Devil's Advocate on my Cold Air Intake Theory..
#1
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Devil's Advocate on my Cold Air Intake Theory..
If some of you remember since I've been posting on Pelican since the year 2000, I've been hungering for power gains on my old 84. 3 years ago I put the idea to sleep after I had lost 6-7 HP on the dyno with a cone filter and Dynomax straight through muffler, Bursch header and 2.5" piping.
However, something got me thinking last night; what if that straight through setup I was running was too straight through??? I am talking to the point where I was losing exhaust density because of the piping and the cone filter was contributing even more to the loss.
This morning I gave the sound issue a thought. Perhaps it's possible to run a cone filter (NO POWER GAIN, YET NO LOSS) and still maintain the factory 2.25" piping with no catalytic convertor and a factory muffler? I think I'm gonna give it a wack this weekend and see if I feel any loss of power here like I felt on dyno day a couple years ago...
Hmmmm....
However, something got me thinking last night; what if that straight through setup I was running was too straight through??? I am talking to the point where I was losing exhaust density because of the piping and the cone filter was contributing even more to the loss.
This morning I gave the sound issue a thought. Perhaps it's possible to run a cone filter (NO POWER GAIN, YET NO LOSS) and still maintain the factory 2.25" piping with no catalytic convertor and a factory muffler? I think I'm gonna give it a wack this weekend and see if I feel any loss of power here like I felt on dyno day a couple years ago...
Hmmmm....
#2
Bigger,more open pipes and cone filters etc will usually result in a net loss of hp unless you add more gas to the increased amount of air...and an 2.25-inch exhaust is enough until atleast 220-230 hp. Add the gas necessary for maintaining your previous A/F,and a cold air intake cone filter could possiby give you one horse or so... so no enourmous gains just like the Ricers state from their "rear-end-dynos"..
#3
Race Director
Here are some comments I made related to stock vs no cat 2.25" pipe. Both with stock airbox. I have not seen a cone car increase power from the cone. I have heard of tests where power is either not gained or is lost from a cone.
--------------------------------------
This is not a apples to apples test, but I dynoed my 944-spec car on dyno dynamics dyno couple weekends ago. I came to 134 RWHP.
Another driver dynoed his 86 944 spec car also. I came out to 118 hp on the same dyno about an hour later.
Differecnes between my 944 spec and his.
His car was a completely stock untouched motor. Stock chip, air box, Cat, Muffler
My motor was just rebuilt. Rings were original 150k rings. Head had combustion chamber cleaned (carbon removal only) and light machine work done a couples years ago. All to stock specs. Not blueprinted or anything. Stock 9.5:1 Compression. Stock paper filter, air box and muffler
Non-stock items I was running were a Steve R chip and no Cat.
Differencing in HP = 16 rwhp. I am guessing that most comes from removing the cat. Next chunk comes from the cleaned but still stock head, 3rd chunk from the chip. The ower of the other spec car was going to pull the cat and re dyno to get numbers, but I have not heard from him.
--------------------------------------
This is not a apples to apples test, but I dynoed my 944-spec car on dyno dynamics dyno couple weekends ago. I came to 134 RWHP.
Another driver dynoed his 86 944 spec car also. I came out to 118 hp on the same dyno about an hour later.
Differecnes between my 944 spec and his.
His car was a completely stock untouched motor. Stock chip, air box, Cat, Muffler
My motor was just rebuilt. Rings were original 150k rings. Head had combustion chamber cleaned (carbon removal only) and light machine work done a couples years ago. All to stock specs. Not blueprinted or anything. Stock 9.5:1 Compression. Stock paper filter, air box and muffler
Non-stock items I was running were a Steve R chip and no Cat.
Differencing in HP = 16 rwhp. I am guessing that most comes from removing the cat. Next chunk comes from the cleaned but still stock head, 3rd chunk from the chip. The ower of the other spec car was going to pull the cat and re dyno to get numbers, but I have not heard from him.
#4
Race Director
Originally Posted by Skunk Workz
Bigger,more open pipes and cone filters etc will usually result in a net loss of hp unless you add more gas to the increased amount of air...and an 2.25-inch exhaust is enough until atleast 220-230 hp. Add the gas necessary for maintaining your previous A/F,and a cold air intake cone filter could possiby give you one horse or so... so no enourmous gains just like the Ricers state from their "rear-end-dynos"..
