strut brace advice please
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenville New York
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Good day Gents, I have an early '85 NA and it is an exclusively track (DE) car. So after 2 years of DE, I will take the advice of my instructors and install a strut tower brace. I don't need bling or fancy expensive name brand to feel good, just something that works. I could make something like Van has on his cars but if I could find one for a couple hundred bucks, I would buy it, that is if it's not a POS.
I found one from Racing Dynamics for $265 plus s+h. Anything cheaper out there that is a functional unit? Thanks, Kevin.
I found one from Racing Dynamics for $265 plus s+h. Anything cheaper out there that is a functional unit? Thanks, Kevin.
#3
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenville New York
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the reply, thats a great price! I am concerned about the use of hiem joints on their piece. I have been told that hiem joins allow movement so the effectiveness is very diminished. I dont know how true that is so thats why I'm posting the question.
#4
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a Racing Dynamics on my car and while it can be a bit of a pain if I have to take it off to do major work in the engine bay, I like it and it makes a noticeable difference in the cars handling.
The KLA brace would be easier to remove when necessary because the bar is bolted on both ends. While good for removal a pinned connection on both ends also reduces the effectiveness of the brace by allowing both ends to pivot.
The Racing Dynamics bar is fixed to the mounting plate on one side offering more rigidity and I've found I rarely need to remove it. There have been some threads and discussion regarding these in the past.
I went with a Racing Dynamics bar and don't regret it, good luck.
The KLA brace would be easier to remove when necessary because the bar is bolted on both ends. While good for removal a pinned connection on both ends also reduces the effectiveness of the brace by allowing both ends to pivot.
The Racing Dynamics bar is fixed to the mounting plate on one side offering more rigidity and I've found I rarely need to remove it. There have been some threads and discussion regarding these in the past.
I went with a Racing Dynamics bar and don't regret it, good luck.
Trending Topics
#9
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Some years ago, Jon Milledge (http://jonmilledgeengineering.com/) did some measurement and math on this and determined that a strut brace was no benefit on 944 series cars. I took his advice, deleted the one I was using on my 944S, have not missed it.
Kevin
Catellus Engineering
Kevin
Catellus Engineering
#10
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Some years ago, Jon Milledge (http://jonmilledgeengineering.com/) did some measurement and math on this and determined that a strut brace was no benefit on 944 series cars. I took his advice, deleted the one I was using on my 944S, have not missed it.
Kevin
Catellus Engineering
Kevin
Catellus Engineering
There is data that shows a autocross car with and without the strut brace had no time advantage.
Ask the instructor why your car needs one?
Save your money for other suspension upgrades or professional coaching.
#11
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenville New York
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow guys!! Thanks for the info.. I guess its a placebo effect then. I swear my truck runs better after I wash it too. Yea my $ just went to 3 instructed DE events totaling $900 +. I'm sure there are die hard supporters of the brace but I will save my money for now. Thanks again, Kevin
#12
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do agree that its healthy to be skeptical of the "need" for many of the upgrades and aftermarket parts available, including factory parts. And I certainly doubted the benefit of a shock tower brace.
But I was surprised how much the 944 shock towers move just w/ the car's own weight. So they do move with corner loading. Likely the reason that the factory did utilize strut tower bracing on their motorsport cars, to include pushing the roll cage tubing out thru the firewall to tie in the shock towers on the 968 Turbo RS's.
To determine how much flex there is in the shock towers, you may want to try this for yourself. With the car sitting level on the ground, mark and measure between two known points on the shock towers. Then lift the car off the ground and recheck the measurement.
For track use - we are concerned w/ 10th's of degree w/ camber alignment, and 1/64ths of inch for toe settings, so significant body flex will create changes in dynamic alignment when the car is loaded. Is it enough to be concerned about? Is it enough that the average amateur driver can notice the difference during a club track event? Is it more than can be accounted for w/ the static alignment settings? Maybe not or even probably not. It ends up a subjective judgement call on how useful stiffening the front structure of the car is.
For certain, I absolutely agree that there are significantly more important things to upgrade on a track car (suspension, brakes, and especially safety-wise), before anyone should consider adding a strut brace.
But I was surprised how much the 944 shock towers move just w/ the car's own weight. So they do move with corner loading. Likely the reason that the factory did utilize strut tower bracing on their motorsport cars, to include pushing the roll cage tubing out thru the firewall to tie in the shock towers on the 968 Turbo RS's.
To determine how much flex there is in the shock towers, you may want to try this for yourself. With the car sitting level on the ground, mark and measure between two known points on the shock towers. Then lift the car off the ground and recheck the measurement.
For track use - we are concerned w/ 10th's of degree w/ camber alignment, and 1/64ths of inch for toe settings, so significant body flex will create changes in dynamic alignment when the car is loaded. Is it enough to be concerned about? Is it enough that the average amateur driver can notice the difference during a club track event? Is it more than can be accounted for w/ the static alignment settings? Maybe not or even probably not. It ends up a subjective judgement call on how useful stiffening the front structure of the car is.
For certain, I absolutely agree that there are significantly more important things to upgrade on a track car (suspension, brakes, and especially safety-wise), before anyone should consider adding a strut brace.
#13
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with Jim... and I can tell you that the top of my shock towers deflect almost 1/8" just from picking the car off the ground with a lift. So, do I believe those towers deflect on cornering? You bet.
Remember, we replace rubber bushings with mono-***** to try and eliminate small amounts of flex at the bushings. Shouldn't we try to eliminate as much chassis flex as possible?
One added benefit of the KLA strut brace - due to its turn-buckle style, you can actually pull the tops of the shock towers a little closer together and get a little more static negative camber than you can otherwise get from just the strut eccentrics. (Which could be a benefit if you're not running camber plates.)
Remember, we replace rubber bushings with mono-***** to try and eliminate small amounts of flex at the bushings. Shouldn't we try to eliminate as much chassis flex as possible?
One added benefit of the KLA strut brace - due to its turn-buckle style, you can actually pull the tops of the shock towers a little closer together and get a little more static negative camber than you can otherwise get from just the strut eccentrics. (Which could be a benefit if you're not running camber plates.)