speednme

Where the He** on my posts did I say I don't have a 911 Turbo you arrogant story telling troll...this was my first post..If you're going to quote me have the decency to be correct...
Either way you're not wrong..since the inception these cars were suppose to be called 911 Turbo. That's what they were. Originally the fenders were welded on a Carrera body..oh wait...a 911 body. Today some call a new 911 Turbo a 991 Turbo. 991 is the internal code but it is still widely used. The 911 moniker is still alive and kicking...just seems that using internal codes is very accepting today. When ordering stock parts for your "930"...most items begin with #930..regardless of year...as I stated before, there really is no wrong answer here....

TT Surgeon

No, yours is much nicer!
Yes, I saw that 997 thread, people banned right and left. I stayed out of that one.
(Btw, I can't believe this thread has gone on 10 pages)
C

cityguy

Oooh Oooh. I'm a-scared. Speedy has resorted to name calling once again. The act of a small mind, indeed.

Your signature says you have a 930 and you have been bucking me for 10 pages that it is a 930 not a 911 Turbo. That is your gripe, your argument. You content your yellowed eyed car is a 930 not a 911 turbo. It has been your continuous nauseating rhetoric.

Show me your signature that you have a 1986 911 Turbo. Speedy, 1986 911 Turbo says it is an internal code, parts code, vin code 930 but its name is 911 Turbo.




Ok. I am correct. Your point is lost.

Quote:

Originally Posted by speednme

...just seems that using internal codes is very accepting today. When ordering stock parts for your "930"...most items begin with #930..regardless of year...as I stated before, there really is no wrong answer here....

Internal codes, part numbers again? Geez you are one trick pony.

The original question essentially was 'Do I have a 911 Turbo or a 930'? Not what is my internal code or what does my parts number start with and, speedy you forget your VIN diatribe. You are not accepting the facts and using secondary information for identification and not actual name of the car.

Read slowly speedy it may sink in.

The OP is in agreement on his 1989. It is a 1989 911 Turbo. It is listed with Sloan as what? A 1989 911 Turbo. Ya ya it has an internal reference to type 930 but what is it? --> a Porsche 911 Turbo.

Again-->

The only 930 cars were from 1975 to 1979

After 1980 Porsche Ing. renamed them to 911 Turbo - exemption noted - the 930S Euro slope.

paddict

Are you sure about that?

If you look at sales material:

• 1975 Turbo Carrera: http://coochas.com/brochures/Resourc...-1975intro.pdf
• 1976 Turbo Carrera: http://coochas.com/brochures/Resourc...nd912-1976.pdf
• 1977 Turbo Carrera: http://coochas.com/brochures/Resources/911-1977.pdf
• 1979 Turbo: http://photos.stuttcars.info/upload/...nical-data.pdf

Maybe the 930 just never existed...

Except of course for the euro 930S as you already stated and as shown in TT Surgeon's brochure!

speednme

I realized that all you really give a sh** about is being correct...no matter how wrong you are. You're not really interested in being part of this community..so why waste everyone's time here? You have nothing to offer but your self rightenous. Btw nothing I said was meant to try and scare you..but once again you read something and made up your mind in my meaning. You're a master of twisting words to suit you....politician?

cityguy

Wow. You may be on to something.

cityguy

No, I am am trying to answer the OPs question as to the name of his car.

You insist it is a 930.

I know it is a 911 Turbo.

It was manufactured by Porsche Ing, marketed, sold, title and registered as a 911 Turbo. Not a 930. How hard is that to believe? Notwithstanding your continuous internal code, part number, and VIN smoke and mirrors.

Thank you. I try.

speednme

Ha! what is it that most politicians in Congress have.....LAW DEGREES..now that explains it...you may not be a Politician but you swim in the same waters..engineers of word manipulation... only to suit yourselves...and your enormous EGOS....

UDPride

No it wasnt. That was your first mistake. The question was:

"Is it correct to call my car a 930 or is there a distinction? He also says no 930's were made in 1989?"

....and thats a VERY different question than "is the name of my car a 911 Turbo?" which you have been hung up on by your own inability to read for comprehension.

I have a nephew named Noah. But he is also my nephew at the same time. I call him both and both are correct. This duality of descriptive citizenship lives among us in all facets of life. It's not high-level syntax.

Your second mistake was assuming others were arguing whether the name of the car was "911 Turbo". They aren't.

What they are saying is you can call your car both a 930 and 911 Turbo at the same time -- the word "name" never came up until you interjected it. Here, I'll refresh your memory.

Post #16:

Let me fix it for you:

What's this "we" stuff? You got a mouse in your pocket?

Nobody even approached the subject of the name of the car until you brought it up (it was your term, not anyone else's), because nobody was really questioning the name of the car to begin with. So the lonely self-inflicted circular argument with yourself began into the infinite death spiral we now have.

The OP asked is there was a distinction, and there is a BIG distinction. A 911 Turbo is a generic name that represents a half dozen different models over five decades. A 930 is a specific model type that represents one model over 15 years.

930 is a model type. 911 Turbo is a name. Both are descriptions that identify the same damn car. Even my 4yr old nephew can see this elementary logic.

cityguy

It was exactly that . Where you here when I told him to post the question on this forum if he questions the name of his car?


The OP was. I already knew.

You bet. Thanks.

cityguy

This bears repeating. I almost most missed its importance with that long winded diatribe about nephews and mice.


Yesssir. You are the man. I thank you.

930 is a model type. 911 Turbo is a name

Automan9 has his answer.

speednme

This was in my second post(#19)!!!! in this thread....So to truly answer someone..one should say "I have a 911 Turbo type 930"
...Is that not the same thing UD Pride said? it took 10 pages for cityguy to realize this? unfu**ing real....

Thank you UD Pride!!!!!!

cityguy

One could say that and one being you, but you don't. You insist you have a '930' not a 911 Turbo. You could have a type following it of 930 but no - yours is just a 930...and is incorrect all by itself.

I have been saying this all along. It is a 911 Turbo. Ya wanna add the type, and the color of its eyes? Knock yourself out but it must start with 911 Turbo not 930 and not 930 alone. That is the type...not the name of the car

If and when Speedy shows that he realizes the name of ole yellow eyes is 911 Turbo...with or without the subset of its type by a change in his signature he will then show that realizes that he has <drum role please> a 911 Turbo.

9Eleven

Dude, you better get on Ebay and straighten all of this out.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Cars-Trucks-...p2050890.m1603

cityguy

Not my job.

People like the speed keep leaving the name of the car off and refer to it as a 930 and it is a 911 Turbo....and ya the internal code is 930 for his but what is it? It is a 911 Turbo.

I like accuracy.

930 as the name is incorrect. It is a shortening of 911 Turbo type 930 and 930 by itself really refers to 1975 to 1979 cars.

Me?

I have owned a fleet of 911 Turbos including two 930 cars. They were the only 930 cars. The others were 911 Turbos and of many different types.

This never happened: " Honey take the 930..no the 993...wait it is a 996? Aw never mind just take the 911 Turbo to the store"