924 Carrera GT v 968 Turbo S
#16
Burning Brakes
wow that article is cool. and that white turbo S is just sweet. i would love to see an S up close. I herd one of the reasons they did not produce many turdo S's was bease they were cheaper and just as fast as the 911 Turbo of the time. i wish they mase some more 968 turbos
#17
Race Director
Thanks for sharing! I need to go clean off my keyboard now!
Making relicas of both of those cars are is my "to do before I die" list. Someday............................
Making relicas of both of those cars are is my "to do before I die" list. Someday............................
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by tifosiman
Thanks for sharing! I need to go clean off my keyboard now!
Making relicas of both of those cars are is my "to do before I die" list. Someday............................
Making relicas of both of those cars are is my "to do before I die" list. Someday............................
#26
Rennlist Member
Fantastic article. Many thanks!
I believe there are flow issues with a 16V head in a turbocharged engine configuration. Porsche chose the safer route with an 8V head.
Originally Posted by Campeck
nvm...but why use the 8 valve head?
#28
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In reply to.
[I believe there are flow issues with a 16V head in a turbocharged engine configuration. Porsche chose the safer route with an 8V head.]
Doubt thats right, more a case of cost saving. They already had a good turbo set up (the 8 valve head) which had lots of potential. Why spend money developing the 16 valve head when it was only a limited run car ? Also the 16v head has been used successfully in a home built turbo 968, came across an article in 911 & Porsche world about one of these. It was dyno'ed at a useful 420 bhp !
[I believe there are flow issues with a 16V head in a turbocharged engine configuration. Porsche chose the safer route with an 8V head.]
Doubt thats right, more a case of cost saving. They already had a good turbo set up (the 8 valve head) which had lots of potential. Why spend money developing the 16 valve head when it was only a limited run car ? Also the 16v head has been used successfully in a home built turbo 968, came across an article in 911 & Porsche world about one of these. It was dyno'ed at a useful 420 bhp !
#29
Race Car
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Albany, CA: celebrating 100 years of independence from Berkeley, CA
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Very cool article! Thanks for posting.
IIRC, there is a 968 Turbo RS in the states (but not a 968 Turbo S). Jason at Paragon Products purchased it from Bruce Corwin about a year ago. That's gotta a be a sweet car to drive as well.
Originally Posted by TaylorSea4
Did the 968 S come to the states??
#30
Race Director
Originally Posted by Steve PH
In reply to.
[I believe there are flow issues with a 16V head in a turbocharged engine configuration. Porsche chose the safer route with an 8V head.]
Doubt thats right, more a case of cost saving. They already had a good turbo set up (the 8 valve head) which had lots of potential. Why spend money developing the 16 valve head when it was only a limited run car ? Also the 16v head has been used successfully in a home built turbo 968, came across an article in 911 & Porsche world about one of these. It was dyno'ed at a useful 420 bhp !
[I believe there are flow issues with a 16V head in a turbocharged engine configuration. Porsche chose the safer route with an 8V head.]
Doubt thats right, more a case of cost saving. They already had a good turbo set up (the 8 valve head) which had lots of potential. Why spend money developing the 16 valve head when it was only a limited run car ? Also the 16v head has been used successfully in a home built turbo 968, came across an article in 911 & Porsche world about one of these. It was dyno'ed at a useful 420 bhp !