Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire question (not size)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2006, 04:33 PM
  #1  
Calmchaos
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Calmchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burlington. NJ
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Tire question (not size)

Heya
Ive notice that the outsides of my front tires are wearing a little fast, so I ran out with my pressure gauge today, and they both read 30-31psi. The gas cap says that the pressure should be 29front, 36back. My back tires are reading 33.
My tires are 205/55/16 on all 4 rims, and the tag says 215/60/15.
Would the pressure have to be different due to the different size? Or should I just do the 29F and 36R like the tag recommends?
Old 04-19-2006, 04:55 PM
  #2  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,665
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Is that both outside on both tires? That indicates underinflation. Outsides like left side on left tire and right side on right tire indicates too much toe-in.

Don't worry about the stated pressures. That for the OEM tires twenty years ago. Find the pressure that rides and handles right along with the right wear pattern.
Old 04-19-2006, 05:03 PM
  #3  
Calmchaos
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Calmchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burlington. NJ
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The outside and inside on both tires.... sorry.
Old 04-19-2006, 06:01 PM
  #4  
Bill.e1
Advanced
 
Bill.e1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had an 84 Corvette a few years back with 255-50 16's. The wear pattern was opposite tradition- overinflation would wear the outside because the belt overconstrained the middle (something I experience every morning getting dressed but that's a different subject).

The inside/outside wear model applies to unbelted bias ply tires. It would probably apply to unbelted radials but I don't think there is such a beast. It probably still is somewhat applicable to higher profile designs but ultra-low profile performance tires- probably not.

Set the pressures so the tires feel good to you. If you use the car as intended, you'll kill the tires long before you see any pressure effects anyway ;-)

BTW- if you get nibbling or resonance through your steering, try dropping the front pressures a bit. A softer tire can dampen some types of oscillation.

Have fun,
Bill
Old 04-20-2006, 09:49 AM
  #5  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Wow, lots of misinformation here.

Wear on both shoulders indicated underinflation, not overinflation (which is indicated by wear right down the center of the tire).

If you were using the proper tire size then the factory sticker is the inflation pressure you should use. If you begin to deviate from that inflation pressure the tires might go below the minimum load carrying capacity for the vehicle.

For example:
Stock Tire 215/60VR15
Load carrying capacity at 31 psi = 1301 lbs
Load carrying capacity at 36 psi = 1477 lbs

ASSUMING you are using standard load Euro-metric tires with the highest load index
Your Tire 205/55R16
Load carrying capacity at 30 psi = 1179 lbs
Load carrying capacity at 33 psi = 1268 lbs

If you are using tires with a lower LI it will drop even more. Just drop it until it feels right is not the proper way to handle tire pressures.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 01:00 AM
  #6  
951North
Pro
 
951North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Scotland
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Question for Matt, while you were on the subject of Load Indices is that static load index or is there a dynamic allowance built in there also, say for instance our cars weigh 3000 lbs and under braking or cornering with weight transfer maybye we could see 1300 pounds at a front corner, albeit only for a short duration. Would you have to choose tires that would meet these dynamic loads?

jason
Old 05-03-2006, 01:46 PM
  #7  
Scott at Team Harco
Just a car guy
Rennlist Member

 
Scott at Team Harco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Lyon, Michigan, Ewe Ess Eh
Posts: 9,927
Received 836 Likes on 525 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 951North
Question for Matt, while you were on the subject of Load Indices is that static load index or is there a dynamic allowance built in there also, say for instance our cars weigh 3000 lbs and under braking or cornering with weight transfer maybye we could see 1300 pounds at a front corner, albeit only for a short duration. Would you have to choose tires that would meet these dynamic loads?

jason
Interesting question. Unfortunately, there are many variables when it comes to vehicles, their use and the habits of the drivers. Tire load ratings are meant for static (or normal) loading. The 'official' rule on this is that the maximum normal load on a given tire shall not exceed 88% of the maximum load rating (usually embossed on the tire sidewall). This is also at the maximum inflation pressure of the tire (also embossed on the tire, in most cases).

Beginning June 1, 2007 this becomes 94% of that maximum load with tire inflated to the vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold tire pressure.

