Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

For those running a square setup, how do you like it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2019, 10:26 AM
  #16  
AkechiMotors
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AkechiMotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 336
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944crazy
Imho the 50/50 weight distribution really lends itself to a square tyre setup. If you are building a high power car then get yourself at least 9" wide wheels all round. Personally I run 265/35r18 semi slicks all round and really like it.... enough rear grip for putting the power down out of corners, and enough front grip to put the big reds to good use while braking. Thinking of moving to some 17 inch slicks for track work this year though.
You can get a 9" tire up front? Do you have to roll the fender?
Old 02-15-2019, 01:29 PM
  #17  
StoogeMoe
Rennlist Member
 
StoogeMoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 2,752
Received 106 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Is this for the track or the street? Do you have a turbo or NA? For an NA at the track, you want the lightest wheel possible. I ran 7x15 cookie cutters all around on my NA. A stock 944 understeers and rolls pretty badly. I corrected this with springs, torsion bars, and sway bars. It was then possible to dial in a very nice balance and fun car. It was not necessary to run a staggered setup. This is not desirable at the track because you want to be able to move tires around to maximize the life of the tires due to uneven wear.
Old 02-15-2019, 05:56 PM
  #18  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,122
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Martinic
What might be the reason Porsche went with the staggered setup? Was it a marketing thing?
Everything I read over the last 20 years, some articles contemporaneous with the release of the car (S2 89) said they are staggered in the US because US drivers suck. We cant control the car, so they killed the perfectly neutral handling and staggered the wheels so we get understeer. If we didn't have understeer we would break the law of physics.

Note that the widowmaker lawsuits were in full swing at this time. What was the HP of the first 930? What's the HP of the 951? The company as a car maker was on the brink of insolvency every day with those lawsuits hanging over their head.
The following users liked this post:
Qtrfoil (05-14-2020)
Old 02-15-2019, 06:04 PM
  #19  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom R.
Everything I read over the last 20 years, some articles contemporaneous with the release of the car (S2 89) said they are staggered in the US because US drivers suck. We cant control the car, so they killed the perfectly neutral handling and staggered the wheels so we get understeer. If we didn't have understeer we would break the law of physics.

Note that the widowmaker lawsuits were in full swing at this time. What was the HP of the first 930? What's the HP of the 951? The company as a car maker was on the brink of insolvency every day with those lawsuits hanging over their head.
951s were square setup as delivered in Europe?

And if lawyers have anything to do with performance limits on expensive sports cars, that would be quite ironic as I'm sure many of them go to court to make the money to buy those very cars....
Old 02-20-2019, 12:43 AM
  #20  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,122
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Martinic


951s were square setup as delivered in Europe?
Dont know. Pretty sure the Road & Track article from 88 for the 89 S2 discussed the staggered setup. May have been a different magazine that made the comment about understeer being made standard on US cars. .

Originally Posted by Dan Martinic
And if lawyers have anything to do with performance limits on expensive sports cars, that would be quite ironic as I'm sure many of them go to court to make the money to buy those very cars....
The company survived because it did R&D for other manufacturers. The 80s and 90s were terrible for them. The steel strike when the Carrera came out hurt the ability to get aluminum for the wheels, the drop in value of the dollar raised the price of the cars and nobody wanted them, and the list goes on. The widowmakers ere the icing on the cake.

Old 05-12-2020, 03:52 PM
  #21  
joseph mitro
Rennlist Member
 
joseph mitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,006
Received 245 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

raising this thread back up.
I'm not looking for a square setup, but rather 8" wheels up front on early offset 951 struts.
I assume an 8x16 Fuchs wheel with 23mm will fit. Can anyone confirm?

along those lines, how about a 9" rear wheel with 23mm offset?
Old 05-12-2020, 05:01 PM
  #22  
PF
Rennlist Member
 
PF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,260
Received 364 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joseph mitro
raising this thread back up.
I'm not looking for a square setup, but rather 8" wheels up front on early offset 951 struts.
I assume an 8x16 Fuchs wheel with 23mm will fit. Can anyone confirm?

along those lines, how about a 9" rear wheel with 23mm offset?
You should get 1986 944 Turbo Cup 8" Fuchs for the front and 9" 930 Fuchs for the rear. Very Nice look, superlight and the ET you want. Very hard to find but they come out every now and then.
Old 05-12-2020, 05:31 PM
  #23  
Braymond
Rennlist Member
 
Braymond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joseph mitro
raising this thread back up.
I'm not looking for a square setup, but rather 8" wheels up front on early offset 951 struts.
I assume an 8x16 Fuchs wheel with 23mm will fit. Can anyone confirm?

along those lines, how about a 9" rear wheel with 23mm offset?
I've read that the Fuchs wheels are prone to cracking and failure over time when exposed to heavy conditions like track time. Given the cost and availability of the Fuchs, I'd recommend going with the phone dials. Sixteen inch phone dials are available for early offset 944s in 7" (PN 951.362.114.00) and 8" (PN 951.362.116.00). The 16s are harder to find than the 15s, but much easier (and cheaper) to find than the Fuchs.

I have been running square 15" phone dials with 225/45s for autocross and my car (late offset) is neutral with a tiny bit of oversteer, but I've updated most of the suspension based on recommendations I found on Clark's Garage. I recently purchased 16" narrow spokes (7" front, 8" rear) which I intend to try out this year (COVID permitting). Based on the results I may try to find another set and run square 8" all around with 245/45-16s.

There's a good source here for Porsche wheels weights that includes rim diameter and width, part number, and offset. Note the big difference in weight for some of these wheels. Wheel weight should be a major consideration for a track wheel. Many of the wheels on this list are very hard to find or very expensive or both.
Old 05-12-2020, 07:28 PM
  #24  
joseph mitro
Rennlist Member
 
joseph mitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,006
Received 245 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

I'm building a 924 Carrera GT replica using an 87 924S and early offset turbo struts/brakes, so I want the correct appearance with Fuchs but I want 8/9s instead of 7/8s for track use.

I've got my eye on some 8x16 Fuchs with 23mm offset and I'm pretty sure they will fit up front, just wanted to verify.

what's the offset on those turbo Cup Fuchs? I wasn't aware of those - only know about the 8/9 late offset magnesium wheels. for Fuchs, the offsets I've seen for 8x16 are either +10 or +23.
Old 10-15-2020, 04:39 AM
  #25  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joseph mitro
I've got my eye on some 8x16 Fuchs with 23mm offset and I'm pretty sure they will fit up front, just wanted to verify.
Were you ever able to source a set of Fuchs for your project?

Yes, the 8" et23 Fuchs [951 p/n] will fit on the front of your 924 CGT. Those at the front, paired with 9" et15 Fuchs [911 p/n] at the rear, are what the Escort Cups ran in '85/'86. Note: 8" et11 Fuchs [911 p/n] will not clear 951 baby black Brembos.
Old 10-15-2020, 08:29 AM
  #26  
joseph mitro
Rennlist Member
 
joseph mitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,006
Received 245 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Yes I got the 8x16 I was referring to. The project has been on hold a few months but will resume soon
Old 10-18-2020, 03:09 PM
  #27  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Are you planning to run the stock 2.5L motor?



Quick Reply: For those running a square setup, how do you like it?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:03 AM.