehicles.

For the current engine in this thread - 91 octane gas is barely that when tested at random pumps. Controlled combustion looks very different on a piston, on valves, on the dyno, 02 sensors, and on spark plugs than does "uncontrolled" combustion (which encompasses pre-ignition and detonation).

Greg -
I did not catch in the beginning - what ECU is running this engine?
So the answer is you don’t know what “conjecture” means?


Last edited by dr bob; 07-27-2018 at 08:14 PM. Reason: Thread Clean-Up
Old 07-27-2018, 08:16 PM
  #341  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
(...)
On an individual basis, destroyed engines require root cause analysts for the failure. So much happens in such a short time, it can be a challenge.
Detonation and pre-ignition breaks (or melts) pistons. Doing much more than a mass-produced family sedan engine using 91 octane is asking for both those events to happen. Many modern vehicles with >11:1 CR are removing timing above 110 degrees IAT, which equates to around 85-90 degrees ambient. Unless its 65 degrees out, you are driving around on a "compromised" table in high CR vehicles.

For the current engine in this thread - 91 octane gas is barely that when tested at random pumps. Controlled combustion looks very different on a piston, on valves, on the dyno, 02 sensors, and on spark plugs than does "uncontrolled" combustion (which encompasses pre-ignition and detonation).

Greg -
I did not catch in the beginning - what ECU is running this engine?
Stock Bosch....
Old 07-27-2018, 08:37 PM
  #342  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD

I'm just trying to imagine "selling" this idea to a dedicated, total minimalist.....Hell, another $200 worth of race gas would have solved the problem, too!

Perhaps a showcase with a blackened piston and a split rod, maybe a bit of the viewport from the side of the block would help illustrate the need well enough. For either solution.
Old 07-28-2018, 09:08 PM
  #343  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Here's some pictures of the cracked rod from cylinder #2, with a spray on crack detector. I had to wipe away most of the "developer" off...the cracks are too big and just "bleed" everywhere. Truthfully, I'm amazed that this connecting rod didn't also become multiple pieces.....it certainly could not have been very far behind.


Old 07-28-2018, 09:38 PM
  #344  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 501 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Geezus. Those took a serious pounding.

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Here's some pictures of the cracked rod from cylinder #2, with a spray on crack detector. I had to wipe away most of the "developer" off...the cracks are too big and just "bleed" everywhere. Truthfully, I'm amazed that this connecting rod didn't also become multiple pieces.....it certainly could not have been very far behind.


Old 07-28-2018, 10:13 PM
  #345  
GregBBRD
Former Vendor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,469 Posts
Default

Here's a picture of the top of #2 piston. The dye penetrant didn't work perfectly. There's a crack going almost straight up, from near the upper end of the lower right crack, if you look closely.

Note the "pitting" on the top of the piston. I bead blasted the top of this piston at 20psi, to get rid of the burned on oil.

Note the marks from the piston hitting the cylinder head on the right edge. This piston had "expanded" about .030" and was that far out of the cylinder, hitting the edge of the combustion chamber.

It's really not very often that one gets such great pieces to look at, out of an exploded engine. Most engine failures involve one cylinder and it is sometimes tough to figure out what happened exactly.

I get sent an amazing amount of engine pieces to look at and try to figure out what happened, from all different kinds of engines, from all different people. Somewhere out there, is something written (or someone telling people) to send broken engine pieces to Greg Brown, when no one else can figure out what happened.....

This engine is a "school book" primer on detonation....or pre-ignition....I don't care what you want to call it.


Quick Reply: Festival of Speed at Cal Speedway /Auto Club Speedway April 20 2018 - 928s running?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:06 PM.