So to indirectly answer your question - there is some margin built-in to account for dynamic loading, though it is not specifically considered in those terms. As a general - common sense - rule, you should have tires with load ratings well above the maximum (static) loading possible for your vehicle. The tires should be properly inflated - never underinflated - and an appropriate speed rating should be considered. This latter attribute is probably as important as any when it comes to dynamic load capacity of a given tire. Don't skimp when it comes to the speed rating of your tires.
Old 05-03-2006, 04:25 PM
  #8  
951North
Pro
 
951North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Scotland
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scott at Team Harco
Interesting question. Unfortunately, there are many variables when it comes to vehicles, their use and the habits of the drivers. Tire load ratings are meant for static (or normal) loading. The 'official' rule on this is that the maximum normal load on a given tire shall not exceed 88% of the maximum load rating (usually embossed on the tire sidewall). This is also at the maximum inflation pressure of the tire (also embossed on the tire, in most cases).

Beginning June 1, 2007 this becomes 94% of that maximum load with tire inflated to the vehicle manufacturer's recommended cold tire pressure.

So to indirectly answer your question - there is some margin built-in to account for dynamic loading, though it is not specifically considered in those terms. As a general - common sense - rule, you should have tires with load ratings well above the maximum (static) loading possible for your vehicle. The tires should be properly inflated - never underinflated - and an appropriate speed rating should be considered. This latter attribute is probably as important as any when it comes to dynamic load capacity of a given tire. Don't skimp when it comes to the speed rating of your tires.
Interesting, how many people actually run those types of pressures though? what 44-50 PSI Maximums... strange they would be increasing the percents (narrowing the margin between Normal to dynamic).

Last edited by 951North; 05-03-2006 at 05:40 PM.
Old 05-03-2006, 05:10 PM
  #9  
jenket944
Pro
 
jenket944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And to throw another wrench into the discussion...
If you go +1 on the wheel size (from 15" to 16") you typically need to keep a little more pressure in the tire to compensate for the shorter sidewall. I had this issue when I put 968 wheels on my NA. Had to add about 2 psi over the OEM ratings to get the wear pattern to even out.
Old 05-03-2006, 05:33 PM
  #10  
SchnellerUmsetzer
Drifting
 
SchnellerUmsetzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The wear could also suggest bad ball joints!
Old 05-04-2006, 08:49 AM
  #11  
Scott at Team Harco
Just a car guy
Rennlist Member

 
Scott at Team Harco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Lyon, Michigan, Ewe Ess Eh
Posts: 9,927
Received 836 Likes on 525 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 951North
Interesting, how many people actually run those types of pressures though? what 44-50 PSI Maximums... strange they would be increasing the percents (narrowing the margin between Normal to dynamic).
The logic behind the federal rating beginning in 2007 is to make it more realistic to 'real-world' situations. The reason the percentage goes up to 94% (when compared against 88%) is that the recommended cold tire pressure is less than the tires rated maximum pressure (and some of the load carrying capacity is used up at this lower pressure). You are correct - this is closer to the maximum load carrying capacity of the tire. You are also correct that few if any people run their tires at the max pressure. Nor should they.

The proper pressure tends to be at or near the manufacturer's recommended cold tire pressure. The upcoming rating is more realistic in that it is taken at this recommended - real world - pressure. To drive your vehicle with your tires inflated to the maximum pressure is sure to make your dentist and chiropractor happy.

On the surface, going to 94% seems like the margin for safety is being reduced. Actually it is not. It is just a different and more realistic way of looking at the same thing. Also, keep in mind this is the minimum standard as defined by FMVSS. In reality, most quality tires that you and I are likely to buy, far exceed this minimum.
Old 05-04-2006, 07:15 PM
  #12  
Tom
Pro
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

For what its worth the recommended pressures for my 944S with 16" wheels were exactly the same as for my 84 944 with 15" wheels so it would seem the size of the wheel tire (205/55 225/50x16, 215/60x15) doesn't matter vs Factory recommendations. Individually our goals may be quite different (factory were for fuel economy, safe amount of understeer) so we might deviata a lot and use different tire pressures as well.
Old 05-04-2006, 08:14 PM
  #13  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

In reality, most quality tires that you and I are likely to buy, far exceed this minimum.
By a HUGE margin at that.

Tom, did you work for the Porsche factory? If not dont make claims like fuel economy, understeer, etc. At Toyota fuel economy is near the top of the list, at Porsche it doesnt even show up. Performance is at the top of their list. Tires are designed for high performance cars with performance in mind. Safe amounts of understeer are built into things like the alignment settings and suspension components.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote



Quick Reply: Tire question (not size)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:01 PM.