As for the gains from a CAI, they are not from Ricers "rear-end-dynos." The results are real, documented, and reproduceable. The problem is, nobody here wants to listen to how a CAI makes power (hint, little to none is actually from the cold air). The SE-R Cup racers have done considerable testing and found they get 10-12whp. Documented and repeatable under controlled dyno testing. The thing that may prevent big gains from occuring in a 944 is the barn door AFM is a big restriction. Still, a properly engineered CAI should work nearly as well on a 944 as a Honduh or a Nissan.
As I have said a number of times, the power from a CAI is gained from resonance tuning. AEM actually tests prototype CAIs by starting with a set length and cutting the length by a half inch and retesting (keep repeating). They configure their final product at the length that makes the most HP. Length, diameter, and even placement of the AFM within the length of tube can affect power production (I watched a friend gain an honest 2 hp by moving his MAF 6"). The trick, IMHO for our cars is to fabricate an adapter that tapers smoothly from 3" round to the square opening of the AFM. So far the only one I've seen that really comes close to doing this correctly is a plastic piece sold with a worthless filter on eBay. I will be having a one-off adapter CNC machined before I start tuning my car. If I get the gains I think are available, we (NISsport) will produce a kit.
I agree with Pepe (reference the screen name thread) that exhaust tubing shouldn't be a big factor, and in fact, it's possible to go too big. However, exhaust can be tricky and can depend a lot upon the header. The Bursch header doesn't seem to do much. A $600 header from JME is supposed to be much superior to anything else out there.
My question would be the muffler. Too many poor ones out there. Dynomax doesn't blow my skirt up. Magnaflow might be a good one to try. Remus seems to be a superior product, but you pay for it and if no one has figured out a proven set-up, there are no guarantees. Absolutely stick with a perforated straight-through muffler. No chambers, and for God's sake, NO louvered mufflers. They backpressure worse than a chambered muffler. The so-called "turbo" mufflers suck too.
#5
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
of course I'm not speaking in ricer terms, but I liked the sound my '84 produced when I had my design on it. It sounded mean!
#6
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I've been pettling the thought, I'm slowly getting my tools aquired to get some fab work done. The problem would be the dyno time. I was kinda thinking just for fun try the butt-dyno and a few ft of pipe, see where I get? I know, it's not proven, but I do want to play with it, heck, my little project isn't proven either for that matter.
Trending Topics
#8
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
If perry would come through on his dyno meet (peeeeerrryyyyyyy!!!!) i could test out the pipe length factor in the equation of hp from a cold air intake. ( i just got one)
#9
Rennlist Member
For street driving a a free-flowing intake and exhaust will hurt the performance of a 2.5l n/a. Afterall, its the low to mid-range that lacks power.
General rule: longer intake tubing = more low end hp; longer exhaust tubing = more low end hp
This is the same case with backpressure...but of course there are limits and plenty of exceptions.
It building a fast car was clear as day there would be no tuners...
General rule: longer intake tubing = more low end hp; longer exhaust tubing = more low end hp
This is the same case with backpressure...but of course there are limits and plenty of exceptions.
It building a fast car was clear as day there would be no tuners...
#10
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Campeck
ok...i have a gutted cat. a FR wilk chip. and almost brand new rebuilt engine. why oh why am i only at 127 rwhp?????
There are way too many factors which can explain poorer performance, so I wont bother listing.
#11
Race Director
Originally Posted by Serge944
For street driving a a free-flowing intake and exhaust will hurt the performance of a 2.5l n/a. Afterall, its the low to mid-range that lacks power.
General rule: longer intake tubing = more low end hp; longer exhaust tubing = more low end hp
This is the same case with backpressure...but of course there are limits and plenty of exceptions.
It building a fast car was clear as day there would be no tuners...
General rule: longer intake tubing = more low end hp; longer exhaust tubing = more low end hp
This is the same case with backpressure...but of course there are limits and plenty of exceptions.
It building a fast car was clear as day there would be no tuners...
#12
Originally Posted by Geo
As for the gains from a CAI, they are not from Ricers "rear-end-dynos."
