944 Hooligan

kgain, still pretty big. shrink it about 66%. that will put you at 100 pixels wide.

triscadek

Dammit, resize.

Matt O.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by kgain968:
<strong>How's that I shrunk it some.............
It's only 5K and about 150 pixels wide.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Try it at 100 wide. I'm sure it will look just as good.

And Paul, that's the funniest but 3rd times a charm. 100 wide is the optimum I think. It's not like 100 is too small to see.

-Matt

Matt O.

Paul, how about this...

<img src="http://www.type944.com/avatars/triscadekavatar.jpg" alt=" - " />

and Kgain968 how about this...

<img src="http://www.type944.com/avatars/kgain968avatar.jpg" alt=" - " />

user 8430

I think it should be ok now, at this width it does not push the border/sides inwards past the default, notice the grey arrows beside the avatars, mine is at default. And is only 4.5K

triscadek

Thanks Matt

triscadek

once more

triscadek

Kewl, thanks.

Dan Gallagher

i think 150px wide is fine. i need to go and compress the filesize of mine a bit more though.

Matt O.

well the only reason why I say 100, is because, for most images it is just as easy to see what the image is at 100 px as it is at 150 px, and if you multiply that by the thousands of folks on here, that extra bit would save ALOT of bandwidth. Also, at 150 it seems the avatars take over the screen, not pushing cells or anything, but they should be something small that we can see, not having to look past them. Esthetically speaking. Just MHO.

Bryans951

test 1

Bryans951

test 1

Bryans951

I put the picture in my gallery, but I can't make it show in my profile. All I have to do is copy the link, right?

ERAU-944

lemme see mine, i may need someone to help me resize it

ERAU-944

grrr... hope this works