Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stainless Steel fuel lines with AN fittings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2003, 06:45 PM
  #46  
Manning
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Manning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,910
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

You really should not use a 45 degree flare tool for 37 degree fitting. Yes it will work, but your sealing area will be much smaller, and tightening "the SH&! out of the fitting" may damage the fitting,especially if you are using aluminum fittings. Granted the cheapest 37 degree tool I could find was around $100.00, but I'd rather pay that than have my car in flames.

Also, the hard line adaptors that do not require flaring are intended to be used for low pressure applications, like carburetors. They may be OK to use for this, but they make me a little nervous.
Old 04-17-2003, 12:32 PM
  #47  
944LT1
Racer
 
944LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Manning:
<strong>Also, the hard line adaptors that do not require flaring are intended to be used for low pressure applications, like carburetors. They may be OK to use for this, but they make me a little nervous.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I am definatly no expert but I did alot of research and was told the adapter was good for 300psi. The fitting that requires flairing is good for 1500psi.
Old 04-17-2003, 03:36 PM
  #48  
Manning
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Manning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,910
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

They are becoming more common, and I think are even found to be acceptable by the FAA in some applications, but when the Earl's and Aeroquip catalogs both mention that they are acceptable for lower pressure applications, I think twice. The Russell's catalog even says they are to be used with their aluminum tubing with no mention of being acceptable for use with steel tubing.
Old 04-17-2003, 06:18 PM
  #49  
Peter K.
Racer
 
Peter K.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ric, VA
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I could use a set of SS lines for my 944S but apparently no one makes them?? email me if I am wrong at peterk@wepc.us
Old 04-17-2003, 08:43 PM
  #50  
Travis - sflraver
Site Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Travis - sflraver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A great big building in the woods, FL.
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

I just found this and thought I should share it with you guys since you are going into this. It seems that a single flare on seamed tubing will eventually split the tube at the seam. You need to use a 37 double flair tool if you are going to use your stock hard lines.

Here is the link.

<a href="http://www.carcraft.com/howto/50919/index1.html" target="_blank">http://www.carcraft.com/howto/50919/index1.html</a>

I still say the hose clamps are the way to go but each to his own. Still got them for $70 a set. Have not had one complaint yet.
Old 04-17-2003, 11:50 PM
  #51  
keith
Drifting
 
keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

This is a good discussion, guys! I've found a 37 degree flaring tool to borrow, but am intriqued by the single-vs.-double flare issue...



Quick Reply: Stainless Steel fuel lines with AN fittings?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:28 AM.