Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is there any diffrence between 1987 and 1985 5Y gearbox?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 02:46 AM
  #1  
Duke48
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Duke48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 202
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Is there any diffrence between 1987 and 1985 5Y gearbox?

Hi,
I have 944 (118kw 160hp) produced September 1987 with 5Y transmission. My transmission needs replacement. By mistake seller sent me AGM trans from 944s, i wanted 5Y trans, so he proposed me a 5Y09105 which was found in 1986 model year UK car, i don't like it but i would like to get objective opinion is there any difference between late 5Y and the early from October 1985?

Last edited by Duke48; 07-11-2017 at 06:03 AM.
Old 07-11-2017, 05:52 AM
  #2  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I'd have to check the workshop manual for any minor specific differences, but AFAIK they have the same gearing.

Regardless, it will definitely fit and bolt up properly.

October 1985 should be a "late" version (1986), but get a picture of it to be sure - it should have the black plastic plug for the speedometer pickup. Your car (September 1987 makes it a 1988, no?) needs a "late" transmission. The early ones from 1983-1985.1 don't have the speedometer pickup.

Last edited by FRporscheman; 07-12-2017 at 02:54 AM.
Old 07-11-2017, 10:39 PM
  #3  
Kurt R
Hates Family Guy
Rennlist Member
 
Kurt R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 3,955
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

All 5Y transmissions are the same.
I don't see a AGM transmission, maybe he meant AGP? The ratios on that aren't that different, and would work just fine.

5Y
1st 10:36 (3.600)
2nd 16:34 (2.1250)
3rd 24:35 (1.4583)
4th 28:30 (1.0714)
5th 35:29 (0.8286)
Rev 12:42 (3.500)
FDR 9:35 (3.8889)

AGP
1st 10:35 (3.500)
2nd 17:35 (2.059)
3rd 25:35 (1.400)
4th 29:30 (1.034)
5th 35:29 (0.829)
Rev 12:42 (3.500)
FDR 9:35 (3.889)

Since you have a 5Y and you have access to other 5Y, I take it you're not in North America? Want to sell the 5th gearset from your dead 5Y?
Old 07-12-2017, 01:17 PM
  #4  
KevinGross
Rennlist Member
 
KevinGross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stow, MA, USA
Posts: 1,502
Received 165 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Correct, they are the same ratios, etc. There were minor production differences, some undocumented, but none would affect use. Around 85, Porsche did add a steel scattershield over the end cover (rear aluminum section) for what they termed "crash protection." You can easily swap from your '87 to the earlier gearbox if it's missing: two bolts. Good luck!
Old 07-17-2017, 08:05 AM
  #5  
Duke48
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Duke48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 202
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I bought another 5Y and it is as bad as my previous 5Y it makes knocking noises on neutral when warmed up. No, it's not a torque tube fault.


Is the AGP any stronger than 5Y? On paper ratios don't look that bad, but in the real world, upshift from 4th to 5th at 180kph vs 198kph.

@Kurt R: I am from Poland. Found few other gearboxes but all are problably dead, one even has Torsen LSD mounted.

Last edited by Duke48; 07-17-2017 at 08:26 AM.
Old 07-17-2017, 05:26 PM
  #6  
SloMo228
Rennlist Member
 
SloMo228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As far as I know, the AGP (and other S transaxles) uses the same stronger case as the Turbo and S2 transaxles, but the same weaker ring/pinion as the regular 8-valve transaxle. So, yes, it's stronger than a 5Y but not as strong as a Turbo/S2.

The gearing will probably give slightly better acceleration if you use the AGP transaxle. There's not much reason not to use it if you already have it on hand and it's in good condition.
Old 07-17-2017, 07:28 PM
  #7  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,772
Received 66 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SloMo228
As far as I know, the AGP (and other S transaxles) uses the same stronger case as the Turbo and S2 transaxles, but the same weaker ring/pinion as the regular 8-valve transaxle. So, yes, it's stronger than a 5Y but not as strong as a Turbo/S2.

The gearing will probably give slightly better acceleration if you use the AGP transaxle. There's not much reason not to use it if you already have it on hand and it's in good condition.
Looking at the ratios posted above, wouldn't the S be taller geared? I.E. the torque multiplication values (teeth of driven gear divided by teeth of drive gear) are smaller, but the FDR is the same.
Old 07-17-2017, 07:49 PM
  #8  
KevinGross
Rennlist Member
 
KevinGross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stow, MA, USA
Posts: 1,502
Received 165 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

The 944S ring and pinion are different from that used in the eight-valve normally-aspirated cars (eg, the 5Y version). The pinion shaft is longer, to accommodate the thicker gears common to the S/2/T gearboxes, and the pinion is a bit stronger. That said, the gearing of the 5Y and AGP is almost identical as measured as road speed.




944 eight-valve normally-aspirated stock ratios



944S stock ratios
Old 07-17-2017, 10:24 PM
  #9  
SloMo228
Rennlist Member
 
SloMo228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odonnell
Looking at the ratios posted above, wouldn't the S be taller geared? I.E. the torque multiplication values (teeth of driven gear divided by teeth of drive gear) are smaller, but the FDR is the same.
Whoops, yes, I think you're correct. Had a bit of a brain fart.
Old 07-19-2017, 06:36 AM
  #10  
Duke48
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Duke48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 202
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ok, so APG also rattles but is the most silent out of 3 gearboxes installed on my car in the last 7 days so I leave it for now and go for holidays.

However, APG gearbox makes 944 souless, don't do it, as fast as my 5Y is fixed I'll put it right back where it was, unfortunately it will be at least 3 months. Ratios are worse than on the paper, additionaly I don't get Porsche engineers, why they made all the ratios from 1 to 4 longer and left the 5th the same as in 944 8v. They should leave 1-4 exactly the same and make 5th longer for more pleasent highway drive and top speed.



Quick Reply: Is there any diffrence between 1987 and 1985 5Y gearbox?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:32 PM.