Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

951 vs 968 weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2013, 10:40 AM
  #1  
reece146
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
reece146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 951 vs 968 weight

What accounts for the weight difference between a 951 and a 968?

Something real like air bags and door beams?

Is it a new method of measuring/calculating?

More sound deadening material?

Magazine marketing noise?
Old 12-22-2013, 12:31 PM
  #2  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

968 has more options in general. All the little things like extra door panel trim, extra sound insulation, mass balances... two headlight motores instead of one.. etc.
Old 12-22-2013, 01:01 PM
  #3  
reece146
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
reece146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, that makes sense.

So there is definitely extra sound insulation?

What are you referring to with respect to mass balances? Are these cars "corner balanced" with weights like the old school 911s?
Old 12-22-2013, 02:22 PM
  #4  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mass balance = vibrations dampeners. Aka heavy rubber weights. They are hidden under the carpet in the rear cubbies.

That said, a nonairbag 968 clubsport is probably lighter than a us spec full load 89 turbo s.
Old 12-22-2013, 03:03 PM
  #5  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,587
Received 658 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

Those mass dampers, they are more substantial than the 944 carpet pads?
Old 12-22-2013, 05:54 PM
  #6  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The 968 cabrio has a 10-20lbs weight in the rear. My 968 coupe had one that was only a couple lbs but I didnt see anything of note in my 951.
Old 12-24-2013, 02:29 PM
  #7  
BikePilot
Racer
 
BikePilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't find any mass balances in the rear of my 968.

The extra cam and associated head material, etc., surely adds a few lbs. The clutch is also heavier. The interior stuff is still pretty thin/light/flimsy, doubt there's a big weight difference there. Rear seats are probably lighter.

Slightly bigger sway bars might add just a little weight.

The 6spd gearbox may be heavier, I don't know.
Old 12-24-2013, 02:44 PM
  #8  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Let's see..

3.0 crank
16 valve head with dual cams as noted
Dual mass flywheel
6 speed
Longer front section/nose
Dual power headlight motors as noted

Standard swaybars are similar to 951S

The rear vibration damper was only in cabs to cancel oscillations and vibrations. It will not be found in coupes.
Old 01-01-2014, 11:28 PM
  #9  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

my '92 968 had a large rubber mat attached to the inside of the rear fender/ rear wheel well cubby storage area. It was about 6"x6" in size IIRC.

I can only assume it is sound deadening/vibration deadening.

All the 968s were built in Stuttgart vs the vast majority of 951s being built in Nekarsulm. I think the Stuttgart factory was far more liberal in it's use of glue and insulation based on my experience stripping both generations of the cars.
Old 01-02-2014, 09:23 AM
  #10  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Rich, can you please post a pic of this damper. Very curious to see what it looks like.
Old 01-02-2014, 10:31 AM
  #11  
JimV8
Rennlist Member
 
JimV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ontario
Posts: 26,377
Received 495 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Having removed the six speed transaxle in favour of a turbo five speed my back says the five speed is a least thirty pounds lighter.
Old 01-02-2014, 01:43 PM
  #12  
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The nice thing about our cars is that its easy to remove weight. I'm down to ~2850 lbs in my 951 and I still have a full interior.
Old 01-02-2014, 02:02 PM
  #13  
gerhard951
Advanced
 
gerhard951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: people s republic of new jersey
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Raj...nice pics...Garry here..we traded center caps for my sons 968...hope all is well!!
Old 01-02-2014, 02:03 PM
  #14  
gerhard951
Advanced
 
gerhard951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: people s republic of new jersey
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Raj...did you see the 968 turbo for sale on Ebay last week??
Old 01-02-2014, 05:39 PM
  #15  
travisgreen
Pro
 
travisgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimV8
Having removed the six speed transaxle in favour of a turbo five speed my back says the five speed is a least thirty pounds lighter.
Y did you choose the 5 speed over the 6 if I may ask


Quick Reply: 951 vs 968 weight



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:10 AM.