Compression Numbers: How good?
#1
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 36
From: Northern California, '86 951
Compression Numbers: How good?
Compression Test Results: 1986 944 Turbo, 115,000 miles.
148 (cylinder 1, nearest to belts)
151
147
149
How good or bad are these results? I know consistency is good, but should I be getting higher numbers?
I'm not sure what is considered "wet" or "dry" testing, but all I did was put some oil on the threads and o-ring of the testing equipment, and cranked about 8 times each. It's a free rental from O'reilly auto.
Cheers
148 (cylinder 1, nearest to belts)
151
147
149
How good or bad are these results? I know consistency is good, but should I be getting higher numbers?
I'm not sure what is considered "wet" or "dry" testing, but all I did was put some oil on the threads and o-ring of the testing equipment, and cranked about 8 times each. It's a free rental from O'reilly auto.
Cheers
#4
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 36
From: Northern California, '86 951
#6
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 36
From: Northern California, '86 951
Trending Topics
#8
Silly question. Why do leak down test if compression is good? If compression is bad, I get doing the leak down to determine the cause of the compression loss (intake valve, head gasket, rings, etc.). Not sure if I understand why it should be done otherwise.
Not being snarky, just want to understand your thought process.
Not being snarky, just want to understand your thought process.
#9
Bonus, I've never heard of a stock 951 (even with very low mileage or a fresh rebuild even) pulling anything close to 180 psi. A 8:1 comp motor just wont pull those kinds of numbers. Thats more accurate for a very healthy 10.6:1 2.5 liter N/A car. 150-160 is very healthy for a stock turbo motor.
#10
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 36
From: Northern California, '86 951
Thanks doug, I appreciate that info!
Bum, i'm still learning but I think a leak down test differs because it tells not so much about peak pressure generation, but rather about the cylinder's capabilty of maintaining a pressure. Slightly different pieces of info, I guess.
Bum, i'm still learning but I think a leak down test differs because it tells not so much about peak pressure generation, but rather about the cylinder's capabilty of maintaining a pressure. Slightly different pieces of info, I guess.
#11
Silly question. Why do leak down test if compression is good? If compression is bad, I get doing the leak down to determine the cause of the compression loss (intake valve, head gasket, rings, etc.). Not sure if I understand why it should be done otherwise.
Not being snarky, just want to understand your thought process.
Not being snarky, just want to understand your thought process.
For example you might have nice and even compression numbers around the 150 mark across all cylinders but still have a leak down over 20%. Indicates some even wear on all cylinders and that on a fresh rebuild the compression numbers would be higher.
So, a compression test alone just tells you that all the cylinders have worn evenly and that you don't have a bad leak on any one cylinder.