Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Realistically, what's the cost of ownership look like for 924's / 944's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2015, 04:36 AM
  #46  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

why are there two rocks on top of your 968?
Old 05-02-2015, 12:51 PM
  #47  
BoulderGeek
Pro
 
BoulderGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 546
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Otto Mechanic
Maybe. In all honesty 80K/year was light 20 years ago. I suggest a Camry.
Cold blooded.

Where I live, salaries have only gone down in the last 20 years. I was over 100 back then.

And the 2007 Camry just hit us with a $1700 bill. Nothing cheap about those junk boxes.
Old 05-02-2015, 03:56 PM
  #48  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole
When taken care of, they are simply great reliable cars.
I'd go you one better on that analysis; when taken care of they both earn and deserve the title "supercar". Have other's been built since? Yes. Are they cheaper? No. Is that an indictment of value? No.

You can buy a cheaper car on spec these days that will beat a 30 year old supercar, but V996 has already proven a lack of understanding in that areana, this is someone who thinks a NA 1985 911 could ever beat a race prepared NA 928 on a track. It's never going to happen. The suspension is better, the weight distribution is better, the god damned console clock is better

Porsche didn't race the 928 because they were scared. They scared themselves. With the 928.
Old 05-02-2015, 04:17 PM
  #49  
V996
Racer
 
V996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Brockville, ON
Posts: 304
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Otto Mechanic
I'd go you one better on that analysis; when taken care of they both earn and deserve the title "supercar". Have other's been built since? Yes. Are they cheaper? No. Is that an indictment of value? No.

You can buy a cheaper car on spec these days that will beat a 30 year old supercar, but V996 has already proven a lack of understanding in that areana, this is someone who thinks a NA 1985 911 could ever beat a race prepared NA 928 on a track. It's never going to happen. The suspension is better, the weight distribution is better, the god damned console clock is better

Porsche didn't race the 928 because they were scared. They scared themselves. With the 928.
Where did I say that?

And re: reliability, I'll own up to it, some of the older 911s have some major, major issues and the 928 is probably more reliable than those. However they definitely have a lot more things that can go wrong than a 944, especially electrically. They were luxury supercars and will cost a pretty penny to get running again.
Old 05-03-2015, 01:01 AM
  #50  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V996
They were luxury supercars and will cost a pretty penny to get running again.
Never owned one? Perfectly ready to make pronouncements on their cost of ownership? Even capable of assessing their weak points? We're perfect for each other! I've never owned a 911 and never want to (OK, I have a weakness for 930s. I also have a diagnosed death wish).

Go for it. I'm all ears. I'll warn you though that I own two of them, one that I've dissected in vivo and one I've owned since 1986, so be prepared to have bull**** called on you if you slip up

What were those "electrical" problems the 928 doesn't share with the 944 and 924 again?

Last edited by Otto Mechanic; 05-03-2015 at 01:35 AM.
Old 05-03-2015, 01:05 AM
  #51  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V996
Where did I say that?
In my dreams. It was right there between the lines. You didn't see it? Come on, just because we closed down one fascinating debate on the possible value of a 924S doesn't mean we can't have another. I'm a long time dyed in the wool devotee of the 928. You're a heathen 911 lover. Let's do this?

Last edited by Otto Mechanic; 05-03-2015 at 01:28 AM.
Old 05-03-2015, 02:00 AM
  #52  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
after reading the twin turbo 945whp thread on the 928 forum yesterday....
Yeah. Soon Dr. Kuhn will have Bugatti running for the hills

Originally Posted by odurandina
negligence blew up my '87S on Oct 31, 1994.

in any case, here's the mutant with her 6,349 cubic centimeters.

you all don't know this but, the project will soon be going to a whole nuther place.

I'd say more....
But you'd have to kill me. I understand.

Originally Posted by odurandina
but the files are sealed for 75 years.
National secrets and all. How much are they paying you to keep that water fueled carburetor of yours off the market?
Old 05-03-2015, 02:26 AM
  #53  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by morghen
why are there two rocks on top of your 968?
Oscar has to use ballast. No one told him he want's to place it low ...
Old 05-03-2015, 02:45 AM
  #54  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,773
Received 68 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Speaking of high mileage 928s, I drove an 86 with 8xx,xxx miles. The trans was gone, but that thing still sounded good.

To the OP, I think I already posted in this thread, but you can easily see the the wide spectrum of experiences with these cars. The bottom line is that after 3 decades, you are at the mercy of whatever replacement parts were used and the quality of the labor done to install them because very few original parts remain on the cars that have been driven. If you are even asking this question in the first place, an old foreign car in general is a bad idea unless you are handy with a wrench and have free time.
Old 05-04-2015, 06:07 PM
  #55  
Arominus
Race Car
 
Arominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoulderGeek
Damn, just how young are the people here?

I'm just about 48, making 80K with no kids, and I finally think maybe I can afford a used 944.

Whomever told me to go into high tech was wrong.
Priorities lol, 35 here making less than that and i've had 3 so far, trading up to a higher model each time.

Doing your own work saves a lot of money.
Old 05-04-2015, 09:03 PM
  #56  
Otto Mechanic
Rennlist Member
 
Otto Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Paso Robles, CA (Under the lift)
Posts: 2,936
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arominus
Priorities lol, 35 here making less than that and i've had 3 so far, trading up to a higher model each time.
58 here, not making any money at all. Own 3, have owned 5. Each was different, in some ways better and others not.

The first car I ever owned was a 1.7L 914 that soon became a 1.8L after I accidentally downshifted from 4th to 3rd and dumped the clutch during a fun race with a TR7 on Hwy 1 between Santa Cruz and San Francisco back in 1978. Later I put a 2.4L 911S engine in it and built the body and suspension up to 916 specs. I called it my "flexy flier". It was one of the most awesome cars I've ever driven.

By 1986 I'd sold my 914/916 and bought 928 S3. There's no way to improve that car so I've just maintained it. 4 years ago I found another '85 S3 in a swamp in Florida, it's a donor car, someday it may end up on the track...

In 1989 I found a neglected 931 for a song. Six months of restoration and the day I was giving it to my wife, it was destroyed by a drunken lunatic in a Fiat 124 sedan (the Italian answer to the Datsun 510). I will never have any love for Fiats again.

Last year I found a pristine 1989 944 S2 and though I've never driven her, I have great expectations. Someday I hope to own a 1989/90 944 Turbo S. Afer that I intend to die


Originally Posted by Arominus
Doing your own work saves a lot of money.
+1 on that. If you don't work on your own car you don't really own it in my opinion, you lease it from your mechanic

Last edited by Otto Mechanic; 05-04-2015 at 09:18 PM.
Old 05-05-2015, 11:15 AM
  #57  
BoulderGeek
Pro
 
BoulderGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 546
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arominus
Priorities lol, 35 here making less than that and i've had 3 so far, trading up to a higher model each time.

Doing your own work saves a lot of money.
That makes me feel better.


Well, I recovered my steering wheel and installed a new shift boot, so i really think that I am digging in there and making the car my own.

Yesterday, recovering from a nasty five day late season flu, I researched the dreaded rear hatch glass seal delam problem. I have 1mm of air gap under the top edge of the hatch glass, giving a nice ram air (or water) effect. Debating tackling that myself or letting glass pros have a "crack" at it.

Now that I added everything that I have wanted to my XC70 and VFR800, I guess I needed a new project.



Quick Reply: Realistically, what's the cost of ownership look like for 924's / 944's?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:44 PM.