Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Carrera 3.2 Performance mystery and Chips (long)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2008, 12:11 PM
  #91  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"I really think this is the magic!"

Really? It's called pushing the timing maps or on a 911SC it's called turning the
distributor a few degrees.

And as was mentioned in the same post, tweaking of the fuel maps at part throttle
has basically no effect because of the closed-loop O2 system. And at WOT,
very minor effects result there. And besides the engine is driven at part throttle
the majority of the time anyway. These fuel map issues have been discussed many
times here on Rennlist and other forums.
Old 03-14-2008, 02:06 PM
  #92  
Dave Thomas
Racer
 
Dave Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by scarceller
1267355358 is a stock chip for 89 USA Carrera. This is one of the better chips the only other more agressive stock chip I know of was the 89 Euro chip. A few better Porsche chips do exist but only for specialty cars ie: ClubSport.
Also stock in later '88's (my '88 Carrera came with the "8" chip). I believe the Club Sport chip is identical except for a raised rev limit, need to check my archives to verify.
Old 03-14-2008, 02:09 PM
  #93  
Dave Thomas
Racer
 
Dave Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
"I really think this is the magic!"

Really? It's called pushing the timing maps or on a 911SC it's called turning the
distributor a few degrees.

And as was mentioned in the same post, tweaking of the fuel maps at part throttle
has basically no effect because of the closed-loop O2 system. And at WOT,
very minor effects result there. And besides the engine is driven at part throttle
the majority of the time anyway. These fuel map issues have been discussed many
times here on Rennlist and other forums.
Jesus, give it up already. Everyone understands and no one cares. Didn't you just get bounced from the Pelican boards?
Old 03-14-2008, 02:45 PM
  #94  
scarceller
Racer
 
scarceller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Thomas
Also stock in later '88's (my '88 Carrera came with the "8" chip). I believe the Club Sport chip is identical except for a raised rev limit, need to check my archives to verify.
Dave, thx for the info on the Club Sport. Was the Club Sport based on the US or Euro chip? or did the US and Euro cars use the same chip?
Old 03-14-2008, 03:47 PM
  #95  
Dave Thomas
Racer
 
Dave Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by scarceller
Dave, thx for the info on the Club Sport. Was the Club Sport based on the US or Euro chip? or did the US and Euro cars use the same chip?
The "8" chip (1267355358) and the US Club Sport chip are identical in every way, except the rev limit on the "8* is 6540, and the rev limit on the CS is 6840. Don't know if the Euro Club Sport chips were different from the US Club Sport chips.
Old 03-14-2008, 06:43 PM
  #96  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"except the rev limit on the "8* is 6540"

Actually per the Porsche manual WKD 423 020, the RPM limit is 6520 to be exact.
Some tuners (as mentioned on this thread) set the limit to 6840 vs the 6520,
which Porsche set for the Club Sport (USA & EURO) & which had a non-standard engine,
e.g. hollow valves (per WKD 494 021).
Old 03-15-2008, 09:09 AM
  #97  
Dave Thomas
Racer
 
Dave Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh Lord, forgive me for that .003 typo. Get a life Loren.
Old 03-15-2008, 12:50 PM
  #98  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

And since the topic of the special production (SP) car, i.e. the Club Sport 911
Carrera with all its mods, was mentioned, isn't interesting that Porsche didn't
push the timing beyond the stock 911's as performance chips do, but just raised
the rev limit. So, Porsche was overly conservative with the standard production
Carrera's timing, as has been used as a basis for pushing the timing by the "tuners",
right?

Note: Per Porsche manual WKD 495 421 (911 Carrera) the fuel grade indicated
is 95 octane for the USA engine. The ROW engine required 98 octane. During the
late 1980s and early 1990s, 97/98 octane was the high grade octane and readily
available.

Last edited by Lorenfb; 03-16-2008 at 02:08 PM.
Old 03-15-2008, 01:09 PM
  #99  
ked
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hsv AL
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

"Porsche didn't push the timing beyond the stock 911's..."

yeah, & isn't it interesting that a quarter century ago the factory couldn't & wouldn't count on there being 92-93 oct gas available over the lifespan of these cars... when owner-enthusiasts are determining if & how to mod their 911s, they should consider more than WHAT the factory did, but also WHY & HOW they made their design, engineering, production and maint. decisions.
Old 03-15-2008, 07:43 PM
  #100  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,517
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
"I really think this is the magic!"

Really? It's called pushing the timing maps or on a 911SC it's called turning the
distributor a few degrees.

And as was mentioned in the same post, tweaking of the fuel maps at part throttle
has basically no effect because of the closed-loop O2 system. And at WOT,
very minor effects result there. And besides the engine is driven at part throttle
the majority of the time anyway. These fuel map issues have been discussed many
times here on Rennlist and other forums.
Hey you stupid a$$ we can't turn the distributor on a Carrera. That is a fundamental basis, along with fuel mapping of a chip mod. Go back to your land of not having any friends, and leave us alone.

What part of anyone here or on Pelican, or any other forums that you infect not having any respect for you, do you not understand?
Old 03-15-2008, 09:06 PM
  #101  
dshepp806
Rennlist Member
 
dshepp806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Middle GA.
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ked
"Porsche didn't push the timing beyond the stock 911's..."

yeah, & isn't it interesting that a quarter century ago the factory couldn't & wouldn't count on there being 92-93 oct gas available over the lifespan of these cars... when owner-enthusiasts are determining if & how to mod their 911s, they should consider more than WHAT the factory did, but also WHY & HOW they made their design, engineering, production and maint. decisions.
What say you, Loren, about this gent's observation re: octane vs. timeline? Would the Porsche engineers thought it a bit different with 93 octane?
Old 03-15-2008, 09:40 PM
  #102  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,517
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dshepp806
What say you, Loren, about this gent's observation re: octane vs. timeline? Would the Porsche engineers thought it a bit different with 93 octane?

You don't really suppose that a MORON can use his brain and actually think logically beyond what she thinks to be the final word?
Old 03-16-2008, 06:01 AM
  #103  
dshepp806
Rennlist Member
 
dshepp806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Middle GA.
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dshepp806
What say you, Loren, about this gent's observation re: octane vs. timeline? Would the Porsche engineers thought it a bit different with 93 octane?
Well,....what about this octane question, Loren?
Old 03-16-2008, 06:52 AM
  #104  
dshepp806
Rennlist Member
 
dshepp806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Middle GA.
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If Mr. Wong is reading this thread, please comment, as to Octane.

Best (and thanks for your time, especially the civil/courteous way of answering questions)
Old 03-16-2008, 11:45 AM
  #105  
scarceller
Racer
 
scarceller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

As far as Octane I really think the Porsche Design Team had to play it safe and assumed 93 octane would not always be run in the car. So I feel you could push the timing a bit further. I consulted some 911 3.2L race folks and thier tunners that run non stock EFI systems and asked them how far they push timing without a knock sensor? Some said don't go more than 30deg advance others said 32deg so this is the max being used in (Some) track cars running hi-grade 93oct and above. My car has custom chip and does not exceed about 29deg advance.

If you play with timming you better know what you are doing, as I say you are dancing between detonation and power safer to give up some power. Don't over push the timing.

Just my views on this of course.


Quick Reply: Carrera 3.2 Performance mystery and Chips (long)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:18 PM.