As I have said a number of times, the power from a CAI is gained from resonance tuning. AEM actually tests prototype CAIs by starting with a set length and cutting the length by a half inch and retesting (keep repeating). They configure their final product at the length that makes the most HP.
I agree with Pepe (reference the screen name thread) that exhaust tubing shouldn't be a big factor, and in fact, it's possible to go too big. However, exhaust can be tricky and can depend a lot upon the header.
The so-called "turbo" mufflers suck too.
And,Geo,that is just what it does...it sucks... by creating a vortex in the muffler,thus making a lower pressure zone in the middle...effectively making the exhaust go down the pipe into a lower pressure than atmospheric pressure...just like you would get behind the car at high speeds,if you placed the exhaust outlet exactly in the lowest pressure area behind the car. Like you should...but I guess your race car already has it placed there?
#13
Race Director
Originally Posted by Skunk Workz
Most CAI's I've seen done here have the guys themselves claim outrageous hp gains...until the dyno proves them wrong. But like you stated,it all has to do with actually testing for what works,not just bolt on some huge cone and imagine the "new-found hp". Properly sized, made and tested...they work.
Originally Posted by Skunk Workz
Remember to keep an open mind about headers too...who says the stock header primaries are the perfect size? Who says they are too small? What if they are too big,making them not as efficient as they could be? Haven't done any testing on that,though...but I will...just remember that making parts bigger or just flowing more isn't always the way to go for your engine size and HP goal.
Originally Posted by Skunk Workz
And,Geo,that is just what it does...it sucks... by creating a vortex in the muffler,thus making a lower pressure zone in the middle...effectively making the exhaust go down the pipe into a lower pressure than atmospheric pressure...just like you would get behind the car at high speeds,if you placed the exhaust outlet exactly in the lowest pressure area behind the car. Like you should...but I guess your race car already has it placed there?
#14
Nordschleife Master
Porsche not run by gods? Whatever. The engineers there do seem to be blessed, though.
Folks always want a few extra, and cheap, ponies. And I'm one of them, fer sher. However, it's pretty easy to size the intake plumbing to the needs of the engine. I tried a special open-top air box on my 928 and _lost_ horsepower on the dyno with it. Of course there are a lot of factors involved, but the intake was already sized right and letting in warmer air just caused a less-dense mixture to get sucked in. Here's the thread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/146484-race-air-cleaner-top-project-2-a.html#post1453087
Since there has got to be a drop across the air filter a larger air filter would be better. Still duct it to cooler air and the easy way is using that carefully-provided hole in the fender.
It the buttometer-verification area, I know my '73 Riviera has more pull with a 3" open element filter than the stock 2" closed assembly. The closed unit still does not has outside air connection so there's no temp difference in the in-coming charge.
Folks always want a few extra, and cheap, ponies. And I'm one of them, fer sher. However, it's pretty easy to size the intake plumbing to the needs of the engine. I tried a special open-top air box on my 928 and _lost_ horsepower on the dyno with it. Of course there are a lot of factors involved, but the intake was already sized right and letting in warmer air just caused a less-dense mixture to get sucked in. Here's the thread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/146484-race-air-cleaner-top-project-2-a.html#post1453087
Since there has got to be a drop across the air filter a larger air filter would be better. Still duct it to cooler air and the easy way is using that carefully-provided hole in the fender.
It the buttometer-verification area, I know my '73 Riviera has more pull with a 3" open element filter than the stock 2" closed assembly. The closed unit still does not has outside air connection so there's no temp difference in the in-coming charge.
#15
Originally Posted by Geo
Yes sir. And simply blocking off the filter from the rest of the engine bay does not a real CAI make. Our cars are blessed with hole already for the stock intake. This is where a CAI should route. That's where mine will.
In my case, I have detailed specs from Jon Milledge Engineering for a header that has shown through dyno testing to be more effective than the others that are available. Since it's proprietary information that Jon sells with with other information to people who are building race car, it's not my place to share it here.
Actually, most dyno testing shows a shorter exhaust makes the most hp. Here we are allowed to dump it out the side. I never really thought about the fact that dumping out the back may take advantage of the partial vacuum behind the car..